80 likes | 513 Views
Plan for Today: Neoliberal Institutionalism. Understanding structure and expected outcomes in Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Brainstorm possible modifications to lead to more cooperation in PD game. Neoliberal Institutionalism An Exemplary Game: The Prisoner’s Dilemma.
E N D
Plan for Today:Neoliberal Institutionalism Understanding structure and expected outcomes in Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Brainstorm possible modifications to lead to more cooperation in PD game.
Neoliberal InstitutionalismAn Exemplary Game: The Prisoner’s Dilemma • Shows how suboptimal outcomes can happen when each individual acts in own self-interest. • Illustration of imperfect outcomes in situations of uncertainty and incomplete information (e.g. international anarchy). • Then show ways situations can be mitigated by modifying conditions of the game.
Neoliberal InstitutionalismAn Exemplary Game: The Prisoner’s Dilemma • Conditions: • In simplest form, involves 2 players. • Each player self-interested, self-reliant utility-maximizer. • Only one move for each player, simultaneously. • Players cannot consult each other for information or seek outside help.
Prisoner’s DilemmaNumerical Payoffs(refer to Lipson for more details)
Outcome of Prisoner’s Dilemma • Rational players would choose to defect to avoid worst outcome. • Dominant strategy therefore suboptimal: both could gain more by cooperating. • Each actor pursuing own self-interests leads to undesirable outcome for all.
Small Group Discussion • Think as a group of 2-3 ideas of modifications to the PD game that might lead to greater cooperation. (5 minutes) • But still keep: • Actors as selfish utility-maximizers. • Players simultaneously deciding, so each can’t know what other will choose. • Payoff values for each possible outcome. • Leader report group proposals to class.