1 / 29

An Examination of the Impact of Formerly Incarcerated Persons Helping Others

An Examination of the Impact of Formerly Incarcerated Persons Helping Others. Thomas P. LeBel University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Paper Presented at the Prisoner Reentry Institute Occasional Series on Reentry Research John Jay College of Criminal Justice April 18, 2008.

annick
Download Presentation

An Examination of the Impact of Formerly Incarcerated Persons Helping Others

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Examination of the Impact of Formerly Incarcerated Persons Helping Others Thomas P. LeBel University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Paper Presented at the Prisoner Reentry Institute Occasional Series on Reentry Research John Jay College of Criminal Justice April 18, 2008

  2. Interest in a Career Helping Others Among Formerly Incarcerated Persons • “Most of the program staff themselves, often the directors, are ex-convicts….This type of career is very popular among prisoners and ex-prisoners. When I have asked prisoners what they would like to do in the future, many say they want a job counseling other people, usually young people.” (Irwin, 2005, p. 178).

  3. Theory and Research About Benefits of Helping Others • Helper therapy principle (Riessman, 1965, 1990) • Wounded healers (White, 2000) • Retroflexive reformation (Cressey, 1955, 1965) • The professional ex- (Brown, 1991) • Desistance from crime (Maruna, 2001)

  4. Helper Therapy Principle • Calls attention to the benefits the ”helper receives from being in the helper role” (Riessman, 1965, p. 32). • Reinforcement of personal learning • Social approval and acceptance • Sense of meaning, purpose, and accomplishment • Improved self-esteem and self-worth • Better treatment outcomes

  5. Wounded Healers (White, 2000) • Persons in recovery from substance use helping others • Assets: • Personal experience • Emotional identification (kinship) • Absence of condescension and contempt • A zeal (calling) to heal others • Ability to use own stories to incite hope • A willingness to be more directive • The capacity to serve as a role model • Mutual aid societies

  6. Retroflexive Reformation • Social psychological foundations for using criminals in the rehabilitation of criminals (Cressey, 1955, 1965). • “A group in which criminal A joins with some non-criminals to change criminal B is probably most effective in changing criminal A, not B. In order to change criminal B, criminal A must necessarily share the values of the anti-criminal members” (Cressey, 1955, p. 119).

  7. The Professional Ex- • It is important to consider how one might “adopt a legitimate career premised upon an identity that embraces one’s deviant history” (Brown, 1991, p. 220). • “Professional ex-s” are individuals who have “exited their deviant careers by replacing them with occupations in professional counseling” (Brown, 1991, p. 219). • For the study discussed today: • Several staff members stated that “this is the only job where my criminal record is viewed as an asset.”

  8. Helping Others and Desistance from Crime • Individuals “going straight” are significantly more care-oriented, other-centered and focused on promoting the next generation (Maruna, 2001). • “The desisting self-narrative frequently involves reworking a delinquent history into a source of wisdom to be drawn from while acting as a drug counselor, youth worker, community volunteer, or mutual-help group member” (Maruna, 2001, p. 117).

  9. Research Questions • 1) To what degree do formerly incarcerated persons think of themselves as helpers/wounded healers? • 2) What factors might account for any differences in the helper orientation? • 3) Is thinking of oneself as a helper related to well-being and criminality? • How do staff differ from program participants?

  10. Sample and Data Collection • Sample (N = 228) • Formerly incarcerated persons in NYC and Upstate NY • Men and women • Participants in 6 reintegration programs • Data collection • Part of larger study of perceptions of and responses to stigma • Self-administered questionnaire • “Closed-ended” questions – Likert scales

  11. Organizations Where Participants were Recruited • Father Peter Young’s Housing, Industry, and Treatment Network (PYHIT) • The Fortune Society • Exodus Transitional Community (ETC) • The Women’s Prison Association (WPA) • The Osborne Association • The Center for Community Alternatives (CCA) • The Syracuse Recovery Community Service Program (SRCSP)

  12. Select Sample Characteristics

  13. Measuring the Helper Orientation • I often share my past experiences to help others avoid making the same mistakes I made. • I am a good role model for other former prisoners who are trying to go straight.

  14. Measuring the Helper Orientation (cont.) • I act as a mentor of sorts for prisoners and former prisoners that need help to get back on their feet. • I plan to pursue (or am currently pursuing) a career where I can give back and help other people such as former prisoners, youth in trouble with the law, or people with drug/alcohol addictions.

  15. Plan to Pursue Career Helping Others

  16. The Helper/Wounded Healer Orientation Scale

  17. Factors Related to the Helper Orientation? • Demographics – • Age, gender, race/ethnicity • Social bonds – • Family and friends, education, full-time job, remorse • Criminal history – • time served, # felony convictions, violent felony conviction, supervision status • Program - voluntarily attend, time involved • Group identification • Perceptions of stigma (personal) • Normalization of prison experience in neighborhood where grew up

  18. Correlates of Helper Orientation

  19. Regression Analysis Explaining the Helper Orientation

  20. Importance of Helper Orientation? • Criminality • Criminal attitude • Recidivism • Forecast of rearrest in next 3 years • Well-being • Satisfaction with life • Self-esteem

  21. Correlations Between Helper Orientation and Outcomes

  22. Regression Analyses Explaining Well-being

  23. Regression Analyses Explaining Criminality

  24. Formerly Incarcerated Persons as Program Staff • 29 completed questionnaire • Age: Mean = 42.59 • Gender • 18 male, 11 female • Race/ethnicity • 15 Black, non-Latino, 12 Latino, 2 White, non-Latino • Time served: Mean = 119 months • Violent felony conviction (lifetime): 50% • Supervision status (none): 69%

  25. Comparison of Staff and Program Participants

  26. Summary of Findings • Many formerly incarcerated persons strongly endorse the helper orientation • Helpers are remorseful, identify strongly with others, are not under supervision, and are Black, non-Latino • Helping helps the helper • Positive relationship with well-being • Negative relationship with criminality • Findings especially strong for staff

  27. Research Implications • Document the growing role of formerly incarcerated persons as helpers, wounded healers and professional ex-s • Learn more about mutual-help groups and mentoring among formerly incarcerated persons • Study the effectiveness of mutual-help for both the helpers and recipients of help

  28. Policy Implications • The helper orientation transforms formerly incarcerated persons from being part of “the problem” into part of “the solution” as they give back • Devise ways of creating more helpers • Make opportunities to engage in mutual-help more widely available • Provide aid and support to promote the completion of certification programs and college degrees

  29. Lifers Public Safety Steering Committee at Graterford, PA • “One ensures change by assisting in the efforts to change others” (2004, p. 60) • “Society should begin to use the experience, knowledge, insight, and expertise of transformed ex-offenders to do the work that members of the community and those in positions of authority are not equipped to do” (2004, p. 65).

More Related