1 / 141

CAPACITY, DURESS, UNCONSCIONABILITY -and- UNFAIR TERMS

CAPACITY, DURESS, UNCONSCIONABILITY -and- UNFAIR TERMS. Law of Contract LW1154 BCL 2005-2006. Reading. Textbook: Clark chapters 12-13 and 16, and pp194-196 Reference: McDermott chapters 14 and 17, and pp 492-506. DURESS, UNDUE INFLUENCE -and- UNCONSCIONABILITY .

angelito
Download Presentation

CAPACITY, DURESS, UNCONSCIONABILITY -and- UNFAIR TERMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CAPACITY, DURESS, UNCONSCIONABILITY -and- UNFAIR TERMS Law of Contract LW1154 BCL 2005-2006

  2. Reading • Textbook: Clark chapters 12-13 and 16, and pp194-196 • Reference: McDermottchapters 14 and 17, and pp 492-506

  3. DURESS, UNDUE INFLUENCE -and- UNCONSCIONABILITY

  4. 3 distinct doctrines • Duress • Undue influence • Unconsc-ionability • Similar factual situations • Same general complaint that the contracts are unfair • Slightly different focuses

  5. The doctrines • Duress = contract was secured through unfair pressure • Undue influence = contract was secured through abuse of trust • Unconscionability = contract was secured by sharp dealing

  6. How close are the doctrines? • In practice, the doctrines are quite similar to one another • Facts which bring in one doctrine also tend to bring in the others • The basic question seems to be the same in all 3 … • … viz, Was there genuine consent to the terms of the contract?

  7. A unitary doctrine? • “Inequality of bargaining power” was proposed as a unifying notion … • … to cover these and other doctrines for correcting unfair or unbalanced contracts … • ... by Lord Denning in Lloyds Bank v. Bundy [1975] QB 326

  8. A unitary doctrine? • But no jurisdiction has yet accepted Denning’s broad notion • To say that the various doctrines are similar does not mean that they are identical … • … and a broad doctrine loses sight of important distinctions … • ... as well as unsettling commercial contracts generally

  9. DURESS andUNFAIR PRESSURE

  10. Duress - elements • Where a contract is made as a result of unlawful pressure … • … which no individual of reasonable firmness could have withstood … • … then the party under pressure has a right to escape from the contract

  11. Types of duress • Various types of duress are present in the cases • But today, they are all simply examples of the same principle … • … that a sufficiently serious threat can invalidate consent to the contract

  12. Types of duress 1. Physical force or violence • If violence, or the threat of it, is used to force someone to contract ... • … then they have a right to escape from the contract • At one time, this was the only recognised ground of duress … • … but today is simply an extreme example

  13. Example Lessee of Blackwood v. Gregg (1831) Hayes 277 • A 92-year-old was abducted and imprisoned by relatives • He later signed a deed in favour of one of his captors • It was held that fear of imprisonment could amount to duress … • … enabling him to avoid the deed

  14. Types of duress 2. Threats to property A threat to someone’s property can amount to duress • eg a threat to damage it • eg a threat to set fire to it • eg a threat to take it away

  15. ExampleSmelter Corp v. O’Driscoll [1977] IR 305 • P sought to buy an option over D’s land • P threatened that if D would not grant the option, the City authorities would compulsorily purchase the land from D • The Supreme Court thought this sufficient to amount to duress

  16. Types of duress 3. Threats to sue or prosecute • A threat of legal proceedings can certainly constitute duress … • … provided it is sufficiently serious • The court will need to put itself in the place of the party threatened … • … to assess how serious the threat was

  17. ExampleWilliams v. Bayley (1866) LR 1 HL 200 • A son forges his father’s signature on promissory notes • Bank threatens to prosecute the son unless the father honours the notes • A successful prosecution would have resulted in the son’s transportation • Father’s agreement to honour the notes was set aside

  18. Types of duress • But the result might be different if the consequences of legal action are less severe … • … or if the party threatened has more time to think carefully about the matter … • … or has good legal advice

  19. ExampleMcConville v. ESB (1997) 8 ELR 46 • P was suspected of fraud by his employers • He was told that a prosecution would be recommended • On legal advice, he agreed to resign to avoid prosecution • He later argued that there was duress

  20. ExampleMcConville v. ESB (1997) 8 ELR 46 Buchanan J held that: • Dismissal was, at the time of P’s resignation, “a long way down the road” … • … and P’s decision was taken “for his own reasons” in the light of his legal advice • No sufficient duress was found

  21. Types of duress 4. Economic duress • This is a threat of economic harm … • … usually by refusing to carry out a commercial contract • The doctrine has only recently arisen … • … but it seems to be accepted by the Irish courts (eg Hearn v. Collins High Court 3/2/98)

  22. ExampleAtlas Expressv.Kafco [1989] 1 AER 641 • P agrees to carry D’s goods to purchasers • D’s survival depends on P’s carrying out the contract • P suddenly demands double the contract price, and D agrees • But when P sued for the extra, a defence of duress succeeded

  23. The degree of pressure Various phrases are used to identify the necessary degree of pressure: - • “No free will” • “Vitiation of consent” • “Overborne will” There is no very precise test

  24. The degree of pressure Relevant factors are:- • Whether the person threatened made any protest • Whether they had a reasonable alternative open to them • Whether they were independently advised • Whether they later took steps to avoid the contract

