360 likes | 631 Views
Radical Cystectomy and Orthotopic Ileal W- Neobladder : Functional Results and Early Experience. Hassan Farsi, Anmar Nassir , Hesham Saada, Rami Salawi . Bladder caner. 63,210 new cases Male to female 3:1 All cancer cases Men 4 th common cancer 6.6% Women
E N D
Radical Cystectomyand OrthotopicIleal W- Neobladder : Functional Results and Early Experience Hassan Farsi, Anmar Nassir, Hesham Saada, Rami Salawi
Bladder caner • 63,210 new cases • Male to female 3:1 • All cancer cases • Men • 4th common cancer 6.6% • Women • 9thcommon cancer 2.4% % • Age • middle-aged and elderly people.
Bladder Cancer - Pathology • TCC • >90% • SCC • 5-7% • chronic irritation • stones, foleycatheter • Schistosomiasis] • ADENOCARCINOMA • 1-2% • urachal carcinoma, • cystitis glandularis • Rule out metastatic source. • STAGING • Superficial versus Infiltrating Tumor • Localized versus Locally Extensive or Metastatic
INDICATIONS of RADICAL CYSTECTOMY • Muscle-invasive bladder cancer • Recurrent T1 disease or CIS unresponsive to intra-vesical chemotherapy • Palliative procedure when the symptoms of the disease are severe • Severe hematuria • Severe frequency
Indications of Urinary Diversion • Dangerous bladder • Bladder cancer • Pelvic Malignancy • Useless bladder • Neurogenic • Contracted (T.B,B.Irrad) • Vesicle fistula • Absent bladder • Congenital anomalies (Ectopia) Abol-enein,H 2000
Goals of Continent Urinary Diversion • Construction of a complaint reservoir Detubularisation and Double folding • Protection of the upper tracts • Controlled reservoir emptying (continence) Abol-enein,H 2000
Ideal Orthotopic Bladder Substitute • Technical simplicity • Constructed from a minimal bowel length • Complaint • Protects the upper tract. • Continent. • Minimal metabolic and nutritional consequences Abol-enein,H 2000
REFLUXING OR ANTIREFLUXING ANASTOMOSIS • Considerable controversy • Potential advantage of anti reflux as long as it does not add a risk of obstruction. • Ghoneim, 2002 • No Explicit evidence of its necessity • Anti refluxing Uretero-intestinal anastomosis in low pressure high capacity reservoir is unnecessary. • Prospective controlled randomized study is required • Pantuk,2000 & Hohnfeller,2002
Aim of The Work To assess our experience and results of patients undergoing: Radical Cystectomy and Orthotopic Neobladder Reconstruction
Radical Cystectomy & W-Neobladder. SLEMT 5cm two long chimney with direct anastomosis Radical Cystectomy & W-Neobladder.
Post Operative Evaluation • Histopathologcal examination of the Cystectomy specimens • Follow up evaluation on regular intervals • Renal profiles • CBC • UA and Cx • U/S and /or IVU • Pouchogram • when indicated • CT • Bone scan • Endoscopy • AUG
Renal and electrolytes profiles Anti Reflux Refluxing
Pouchogrphy + VCUG + IVU 5cm Two Long Chimney With Direct Anastomosis
Early Post Op Urethroileal Leakage 2 wk More Foleys catheter drainage 3 wk post operative
Early Post OpBroken Unrecognized External Ureteral Stent SLEMT EASY CYSTOSCOPY+ STENT REMOVAL EASY LOCALIZATION OF BOTH URETERAL ORIFICE
Early Post OpBroken External Ureteral Stent 5cm Two Long Chimney With Direct Anastomosis Antegrade insertion of Guide wire then Cystoscopy and URS and removal of DJ Stent
Reflux 5cm two long chimney with direct anastomosis
Conclusions • Radical Cystectomy, followed by the construction of orthotopic W-shaped ilealNeobladder results in a near-normal-functioning orthotopic reservoir that can be safely offered to Suitable patients. • Well designed Prospective controlled randomized study regarding refluxing and anti-refluxing anastomosisis required.