130 likes | 250 Views
Rethinking the teacher’s role for building authentic learning partnerships: Learning from an experiment in student-driven large group teaching. Faculty of Education – Te Kura Toi Tangata. Dr Glenys Forsyth. Lecturer Department of Sport and Leisure Studies. Dorothy Spiller.
E N D
Rethinking the teacher’s role for building authentic learning partnerships: Learning from an experiment in student-driven large group teaching Faculty of Education – Te Kura ToiTangata DrGlenys Forsyth Lecturer Department of Sport and Leisure Studies Dorothy Spiller Teaching Development Unit Faculty of Education 2013
Background http://www.flickr.com/photos/27237408@N03/4530228887/ huangjiahui CC BY-SA 2.0
Inter-linked learning spaces Lecturers Tutors Small Groups Assessments Readings Online activities Peer Study Groups Small Groups Assessments Tutors Readings Assessments Readings Assessments Moodle Panopto Podcasts Assessments Readings Social Networks
Constructivism █ Slices of Light █▀ ▀ ▀ (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
Method • Electronic submissions on ‘obesity as a public health issue’. • 250 word commentary on each submission. • Collated and themes identified. http://www.flickr.com/photos/87635098@N00/188297063/Joe_13 CC BY-ND 2.0
Evaluation and analysis • Observation • Teacher reflections • Student focus group • Student submission • Observation • Teacher reflections • Student focus group • Student submissions not quite clear on the concept / woodleywonderworks / CC BY 2.0
Summary of findings: Teacher reflection / observation Observation • Preparing for the discussion • “motivated and ready for discussion…indeed it was evident that a great deal of thought had taken place prior to coming to the class” • Student engagement • “there was a high level of engagement … overall there was a great range and depth of discussion and debate about the different findings and views presented.” • Teacher reflection • Degree of excitement & anticipation by students. • Teacher still shaped the proceedings. • Greater engagement by students however • Physical space • Students continue to seek authentication of their contribution to class
Summary of findings: Focus Group Sharing ideas • “the learning was different because it was interesting to hear other opinions”. Personal relevance to the content • “the submissions made prior to the lectures were things that struck something with you…they meant something to you”. The facilitator’s role • “…built the environment and encouraged the people”. Learning through active participation • “for those of us who learn visually or through discussion, this process was beneficial to learning”. The different faces of learning • “We’re learning about respect of each other…about individual growth and relationships in class and teaching”.
Summary of findings: Submissions Poor information-seeking skills Google & Wikipedia as authoritative sources of information Random selection Did not demonstrate systematic evaluation of the information <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/49462908@N00/3951143570/">Stéfan</a> via <a href="http://compfight.com">Compfight</a> <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/">cc</a>
Conclusions • Value of engaging students as partners in their learning: need to coach and prepare students for this role (eg information-seeking skills) • Potential for genuine student-led learning in the lecture context. • Embedding the practice of learning partnerships throughout a course. • Teachers and students explicitly deal with shifts in their identity and their role in the learning experience. a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/12146665@N00/2702151942/">UBC Library</a> via <a href="http://compfight.com">Compfight</a> <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/">cc</a>
References Baxter Magolda, M.B. (2004). Evolution of a constructivist conceptualisation of epistemological reflection. Educational Psychologist, 39, 31-42. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (3rd ed.). Buckingham, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press. Cooper, J.L., & Robinson, P. (2000). The argument for making large classes seem small. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 81, 5-16. Judd, T., & Kennedy, G. (2011). Expediency-based practice? Medical students’ reliance on Google and Wikipedia for biomedical inquiries. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 351-360. doi:10.111/j.1467-8535.2009.01019.x McWilliam, E. (2008). Unlearning how to teach. Innovations in Education International, 45(3), 263-269. Phillips, D.C (1995). The good, the bad and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. EducationalResearcher, 24(97). 5-12. Skelton, A. (2005). Understanding teaching excellence in higher education: Towards a criticalapproach. London: Routledge. Van Note Chism, N. (2006). Challenging traditional assumptions and rethinking learning spaces. In D.G. Oblinger (Ed.). Learning spaces (pp. 2.2-2.12). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Yazedjian, A. & Kolkhorst, B.B. (2007). Implementing small group activities in large lecture classes. College Teaching, 55(4) 164-169.
The University of Waikato Private Bag 3105Hamilton 3240New Zealand 0800 WAIKATOwww.waikato.ac.nz