1 / 63

S2: Astrophysics Short Option From planets to the cosmos

S2: Astrophysics Short Option From planets to the cosmos. Roger L. Davies. Galaxies & Cosmology. Clusters of galaxies. The distribution of galaxies and large scale structure. Galaxy Assembly. Cosmic microwave background. Horizon problem. Concordance cosmology.

agnes
Download Presentation

S2: Astrophysics Short Option From planets to the cosmos

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. S2: Astrophysics Short Option From planets to the cosmos Roger L. Davies

  2. Galaxies & Cosmology Clusters of galaxies. The distribution of galaxies and large scale structure. Galaxy Assembly. Cosmic microwave background. Horizon problem. Concordance cosmology. Baryogenisis and the dark matter The fate of the Universe Supernova cosmology, the accelerating Universe & dark energy.

  3. Large Scale Structure

  4. The distribution of galaxies The Local Group Galactic Center

  5. Mapping the Universe Hubble’s law: that the distance to a galaxy is proportional to recession velocity provides a way of determining the position of galaxies in 3D. By measuring the 3D positions we can explore how galaxies are distributed in space “the structure of the Universe” Galaxies are not distributed uniformly, but rather found in filaments, on thin sheets and where filaments and sheets meet, in rich clusters. 1995 : CfA Redshift Survey : 15,000 km/s, z=0.05 Thin slice: 6° Thick slice: 36 °

  6. Mapping the Universe Hubble’s law: that the distance to a galaxy is proportional to recession velocity provides a way of determining the position of galaxies in 3D. By measuring the 3D positions we can explore how galaxies are distributed in space “the structure of the Universe” Galaxies are not distributed uniformly, but rather found in filaments, on thin sheets and where filaments and sheets meet, in rich clusters. 1995 : CfA Redshift Survey : 15,000 km/s, z=0.05 Thin slice: 6° Thick slice: 36 ° Angle on the sky distance

  7. `Fingers of god’ • Many galaxies that appear on the sky in the same place appear to span a large range distance • This is an illusion: the recession velocities arise not from the expansion of the Universe but from their random motions in a deep potential well.

  8. The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey CfA survey

  9. The distribution of galaxies Observations 140Mpc 500Mpc Hot DM Warm DM Cold Dark Matter Cold DM The computer simulations utilising different kinds of dark matter show how the distribution of galaxies tells us about the nature of dark matter. E.g. Neutrinos (HDM) would decouple when they were still relativistic wiping out structure on small scales and producing an expected distribution quite different from that observed. The distribution of galaxies suggests that Cold Dark Matter is required. Warm DM Hot DM

  10. Cosmological Simulation Gravity shapes the large scale structure of the Universe. Credit : Dalla Vecchia, Jenkins & Frenk, Durham Institute for Computational Cosmology

  11. Basic ideas of galaxy formation

  12. Distribution of dark matter Box size in millions of light years 300 120 50 Distribution of dark matter over the history of the Universe from computer simulations. 12 Gyrs 10 Gyrs Look-back time in billions of years 8 Gyrs Now

  13. Inexorably gravity builds Dark Matter halos in which galaxies form.

  14. From particles to galaxies Baryons fall into dark halos, cool and form stars → galaxies z=3 Halos merge under the influence of gravity. Many complex processes at work: shocks, turbulence, magnetic fields etc.. But gravity continues to build galaxies and stars continue to form from cold gas. Why don’t we end up with one big galaxy? z=1 z=0

  15. Hot gas Spin cooling Galaxy Models Feedback Metal enrichment (ICM & IGM) Disc formation Star formation Galaxy mergers Stellar evolution Metal enrichment (ISM)

  16. What happens when two spiral galaxies collide? ………….they make an elliptical galaxy. Simulation thanks to Matthias Steinmetz, AIP, Potsdam

  17. An elliptical galaxy with shells : NGC 3923 Evidence for past interactions Credit Anglo-Australian Observatory

  18. Galaxy Assembly Galaxies were closer together in the past. Strong tidal interactions were more common. Hubble Space Telescope has revealed that galaxies with disturbed morphologies are more common in the past. The morphological type is a strong function of local galaxy density with early-type galaxies dominating the galaxy population in the rich clusters. Galaxy interactions play an important role in shaping galaxies.

  19. Black holes & galaxy assembly • As galaxies grow through mergers, the black holes also coalesce → galaxies and black holes grow together. • We believe that Active Galactic Nuclei provide the mechanism that stops massive galaxies growing ever bigger. • The energy input into interstellar medium (feedback) from radiation from the accretion disk and jet heats ISM and quenches star formation. Co-evolution of galaxies & black holes

  20. We see galaxies as far back in time to when the Universe was less than 1 billion years old

  21. Gamma Ray Burst 090429B • A GRB occurs when a massive star, say 30 Mסּ • runs out of fuel. • They generate a short duration (a few seconds) pulse of gamma rays detected by telescopes in space. • Radiation at other wavelengths can persist longer. • This burst was probably produced by a hot, blue, supergiant star, amongst the first stars to form. • z=9.4, lookback time : 13.14 billion years.

