430 likes | 643 Views
Venous Thromboembolism. Denise Watt January 3, 2002. Outline. epidemiology pathophysiology risk factors diagnosis clinical labs diagnostic imaging algorithms treatment. Case 1. Rural ED 72 yo male fever, SOB, pleuritic CP x 2 days HR 110, bp 140/90, RR 22, sat 90%
E N D
Venous Thromboembolism Denise Watt January 3, 2002
Outline • epidemiology • pathophysiology • risk factors • diagnosis • clinical • labs • diagnostic imaging • algorithms • treatment
Case 1 • Rural ED • 72 yo male • fever, SOB, pleuritic CP x 2 days • HR 110, bp 140/90, RR 22, sat 90% • CXR unremarkable • what test/Rx?
Case 2 • 55 yo man • sudden central CP, SOB, presyncope • HR 120, bp 90/70, RR 30, sats 88% • ECG: sinus tach • what tests/Rx?
Case 3 • 33 yo healthy woman, 34 wks GA • syncope at home • EMS called • asystolic arrest en route • CPR x 5 min • what do you do?
Epidemiology • Lifetime incidence VTE 2-5% • PE: 0.5/1,000/year • DVT: 1/1,100/year • PE mortality: • 10% die in 1st hour • 30% untreated • 2-8% if anticoagulated • >50% PEs undiagnosed
Primary Factor V leiden Antithrombin III deficiency Prot C deficiency Prot S deficiency hyperhomo-cysteinemia anticardiolipin Ab dysfibrinogenemia Secondary age trauma / surgery malignancy immobilization stroke smoking obesity OCP/HRT lupus anticoagulant pregnancy hyperviscosity heart failure Risk Factors
Risk Factors • 50% without risk factors • OCP/HRT: 3x baseline risk • 0.3/10,000/yr; 15/10,000/yr • higher in 3rd gen progesterones • pregnancy: 5x baseline risk • 75% DVT antepartum, 66% PE postpartum
Pathophysiology:Source of VTE • most start in calf, extend proximally • 70% PE have DVT evidence at autopsy • 70-90% known source: IVC, ileofemoral or pelvic veins, 10-20% SVC • incidence of PE from DVT • calf: 46% • thigh: 67% • pelvic: 77% • other: UE, jugular, mesenteric, cerebral
Hemodynamic tachycardia hypotension RV overload and dilation CVP LV preload myocardial flow pulmonary HTN pul A-V shunts Respiratory hyperventilation PA HTN compliance atelectasis broncho-constriction airway resistance Consequences of PE
Clinical Presentation:DVT • Calf-popliteal • 80-90%, many asymptomatic • pain & swelling • spreads proximally • Ileofemoral • pain in buttock, groin • thigh swelling • 10-20% cases
Clinical Prediction Model for DVTWells et al. Ann Int Med, 1997
Clinical Presentation of PE:The great pretender • SOB, CP or tachypnea in 97% • individual s+s not sensitive/specific • peripheral (distal vessel) • pleuritic CP, ± hemoptysis, ± SOBOE • central (lobar / segmental) • SOBOE • massive (main pulmonary artery) • syncope, hypotension, shock
Ancillary tests for PE • CXR: • r/o other diagnoses • ‘classic’ signs non-specific • ABG: • 20% have normal PaO2 • 15-20% have normal Aa gradient • ECG: • remember???
