1 / 23

Meaningful Use Workgroup Recommendations for Response to Stage 2 Notice of Proposed Rule Making on EHR Incentive Program

Meaningful Use Workgroup Recommendations for Response to Stage 2 Notice of Proposed Rule Making on EHR Incentive Program. Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co-Chair April 4, 2012. Workgroup Membership. Co-Chairs:

alair
Download Presentation

Meaningful Use Workgroup Recommendations for Response to Stage 2 Notice of Proposed Rule Making on EHR Incentive Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Meaningful Use Workgroup Recommendations for Response to Stage 2 Notice of Proposed Rule Making on EHR Incentive Program Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia University, Co-Chair April 4, 2012

  2. Workgroup Membership Co-Chairs: Paul Tang Palo Alto Medical Foundation George Hripcsak Columbia University Members: • David Bates Brigham & Women’s Hospital • Michael Barr American College of Physicians • Christine Bechtel National Partnership/Women & Families • Neil Calman Institute for Family Health • Tim Cromwell Department of Veterans Affairs • Art Davidson Denver Public Health • Marty Fattig Nemaha County Hospital • James Figge NY State Dept. of Health • Joe Francis Veterans Administration • Leslie Kelly Hall Healthwise • Yael Harris HRSA • David Lansky Pacific Business Group/Health • Deven McGraw Center/Democracy & Technology • Latanya SweeneyCarnegie Mellon University • Greg Pace Social Security Administration • Robert Tagalicod CMS/HHS • Karen Trudel CMS • Charlene Underwood Siemens • Amy Zimmerman Rhode Island Department of Health and Human Services MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  3. Agenda • Initial MU WG response to stage 2 NPRM • Initial MU WG response to selected other questions in NPRM • Q&A and Discussion MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  4. Response Timeline • Meaningful Use Work Group deliberation on response to stage 2 NPRM • Selected objectives and quality measures assigned to other work groups • April 4: Present initial recommendations for HITPC feedback • April: MU WG revise recommendations • May 2: Revised recommendations for HITPC approval • By May 7: Submit HITPC response to NPRM MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  5. Improve quality safety, efficiency and reducing health disparities MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  6. Improve quality safety, efficiency and reducing health disparities improve MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  7. Improve quality safety, efficiency and reducing health disparities improve MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  8. Improve quality safety, efficiency and reducing health disparities MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  9. Improve quality safety, efficiency and reducing health disparities Improve quality MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  10. Objectives not included - Improve quality safety, efficiency and reducing health disparities Objectives not included MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  11. Engage patients and families in their care Engage patients and families MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  12. Engage patients and families in their care Engage patients and families MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  13. Objective not included - Engage patients and families in their care Objective not included MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  14. Improve care coordination Improve Care Coordination MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  15. Objectives not included Objectives not included - Improve Care Coordination MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  16. Improve population and public health Improve population and public health MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  17. Improve population and public health Improve population and public health MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  18. Privacy and security Privacy and security protections for personal MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  19. Comments Solicited in NPRM (I) MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  20. Comments Solicited in NPRM (II) MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  21. Comments Solicited in NPRM (III) MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  22. Comments Solicited in NPRM (IV) MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

  23. Questions and Discussion MU Workgroup Recommended Response to Stage 2 NPRM

More Related