  22. The most distant galaxy: MACS 1149-JD, z=9.6±0.2 Zheng et al Nature 489, 406 2012 Detected because it is magnified and amplified by the foreground galaxy cluster. 490 ± 15 Myears after the Big Bang

  23. The Microwave Background & Cosmology

  24. Co-moving co-ordinates and the expansion factor

  25. The Robertson Walker Metric Einstein realised that spacetime would be curved in a Universe filled with matter. If we assume the Universe is homogeneous and isotropic (this is known as the Cosmological Principle) the metric in a curved spacetime is: in spherical polar co-ordinates centred on an observer where r, θ & φ are time independent co-moving co-ordinates and R(t) is the scale factor of the Universe defined so that R=1 today. The k term can take values -1, 0, 1 and is the curvature.

  26. Cosmological time dilation & redshift Define `cosmic proper time’ measured by observers carried along with the expansion. All such clocks must run at the same rate otherwise in some galaxies time would pass faster, stars would have shorter lifetimes and the Universe would not be homogeneous. However when an observer looks at a distant galaxy in an expanding universe the light travel time makes distant clocks appear to run slow. Using the RW metric light signals emitted from galaxy 1 at time intervals Δt1 are received at galaxy 2 at intervals of Δt2 where : Δt2/ Δt1 = R(t2)/R(t1). The Universe was smaller at t1 and so the t2 intervals are longer – time dilation. Similarly the frequency of waves is reduced and their wavelength increased – the redshift! λ2/ λ1 = c Δt2/ c Δt1 = R(t2)/R(t1) = (1 + z) NB. (i) For nearby galaxies the redshift approximates to a Doppler shift (v/c) but for more distant galaxies z can be >1. (ii) No light will reach us from further away than the distance light can travel in the age of the Universe. This marks the horizon from which light is infinitely redshifted (R=0). We call this the size of the observable Universe. (iii) Although we cannot see back to the Big Bang the radiation of the cosmic microwave background originates very close to it.

  27. Matter & radiation dominated eras The present mass density of the Universe is ~ 2.5  10-27kg/m³ (about 2 protons/m³). At earlier times the mass density was higher by a factor R(t)-3. The present day energy density in CMB photons is 5  105 eV/m³. At earlier times each photon had a higher energy (shorter wavelength) by a factor R(t)-1 and the number density of photons increases by R(t)-3. Thus the energy density of radiation falls faster than the matter energy density. Problem 17 Calculate the energy density in matter today and compare it with the energy Density in the CMB radiation. At what redshift were the two energy densities equal?

  28. Cosmic microwave background Penzias & Wilson working at Bell Labs were not able to eliminate excess noise in their measurements of flux at centimetre wavelengths when they chopped against a cold source. Dicke & Wilkinson at Princeton realised that this was the relic radiation from the Big Bang predicted by Dicke & Gamov in the 1940s. The energy density is about 0.5eVcm-3, about the same as starlight. Penzias & Wilson won the Nobel Prize in 1978 for this discovery. The COBE satellite measured the spectrum of the CMB. It is a perfect black body, T=2.725K: Now the CMB photons have been redshifted and in a Universe 1000  smaller than ours (z=1000) the wavelength would have been 2μ (cf. 2mm) and T=2725K. At this and earlier times there are sufficient ultra-violet photons in the high energy tail of the spectrum to ionise H.

  29. This radiation originates 380,000 years after the Big Bang Cosmic Microwave Background COBE WMAP

  30. Cosmic microwave background Transition from ionized plasma to neutral gas occurs at 380,000 yrs We see the photons from that epoch as a surface of last scattering now redshifted to microwaves. The current state-of-the-art results on the CMB come from WMAP & Planck. ESAs Planck mission was launched in 2009. It has better resolution (5 vs 14 arcmin), wider frequency coverage (9 bands) and greater sensitivity than WMAP.

  31. Cosmic microwave background Planck WMAP The free electrons in the ionised plasma at z>1000 scatter photons and make the Universe opaque. What we see is the last scattering surface as the Universe becomes transparent. The current state-of-the-art results on the CMB come from WMAP & Planck. ESAs Planck mission was launched with better resolution (5 vs 14 arcmin), wider frequency coverage (9 bands) and greater sensitivity than WMAP.

  32. Cosmic microwave background The re-constructed image from WMAP in galactic co-ordinates (the galactic centre is at the centre of this image) shows the emission from the disk of the Galaxy and a warmer region up to the top right and cooler region to the lower left. These variations are ~ 0.1% (ΔT = 3.365±0.027 mK) and arise from the motion of the solar system with respect to the CMB. The implied velocity of the Local Group with respect to the CMB rest frame is 627±22 km/s. Compare this to the peculiar velocities of galaxies we considered.

  33. Cosmic microwave background What remains once this dipole is removed is the emission from the Galaxy. This can be removed because its spectrum differs from that of the CMB.

  34. Cosmic microwave background What remains once this dipole is removed is the emission from the Galaxy. This can be removed because its spectrum differs from that of the CMB. Once that has been removed the intrinsic fluctuations in the CMB remain. These Are roughly at the level of ± 0.001%. These fluctuations, although very small, are the seeds from which galaxies grow.