  25. The degree of pressure • Economic pressure is much less serious than the other sorts … • … and so the courts are particularly hard to convince where economic duress is pleaded • Mere “commercial pressure” is not enough to constitute duress • The threat must be catastrophic

  26. ExamplePao On v. Lau Yiu Long [1979] 3 AER 65 • Buyout agreement to exchange one parcel of shares for another • Subsequent refusal by one side to complete, unless there was a guarantee as to share values • This threatened the collapse of the entire deal

  27. ExamplePao On v. Lau Yiu Long [1979] 3 AER 65 The Privy Council held that: • “There was commercial pressure, but no coercion” • Both companies were very large, well-advised concerns • No sufficient duress was found

  28. “Unlawful” pressure? • It is often said that the pressure must be “unlawful” • But it is not clear what this means, if anything • It is certainly not always a defence that the threat was a perfectly lawful one to make … • … though this appears to be a relevant factor

  29. ExampleCTN v. Gallaher [1994] 4 AER 714 • A consignment of cigarettes was lost by theft • Sellers demanded that buyers should pay for them • When buyers refused, sellers threatened to deny them credit in the future • Buyers paid, but later pleaded duress

  30. ExampleCTN v. Gallaher [1994] 4 AER 714 The court of appeal held: • The sellers were quite entitled to refuse credit if they wished • While the pressure on the buyers was extreme, it did not constitute duress • But the court did not say that lawful threats could never constitute duress

  31. Causation • Duress cannot be effective unless it supersedes all other motives for acting … • … so if it appears that the party threatened would have acted the same way anyway, duress is not established • But the case law is not entirely clear

  32. ExampleBarton v. Armstrong [1976] AC 104 • Sale of a company on fair terms • But when the seller hesitated in accepting the contract … • … the buyer threatened to have him killed

  33. ExampleBarton v. Armstrong [1976] AC 104 The Privy Council held: • Even though the “primary and pre-dominant motive” was commercial necessity … • … duress was established if the threat was one motive for agreeing But this is a controversial view

  34. Remedy • The effect of duress is that the contract is set aside at the threatened party’s option … • … and cannot be enforced by the other party • The remedy is lost by delay in asserting it … • … or by affirming the contract after the threat has been lifted

  35. UNDUE INFLUENCE

  36. Undue influence Elements:- • A very close relationship between the contracting parties … • … which leads one side to place great trust in the other … • … and so to fail to exercise independent judgment in deciding whether to make a contract

  37. Unfair pressure? • Sometimes one side put very strong pressure on the other, or bullied them • But this is just an example of the doctrine of undue influence … • … which asks whether the weaker party was able to exercise their own judgment

  38. Fairness • In theory, the question is not whether the contract was fair … • … but whether it was entered into voluntarily • In practice, fairness is central … • … because lack of fairness is very strong evidence of lack of voluntariness

  39. ExampleCarroll v. Carroll [1999] 4 IR 241 • An elderly man transferred his farm to his son for nothing • The man had no other assets • He had been misled, and thought his daughters would be entitled to stay • His lawyer advised, but also did not know the full facts • The Supreme Court found undue influence

  40. Rebuttal • But if an informed and independent decision was taken … • … then undue influence is disproved … • … and the transaction cannot be set aside (Moyles v. Mahon [2000] IEHC 197, [2000] Ann Rev Ir L 108-111)

  41. Relationships of trust Which relationships involve enough trust to bring in the doctrine? • Many professional relationships do • Many family relationships do • But any sufficiently close relationship will be sufficient There are many examples

  42. Example – family relationshipGregg v. Kidd [1956] IR 183 • An ill man was staying with his sister • In effect, she told him to make a will in her children’s favour, or get out • He transferred his only property to the children • The transfer was later set aside for undue influence

  43. Example – professional relationship Tolhurst v. Smith [1994] EMLR 508 • P and D were members of a pop group • Over time, D effectively took charge of the group … • … and P developed a drink problem • D persuaded P to agree to take a lower percentage of the group’s earnings • Undue influence was found

  44. Example – other relationshipAllcard v. Skinner (1887) 36 Ch D 145 • Woman of 27 entering an enclosed religious sisterhood • Vows of poverty and obedience • She made a large gift of property to the order • No evidence of pressure or deception • Nonetheless, sufficient undue influence was found

  45. Problems of proof • So while there is often good evidence of undue influence … • … it is usually very hard to show exactly what was said, or what effect it had … • … or whether, despite the influence, a free and independent judgment was exercised

  46. Proof - types of case Category 1 • Actual undue influence is proved Category 2 • Undue influence is presumed, unless proof to the contrary is given

  47. Category 1 Actual proof of undue influence • It is for the person alleging the influence to prove it • This type of case is not uncommon • But it is very dependent on the actual facts … • … and so rarely ends up in the law reports

  48. ExampleO’Flanagan v. Ray-Ger High Court 3/2/98 • Agreement for a transfer of property • The transferee dominated the transferor, his business partner • The agreement left the transferor’s family unprovided for • Costello J found undue influence in fact

  49. Category 2 • Presumption of undue influence • Influence must be disproved • The presumption may arise from: • Traditional case law (2A) • The actual relationship (2B) • Disproof will involve a showing that independent judgment was exercised despite any influence

  50. Category 2A Traditional presumed influence: • eg Parent’s influence over child • eg Guardian’s influence over ward • eg Doctor’s influence over patient • eg Lawyer’s influence over client The categories are not closed: • egTolhurst v. Smith (pop group manager over member of the group)

More Related