1 / 15

Maintenance Metrics

Maintenance Metrics. Adam Adgar School of Computing and Technology. Introduction. Metrics are essential in maintenance and asset management activity Assist management and plant personnel to: Understand requirements Identify improvement opportunities Prioritise resources

alexa
Download Presentation

Maintenance Metrics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Maintenance Metrics Adam Adgar School of Computing and Technology

  2. Introduction • Metrics are essential in maintenance and asset management activity • Assist management and plant personnel to: • Understand requirements • Identify improvement opportunities • Prioritise resources • Measure performance to objectives

  3. Introduction • Metrics must demonstrate the value of maintenance improvements in financial terms • Hierarchy of distinct metrics can be linked to corporate goals • Requires consistent definitions and rules to avoid skewing of values and incorrect decisions being made • Metrics must cascade from the top of the organisation and must directly relate to goals • Set of metrics adopted must be focused to avoid information overload and confusion

  4. Overview of Metrics

  5. Benchmarking • “A systematic process for measuring best practice and comparing the results to corporate performance in order ot identify opportunities for improvement and superior performance.” • Examples: • Tonnes of steel produced per available hour • Assembly hours per automobile

  6. General Benchmarking Process • Select functions to be benchmarked • Identify performance and effectiveness metrics • Collect internal data • Validate metrics • Establish performance • Select external site for comparison • Collect external data • Establish performance • Compare internal and external results • Analysis of results

  7. Typical Benchmarking Areas • Planning and Scheduling • Preventive Maintenance • Predictive Maintenance • Reliability Improvement • Spare Parts Management • Contract Maintenance Management

  8. Benchmarking Methodology • Requirements • Specific to plant, process, equipment… • Consider reliability of data sources • Easily understandable • Repeatable • Demonstrate cause and effect • Support follow–on monitoring

  9. Common Metrics • Corporate Asset and Capital Metrics • RONA, ROCE, EVA, ROE, ROA • Overall Effectiveness Metrics • AssetUtilisation, OEE, COPQ, Uptime, OperationalReadiness, Availability, CostofUnavailability, Downtime • Industry Performance Metrics • CAV, RAV, EDC, EFOR, life cycle cost/profit, production cost/labour unit per unit produced • Equipment Management Metrics • MTBF, MTTF, MTTR • Key Performance Indicators • Work Process Productivity Metrics

  10. Application of Metrics • Very important to select the correct metrics – must be meaningful • Must connect to organisational objectives • All key processes should have one or more metrics associated. • Consider cost of collecting suitable data

  11. Benefits of Applying Metrics • Documented evidence for the following: • improvement in terms of increased availability and reduced downtime (product value) • Increased product quality (quality premium compared to COPQ losses) • Increased throughput (product value) • Reduction in maintenance costs (saved labour hours, parts, consumables) • Reduction in breakdown costs (new average repair cost) • Increased energy efficiency (new production cost) • Reduced spare parts inventory (freed capital)

  12. Summary • Good metrics will focus activities on maximum benefits and value added. • Poor metric lead to unintended results. • Metrics should be positive rather than negative (e.g. first run quality, not rework) • Avoid conflicting metrics • Examine complementary metrics together (e.g. yield, quality) • Identify causes of non-compliance • Metrics must be updated when required and eliminated if not used

  13. References • Mitchell, J.S., Hickman, J.E., Amadi-Echendu, J.E. (2007) Physical Asset Management Handbook. Clarion Technical Publishers. • Wireman, T. (2003) Benchmarking Best Practices in Maintenance Management. Industrial Press Inc.

More Related