180 likes | 281 Views
In spite of the declining GDP…growing per capita income is feasible. 4.EXPLAINING RAGUSA’S RISE, PROSPERITY AND DECLINE. Location+Naval Power or Policies? a) Good Governance b) Strong Doing Business climate c) Prudent finances d) a sufficiently “fair” social policy
E N D
In spite of the declining GDP…growing per capita income is feasible
4.EXPLAINING RAGUSA’S RISE, PROSPERITY AND DECLINE Location+Naval Power or Policies? a) Good Governance b) Strong Doing Business climate c) Prudent finances d) a sufficiently “fair” social policy e)minimal military , maximal diplomacy
4 a.GOOD GOVERNANCE • Not a democracy (low VO) but at time comparatively benevolent oligarchy (Grubisa ’11) • Felt need “to improve institutions [as] stability and prosperity only way to strengthen city” (Krekic ’80) • Steady increase in role of rich merchants, upward mobility (Krekic, Luetic, Vekaric ,Zlatar) • Lot of evidence on effective ROL
4b.FAVORABLE “DOING BUSINESS” CLIMATE • Stipetic (00) details early economic philosophy , market and business friendly • Diversis(1440) “ the first permanent institution …to preserve justice and order among … merchants and customers, foreigners or citizens” • The acid-test of this: Ragusa courts ruled against own citizens in favor of foreign claimants: seized assets of bankrupt Paboras, conveyed to Peruzzi Bank, etc. • Ragusan Noble Bunic embezzled Sultan´s Balkan taxes, Ragusa court seized his assets. • Bojovic( ’98 ) recount numerous similar instances
WHAT DID PERUZZI DO WITH PABORA MONEY ?? • BY 1450 PERUZZI BANK OF FLORENCE WENT BANKRUPT • PERUZZIS LATER EMIGRATED TO US AND -------
4b…EARLY MARKET INSTITUTIONS • Benedikt (Benko) Kotruljevic(1440) now shown by scholars as first to develop double-entry bookkeeping– also justify interest as price of capital(early Austrian?) importance of credit to fuel trade, against usury laws if < 5-6% • Notary and contract registration rules, agencies as early as 1200 • Bankruptcy laws and procedures : avoid Debtor’s Prison solution, instead “help debtor overcome inability to pay [promote ] future doing business together” Palic (08)
4.c.PRUDENT FINANCES • History lit. virtually unanimous on financial prudence of state- debt problems rarely mentioned , minimal • Data to test this only available for 1800 (Tab. 3), in theory Arhiv has full books • Monetary stability claimed by most, apparently little debasement, low inflation , but no hard data to test • Banking : Zecca or mint a bank-like institution, minted coins, appears to have done lending to state, large “corporations” (bratovstva), held official deposits.BUT more research needed for fuller picture
TESTING SOME FISCAL HYPOTHESES WITH TAB.3 • BUDGET OF 1800 SURPLUS=10% REV.-this at a time long past “Golden Years” • DEBT PAYMENTS 1.7% :cf Kormer(95) for 25 mediaeval states17-36% • IN FACT NET ASSET POSITION VERY STRONG: DIVIDENDS ON DEPOSITS ABROAD 25.3% OF REV.!! ( held in “MONTI” of Italian banks and Vienna…Ragusa did not play the “Full Monti” …and won ) • HYP. ON SOCIAL FAIRNESS, LOW MILITARY, HIGH DIPLOMACY ALSO CONFIRMED … BUT ONLY FOR THE 1800 PERIOD!
4.d. A “SUFFICIENTLY” FAIR SOCIAL POLICY • NOT EQUITABLE, BUT FAIR COMPARED TO OTHER STATES • SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE: streets paved in 14th c., sanitation , water supplies (viz. Onofrio Fountain now for tourists!), schools, hospitals, hospices, orphanages, poor-houses • GRAIN RESERVES(RUPE): a case of good mercantilism ? • HEALTH-CARE: state-salaried physicians, hospitals, FIRST quarantine in region ,1377 • EDUCATION: Tab. 3, 6.8% high for the time.
