1 / 31

Hank Savitch School of Urban & Public Affairs University of Louisville

WHAT MAKES A GREAT CITY GREAT? PUTTING AMERICA IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT. Hank Savitch School of Urban & Public Affairs University of Louisville.

anakin
Download Presentation

Hank Savitch School of Urban & Public Affairs University of Louisville

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WHAT MAKES A GREAT CITY GREAT? PUTTING AMERICA IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT Hank Savitch School of Urban & Public Affairs University of Louisville

  2. London is not a pleasant place; it is not an agreeable place, or a cheerful place or easy or exempt from reproach. It is only magnificent. -- Henry James

  3. GREATNESS DOES NOT EQUAL COMFORT • Parisian new towns vis-a-vis Paris • New York Suburbs vis-a-vis New York City • Tampa, Phoenix, Salt Lake City are comfortable, pleasant places but not great

  4. HISTORICAL VIEW • Jerusalem & Rome: Religion and Politics 6th to First Centuries, CE • Athens & Alexandria: Intellectual (Plato, Socrates, Aristotle, Ptolemy) 6th to First Centuries, CE (respectively) • Venice & Amsterdam: Seaport Trading, 13th and 17th Century (respectively) • Florence and Paris: Art 14th to 16th and 19th (respectively) • New York and Hong Kong: Commerce (20th and 21st centuries) • LA (Hollywood), Seattle & Bangalore: Creativity, Innovation

  5. Greatness • Amplitude, majesty, intensity, prominence • Inner ability to generate unique strength and attributes • Outer ability to project uniqueness

  6. Four Cs of Urban Greatness

  7. Concurrency • Encompass the dominant values, drives and temper (zeitgeist) of the times • Jerusalem: Birth of 3 religions in religious era • Athens: Philosophy in a time of searching • Florence: Art, Birth of Renaissance • London: Economic prowess re industrial revolution • Seattle: Microsoft and digital age

  8. Cosmopolitanism • Gateway to a larger world through trade, culture, immigration, other appeals • Ethnic diversity and multi culturalism -- Athens focal point of Greek City States -- Rome center of a Mediterranean empire -- Venice opening to the Orient -- London foreign business and immigration

  9. Concentration • Centeredness through density and clustering (Jacobs, Porter) • Radial Concentric City • Monocentric and conical spatial form of -- Athens’ Agora -- Rome’s Coliseum -- Venice’s Ports -- Paris’ Golden Triangle

  10. Charisma • Unique and magnetic appeal • The character of a city that signals immediate recognition • Logos -- Jerusalem’s Old City -- Athens’ Parthenon -- Venice’s Canals -- Paris’ Eiffel Tower

  11. Application to American Cities • Revising the definition of “greatness” -- Cities still belong to nations -- Nations are limited in number of great cities -- Cities still project national economies • National level “great cities” as regional cores -- Scaled down yet still outstanding -- Possessing concurrency, cosmopolitanism, concentration and charisma

  12. Four Cities • New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francisco • Basis of Selection -- Taylor and Laing, highest GNC scores (New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francisco) -- Boschkin’s “K” cluster of seven variable (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Boston and San Francisco)

  13. The 4Cs in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and San Francisco

  14. Concurrency • NYC’s financial power in a global and transnational era • LA’s film and television presence in an age of media • SF’s banks, insurance and visual character in a time of tourism • Chicago’s niche position as the “second city” with a little bit of everything

  15. Cosmopolitanism • NYC as the immigrant/multi cultural city as both un American and typically American • LA as the Western gateway for Asians and Latin Americans • SF as the great tourist attraction combined with its being the “gay capital” of America • Chicago, again the “second city”; niche position with a little bit of everything

  16. Concentration • NYC with two central business districts (mid town and lower Manhattan); highest central city density in the country • Chicago mid level skyline • SF smaller and lower and skyline; compact CBD and waterfront • LA is the outlier as a low density and poly nucleated (“LA School” claim to “post modernism”)

  17. Charisma • NYC first city to visit, move to or make a career (“The Big Apple”) • LA’s celebrities, its de-centered, outdoor life style (“Sunny LA”) • SF’s urbane beauty, charm and nostalgia coupled to left leaning politics and social tolerance (“City on the Bay”) • Chicago history (gangsters, stockyards, machine politics, sports teams) coupled to a current combination of amenities (“The Windy City”).

  18. Conclusions • Not all cities can be Great Cities -- need “4C” requisites -- it is enough to be a “good city” -- cities still attempt copy cat, superficial efforts (convention centers, sports stadia, invented museums) • Niche positioning possible -- meeting “4C” requisites (structural issue) -- skillful development strategy (agency issue) -- Chicago • City Greatness is dynamic -- conditions change and so do cities -- shifted greatness in ancient, medieval and modern cities -- future shifts to Beijing, Mumbai and Sydney

More Related