D-dimer • degradation product of fibrin • PPV poor; NPV excellent • non-specific: • +ve: surgery, trauma, hemorrhage, CA • 90% +ve >80 yrs old • most useful in ED patients • NOT to r/o PE in high PTP
Diagnostic Imaging for DVT • Duplex / compression U/S • non-invasive, portable • direct visualization of veins and flow • loss of compression = DVT • 97% sensitive & specific for symptomatic proximal/popliteal DVT • 62% sensitive for asymptomatic DVT • +ve in 30-50% PE; 5% non-dx V/Q scans
Serial Venous U/S • 2 protocols: Wells & Hull • may avoid angiography in ?PE • 2% +ve in 2 weeks (?PE) • if U/S -ve 2 weeks apart, <2% have VTE in next 6 mos
Diagnostic Imaging for DVT • IPG • detects changes in flow before and after cuff inflated • sensitivity 60%
Diagnostic Imaging for PE:V/Q scan • PIOPED: ventilation component adds little info • PISAPED criteria: • normal, non-diagnostic, high probability • 25%, 50%, 25% respectively • high prob: 85-90% PPV • non-diagnostic: 25% PE • interpret in context of PTP
Diagnostic Imaging for PE:Pulmonary Angiography • Gold standard (imperfect) • sens 98%, spec 95-98% • ED physicians reluctant to use: • invasive, risks, requires expertise, not readily available, time consuming, $ • relative contraindications • indicated if non-invasive tests inconclusive
Diagnostic Imaging for PE:Spiral CT • IV contrast, direct visualization • subsegmental PE not well seen • more specific, underlying lung dx • sens depends on CT, experience • wide variation in studies • Rathbun. Ann Intern Med, 2000 (review) • sens 53-100%, spec 81-100% • poor methodolgy of studies
Spiral CT • Perrier. Ann Intern Med, 2001 • sens 70%, spec 91% , 4% inconclusive • good interobserver agreement • CT venography: • benefit over U/S not determined • role? • no evidence to withold Rx if CT negative • may replace angiography
Diagnostic Imaging in PE:Echocardiography • useful for patients in shock/arrest • r/o DDx: tamponade, Ao dissection, AMI • indirect evidence of PE: • RV overload, septal shift to L, TR, PA pressure, RV wall motion abn • sens 93%, spec 81% • ‘sub-massive’ PE: independent predictor of mortality (?significance)
Wells’ Algorithm:Criticism • Uses SimpliRED assay: lower sens. • sCT not included • could replace angiography? • Low prevalence of PE (9%) • not validated by other RCTs
Treatment of VTE:Goals • reduce mortality • prevent extension/recurrence • restore pulmonary vascular resistance • prevent pulmonary hypertension
Treatment of VTE:Anticoagulation • Out-patient LMWH • LMWH superior to UFH? (Gould 1999) • out-pt Rx safe in PE (Kovacs, 2000) • DVT: start Rx, definitive test in 24hr • baseline B/W
Anticoagulation • Enoxaparin 1mg/kg bid or 1.5 od • Tinzaparin 175 anti-Xa u/kg od • start warfarin 5mg on day 1 • d/c LMWH when INR >2.0 x 2 days • Rx 3 mos if 1st and reversible cause • 6 mos if non-reversbile • indefinite if recurrent, CA, genetic
Treatment of PE:Criteria for admission • Hemodynamic instability • O2 requirement • surgery < 48hr • risk of active bleeding • history of HIT • IV pain control
Treatment of massive PE • judicious fluids (500cc max) • NE, dopamine, dobutamine prn • O2, intubate if shock • positive pressure worsens RV fn • anticoagulation • if no contraindications • UFH if hypotensive • PTT 1.5-2.5 x normal
Treatment of massive PE:Thrombolytics • no evidence of mortality benefit • including in cardiac arrest (case series) • no benefit in hemodynamically stable • improves pul. perfusion (15% vs 2%), RV function (34% vs. 17%) cf. heparin • t-PA faster hemodynamic effect • IV same as intrapulmonary • 5-10% major bleed, 1-2% ICH
Thrombolytics • 2 week window of opportunity! • effect with time • no advantage of t-PA bolus • protocols: • t-PA: 100mg over 2 hr • UK: 4400U/kg over 10min; rpt x 12-24hr • SK: 250,000U over 30min; 100,000 x 24h • arrest: t-PA 10mg/kg bolus x 2 q 30 min
Embolectomy • Indicated in acute, massive PE if: • contraindication to thrombolytics • unresponsive to medical mgt • moribund pt poor results • no evidence cf. with thrombolytics • percutaneous vs. surgical • ?role
IVC Filters • Indications: • contraindication to anticoagulation • recurrent VTE despite anticoagulation • after surgical embolectomy • no long term adv vs. anticoagulation • anticoagulate if no contraindications • DVT and IVC occlusion
Pregnancy • V/Q safe, no breastfeed x 15hr post • D-dimer in pregnancy, wide Aa • angiography safer than empiric Rx • LMWH in DVT, not studied in PE • PE: UFH IV x 4-5 days, then s/c • treat x 3 months or 6 weeks postpartum • switch to oral postpartum