290 likes | 527 Views
Analyzing Features of Grammatical Categories. Show my head to the people; it is worth seeing. --Feature structure, to Ivan Sag in a dream. CFG’s: Chock Full of Goofs. Requires massively redundant rules Fails to capture generalizations S →NP-3p-sg VP-3p-sg S →NP-3p-pl VP-3p-pl S →NP1 VP1
E N D
Analyzing Features of Grammatical Categories Show my head to the people; it is worth seeing. --Feature structure, to Ivan Sag in a dream
CFG’s: Chock Full of Goofs • Requires massively redundant rules • Fails to capture generalizations • S→NP-3p-sg VP-3p-sg • S→NP-3p-pl VP-3p-pl • S→NP1 VP1 • S→NP2 VP2 • Rules are arbitrary • S→NP1 VP2
HPSG: How to Phix Subpar cfGs • Change atomic categories into categories that can be decomposed into features.
type feature value university NAME Stanford Univ. FOUNDERS PRESIDENT TEL feature structure Let’s get our terms straight
More complex structures • Embedding, see p. 54, fig.7a • Indexes Department TEL [1] 650-723-4284 CHAIR [TEL [1] ]
HPSG Types and Features • Initial type hierarchy, p. 61, fig. 25
HPSG Types and Features • Initial type hierarchy, p. 61, fig. 25 • First important subtypes divide expressions into words and phrases
HPSG Types and Features • Initial type hierarchy, p. 61, fig. 25 • First important subtypes divide expressions into words and phrases • All expressions have the feature HEAD
HPSG Types and Features • Initial type hierarchy, p. 61, fig. 25 • First important subtypes divide expressions into words and phrases • All expressions have the feature HEAD with a value from the pos types
HPSG Types and Features • Initial type hierarchy, p. 61, fig. 25 • First important subtypes divide expressions into words and phrases • All expressions have the feature HEAD with a value from the pos types
Agreement • Some pos types exhibit agreement, so we group them into their own subtype agr-pos, whichcarries the feature AGR • AGR feature takes the value agr-cat, which is a sub-type of feature-structure • It has (at least) the features PER and NUM • PER takes the values {1st,2nd,3rd} • NUM takes the values {sg, pl} • See p. 70, fig. 49
How much of this is universal? Other languages have different values? All languages have all features and values, but optimality-like constraints ensure that only some show up?
The VAL feature • A feature of expressions
The VAL feature • A feature of expressions • Takes the value val-cat, which has the features COMPS and SPR
The VAL feature • A feature of expressions • Takes the value val-cat, which has the features COMPS and SPR • These “represent the combinatoric potential of the word or phrase”
The VAL feature • A feature of expressions • Takes the value val-cat, which has the features COMPS and SPR • These “represent the combinatoric potential of the word or phrase” • COMPS takes the value itr, str, or dtr; p.62, fig. 27 • All expressions have this feature (so far)
Underspecification • A type can be unspecified for a particular feature • This picks out a larger class of feature structures (it includes more kinds of feature structures) • Underspecification allows some kinds of generalizations that we couldn’t get from CFGs, p. 63, fig.28
The SPR feature • A generalization of the notion ‘determiner’ • Distinguishes N, NOM, and NP • SPR + for NP • SPR – for NOM
The SPR feature • A generalization of the notion ‘determiner’ • Distinguishes N, NOM, and NP • SPR + for NP • SPR – for NOM • SPR + or SPR – for N
The SPR feature • A generalization of the notion ‘determiner’ • Distinguishes N, NOM, and NP • SPR + for NP • SPR – for NOM • SPR + or SPR – for N • Also used to distinguish S and VP • S is SPR + • VP needs a subject NP to the left, so it is SPR – • Huh? p. 64, fig. 34
Team 1: lexical entry for the noun “verb” As in, “Weird can be a verb” Team 2: lexical entry for the verb “verbs” As in, “Calvin verbs the word ‘weird’.”
Diagramming for Dollars • Round 1: lexical entries • Round 2: p. 65, fig. 37a
Diagramming for Dollars • Round 1: lexical entries • Round 2: p. 65, fig. 37a • Round 3: p. 69, fig. 47
Agreement Rule • Agreement features get “passed up” from daughters to mothers • See rule, p. 70, fig. 50 • Tree in 51
Head Feature PrincipleThere is a wisdom of the head… --Charles Dickens • Every headed phrase has a head daughter with the same head values • General form: p. 72, fig. 53 • Headed rules: p. 73, fig. 54, esp. 54d
Diagramming for Dollars • Round 1: lexical entries • Round 2: p. 65, fig. 37a • Round 3: p. 69, fig. 47 • Round 4: “LING7420 loves HPSG.” “The professor cheers.”