  35. Cosmic microwave background Planck What remains once this dipole is removed is the emission from the Galaxy. This can be removed because its spectrum differs from that of the CMB. Once that has been removed the intrinsic fluctuations in the CMB remain. These Are roughly at the level of ± 0.001%. These fluctuations, although very small, are the seeds from which galaxies grow.

  36. ESAs Planck mission was launched with better resolution (5 vs 14 arcmin), wider frequency coverage (9 bands) and greater sensitivity than WMAP. add Planck

  37. Cosmic microwave background We can describe the pattern of fluctuations in the CMB by a superposition of spherical harmonic components and express the result as a power spectrum showing the relative contributions at each angular scale. In order to interpret the CMB we need a physical model to predict the horizon size at the time it was last scattered. Once we have that linear size we can determine the geometry of the Universe (k) because we have a measurement of the angular scale of the fluctuations.

  38. Cosmic microwave background The result is model dependent but if we use the value of H0 from the HST key project we derive the following results: (i) the `total relative density’ is given in units of the critical density (=3H02/8πG) required for a flat Universe ie. k=0. So these results suggest that the Universe is flat. Why is it so? (ii) Only 27% of density is made of matter, only 17% of which (ie. 4% of the total), is baryonic. The rest is non-baryonic dark matter. (iii) The remaining 73% we believe to be dark energy.

  39. WMAP

  40. Planck

  41. New results form Planck • Most aspects consistent with the standard model of cosmology but some tantalizing differences: • Less small scale power • Hemispheric temperature difference • `cold spot’ • `Slower’ expansion rate: H0 = 67.3 +-1.2 km/s/Mpc

  42. The horizon problem The cosmic microwave background is very smooth but this presents us with a problem. Today the limit of the observable universe, our horizon, is: ct0 = 13.7  109 light years. At the time the CMB photons were last scattered, ctCMB = 380,000 years, and the horizon was 380,000 light years. Converting this to present day co-moving co-ordinates the size of the horizon,rH, at z=1000 is given by : rH = ctCMB/R(tCMB) or 3.8  108 light years. Assuming a flat Universe the angular scale on today’s sky corresponds to: Δθ = rH/ct0 = 0.028 radians = 1.6°! At the time of the CMB there could be no causal connection between areas on today’s sky separated by greater angles. So how did the CMB come to be uniform to ~0.001% across the whole sky? This is the first hint that the Universe experienced a rapid expansion phase at very early times: inflation.

  43. The density of baryons Spiral galaxy rotation curves, the dynamics of clusters of galaxies and strong and weak gravitational lensing suggest that much gravitating mass does not emit EM radiation. This mass cannot be in the form of baryons. At very early times the Universe was dominated by radiation. Massive particles, like baryons, did not exist. As the Universe cooled particles appeared as the energy fell below the rest mass energy of a particular particle. Hence baryons & mesons appeared 10-5s after the Big Bang. In principle more massive nuclei could have been created at this time but there is not enough time when they can be stable. At early times heavy nuclei would be destroyed by high energy photons and later there is insufficient energy to enable fusion. See Liddle `An Intro to Modern Cosmology’ 2nd Ed Ch12

  44. The density of baryons The relative number of protons and neutrons is fixed about 400s after the Big Bang by consideration of the relative masses of n & p and the neutron lifetime (half-life 614s). The ratio Np/Nn = 8. Now the He nucleus is very stable and all the available neutrons are locked into He which has 4mp. If we assume that only H & He are produced we can estimate the mass fraction in He: Y = 2Nn/(Nn + Np) = 2/(1+Np/Nn)= 0.22 The stars and nebulae with very low metal content have Y = 0.23-24. Detailed calculations of the light element abundances in the Big Bang show that the abundance of deuterium is sensitive to the mass density in baryons and indicates a value of 0.04ρc, where ρc = 3H02/8πG, is the critical density. This agrees with the result from the CMB. Only 4% of matter is baryonic, the remaining 23% non-baryonic dark matter.

  45. A finely tuned Universe? Neutron mass: 939.6 MeV/c2 Proton mass: 938.3 MeV/c2 Stability of the complex nuclei demands that energy release in β-decay is smaller than binding energy per nucleon (~ 8MeV) If we alter the neutron mass a little radical changes are implied: decrease by 1% → protons decay to neutrons via β-decay→ no atoms; increase by 1% → neutrons decay to protons via β-decay → only hydrogen.

  46. What is dark matter? • The dark matter is: • non-baryonic • weakly interacting • cold (non-relativistic = not neutrinos) • undetected – but look out for LHC results

  47. The Fate of the Universe

  48. Newtonian motivation of the Friedman equation Critical density Introduce Λ, the cosmological constant Introduce the fluid equation Show how this can lead to accelerating and decelerating solutions Supernova Cosmology Project Accelerating Universe The horizon problem, the flatness problem & inflation.

  49. Newtonian approach to the Friedman equations

  50. Friedman Eqn →

More Related