4e. MINMAX OPTIMIZATION:Minimal Military… • HISTORIAN’S CONSENSUS:SMALL ARMY, NAVY, MIL. EXPENDITURES. Luetic(69) entire chapter “Most Modest Naval Fleet”; numbers vague, perhaps 10-20 ships cf. 100-200 merchant fleet– Venetian Period small war-time obligation=1 ship per 30 Venetian • TAB.3 FOR 1800 CONSISTENT WITH THIS. Army+Fortifications 12.2%-- though some of Admin., Police could be “defense”. • HOWEVER: COULD HAVE BEEN MUCH MORE IN EARLIEST PERIODS TO BUILD CREDIBILITY-15 MONTH Saracen siege in 866-7;Carter(72) claims Balkan Kings “discouraged from attack by the likely high costs of breaching the fortifications”. AN INTERESTING HYP. FOR RESEARCH
4e. MINMAX OPTIMIZATION:Maximal Diplomacy • LITERATURE REPLETE WITH PRAISE FOR RAGUSA/DUBROVNIK DIPLOMACY: Berkovic(09) “ in defense of independence, econ. growth [resorted] almost exclusively to diplomatic means and skills”; Carter (72) “in diplomatic affairs Dubrovnik was a past –master”; height of byzantine intrigue late 17th.c , Ragusa was city of “Le Sette Bandieri” playing off seven powerful states with treaties, tributes, constant negotiations ( see Diplomat Vucic!) • HARD DATA?up to seventy consulates; TAB 3: 11% exp. on last; huge 32% on tributes and “good relations expenses”; Fig.9 ,Customs revenues highest during regional wars!!
5. CONCLUSIONS • FINDINGS SUBJECT TO DATA QUALITY… • RAGUSA IN 14-16 c. VERY PROSPEROUS AND IMPORTANT STATE IN EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN DESPITE TINY SIZE-based on entrepot trade,first Balkans-Italy , then Levant-Europe • LOCATION WAS FAVORABLE BUT MORE IMPORTANT WERE POLICIES: Good governance, business-friendly, Rule-of-Law, enlightened social policy, prudent finances low debt, skilled diplomacy substitutes for military expenditures
5.CONCLUSIONS …cont’d. • 17TH c. DECLINE DUE TO CAPE OF GOOD HOPE ROUTE 1500, OVERWHELMING ADVANTAGE OF NEW NAVAL POWERS: PORT. NETH. ENGL.; RISE OF W.EUROPE • HOWEVER, IMPACT NOT IMMEDIATE AS OFTEN THOUGHT: PEAK OF RAGUSA SHIPPING TONNAGE ALMOST CENTURY LATER • RAG=VENICE? LITERALLY FLEET SIZE DID REACH THIS FOR SHORT PERIOD, BUT ONLY WHEN VENICE WAS AT ITS LOWEST AFTER WARS. NEVERTHELESS WITH 1/20TH SIZE OF VEN. EVEN BEING CLOSE AND A TOUGH COMPETITOR WAS A GREAT ACHIEVEMENT
Table 4 Quantitative Tests of Most Common Hypotheses about Economy of Ragusa
FUTURE RESEARCH • THE LIMITED AND IMPERFECT DATA SET FROM SECONDARY SOURCES IMPLIES ABOVE CONCLUSIONS SHOULD BE CHECKED WITH PRIMARY ARCHIVAL DATA • IN ADDITION , A NUMBER OF NEW HYPOTHESES HAVE BEEN RAISED BY THE ANALYSIS (TAB.5), AND COULD BE RESEARCHED IN ARCHIVES: 2 examples: was silver period also a high-growth period albeit at lower levels of incomes? ; what happened to GDP, GDPpc, POP , in the “ decline “ centuries- did revival of shipping 1750 on raise GDPpc as POP fell ?