1 / 20

Sustainable Biofuels: Baselines, Uncertainties & Values

Sustainable Biofuels: Baselines, Uncertainties & Values. Timothy M. Smith Director, Initiative for Sustainable Enterprise Associate Professor, Bioproducts & Biosystems Engineering University of Minnesota MIT/Ford/Shell Research Workshop Dearborn, MI June 9, 2009.

aricin
Download Presentation

Sustainable Biofuels: Baselines, Uncertainties & Values

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sustainable Biofuels: Baselines, Uncertainties & Values Timothy M. Smith Director, Initiative for Sustainable Enterprise Associate Professor, Bioproducts & Biosystems Engineering University of Minnesota MIT/Ford/Shell Research Workshop Dearborn, MI June 9, 2009

  2. The really big questions… How do we feed and secure energy for 9 billion people, while… • Stabilizing global climate change? • Protecting important (high-value) ecosystems? • Reducing poverty and income disparity? “Science” alone can’t provide the answers!

  3. Sustainable Biofuels Federal & State Policy: • Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) adopted by EPA to implement provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. • State-level blending mandates, renewable portfolio standards and low carbon fuel standards (CA,11 Northeastern states and 9 Midwestern states pursuing these policies) • Waxman-Markey, American Clean Energy and Security Act • Biofuels Interagency Working Group (Obama initiative; May 9, 2009) Voluntary Standards Development: • Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels • Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance • Biofuels and Sustainable Development (with Global Bioenergy Partnership) • SCS-001/ANSI - Draft National Standard • IEA – Task Force 40 • National Biofuels Action Plan – USDA

  4. Examples of Advantages and Disadvantages of Biofuels • Advantages of Biofuels: • Reduction of imported crude oil • Renewability • Rural development • Use of waste material • Reduction in greenhouse gas • emissions • Disadvantages of Biofuels: • Energy intensive production • Runoff of agrochemicals to water • Use of limited water supplies • Threatened and endangered species • Increased soil erosion • Land conversion effects • Introduction of invasive species (Currant 2009)

  5. Global Biofuel Blending Targets and Production * EIA 2008 U.S. Ethanol (2022)*: Prod: 15.3 – 17.1 bil. Gallons; approx. 2.5 times 2008 levels

  6. Biomass in the U.S. (A. Milbrandt 2005) Top 5 Biomass States: Iowa 8.3% Illinois 6.7% MN 6.2% Missouri 4.4% ND 4.1% Top 5 29.5% Minnesota: Expected to produce 1.7 – 2.1 billion “advanced biofuels” by 2022 (Smith & Suh 2008) Would need all crop residues, switchgrass from CRP and forest residues!!!

  7. (Wisner 2007) | UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, Department of Bio-based Products

  8. Global Biofuel Blending Targets and Production Feedstock for 30 bil. gallons per year** * EIA 2008; **Kline and Oladosu (2008) U.S. Ethanol (2022)*: Prod: 15.3 – 17.1 bil. Gallons; approx. 2.5 times 2008 levels Imports: 2.4 – 3.1 bil. Gallons; approx. 5 times 2008 levels EU (2020): Require 20-50% imports to reach 2020 blending target Sept 2008 – target amended to 4 percent from today’s crop-based biofuels. 45% GHG savings over fossil fuels rising to 60% in 2015. Latin America (2017): BrazilArgentinaColombia CBI

  9. Sustainability Impacts of Biofuels • Fossil Fuel Use and Depletion • Net Energy Balance • Global Warming

  10. Environmental Impacts of Biofuel Feedstocks

  11. Environmental Impacts of Biofuels • Fossil Fuel Use and Depletion • Net Energy Balance • Global Warming • Land Use

  12. Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt (Fargione et al. 2008)

  13. Lifecycle GWP of Renewable Fuels (EPA-420-F-09-024, May 2009)

  14. EPA Lifecycle GHG Emission Reduction Results for Renewable Fuels (EPA-420-F-09-024, May 2009)

  15. Environmental Impacts of Biofuels • Fossil Fuel Use and Depletion • Net Energy Balance • Global Warming • Land Use • Air Quality • Food-for-Fuel • Soil Quality • Water Quality • Water Availability • Biodiversity • Invasive Species • Socio-Economic Aspects

  16. Non GWP Environmental Impacts (Zah et al. 2007)

  17. The Promise of Algae? Water, Energy & Costs (Muhs et al. 2009)

  18. Carbon Intensity of Petroleum Transport Fuels Unnasch. S., et al. (2009). Typical Baseline Values used: - Gasoline: 92 – 97 g/CO2e/MJ - Diesel: ≈ 82 g/CO2e/MJ Point estimates from 95 - 115 g/CO2e/MJ Uncertainty brings the petroleum baseline to a potential 90 - 130 g/CO2e/MJ depending on: - Overseas vented natural gas- Oil sands processing tech.- Treatment of co-product electricity from cogeneration- Method used to determine refinery emissions- Treatment of residual oil and coke co-products

  19. Concluding Thoughts Policy will play a major role in sustainable biofuels development, but not the only role. Private voluntary standards and certifications will attempt to address the multiple trade-offs difficult for governmental policies to address. We are very early in the process… criteria and implementation mechanisms are far from being determined – let alone “standardized” within a handful of “winning” (legitimate) private governance initiatives. Nearly as much uncertainty exists within extant petroleum-based systems as developing bio-based systems (access, security, transport, land-use change, process technologies, etc.). Time horizons matter Much more work is needed to create the data infrastructure and institutions necessary to handle multiple viable/credible sustainability standards/policies for biofuels. Any normalization or weighting of environmental/social/economic factors feeding standards (policy or market driven) are subjective and based on the stakeholders engaged in decision-making.

  20. Questions and Contact Tim Smith 612.624.6755 timsmith@umn.edu

More Related