380 likes | 517 Views
Widening the Scope of Adaptive Optics. Matthew Britton. The Seeing Limit. Atmospheric Turbulence. Wavefront phase. Diffraction limited image. Seeing limited image. Diffraction limit. Seeing limit. Seeing limit (x40). Point source Sensitivity. Point source Sensitivity. Angular
E N D
Widening the Scope of Adaptive Optics Matthew Britton
Wavefront phase Diffraction limited image Seeing limited image
Diffraction limit Seeing limit Seeing limit (x40) Point source Sensitivity Point source Sensitivity Angular Resolution Angular Resolution ~ D2 ~ D4 ~ D0 ~ D Long Exposure PSFs
Neptune (Keck) NGC 7469 (CFHT) NGC 3603(VLT)
Modeling the PSF OTFoa=OTFgs* ATF
Turbulence theory Cn2 profile measurements Observations of a 21” Binary Guide Star Companion OTFgs * ATF= OTFoa
Fitting the Observation I(r) = OTFgs(r) + d * OTFoa(r) * exp{i q * r} d = differential photometry q = differential astrometry
Differential Photometry Relative Intensity
Laser Tilt Indeterminacy Pilkington 1987 (Nature)
Keck LGS observation Of M5 (Courtesy of the CfAO Treasury Survey)
A Preliminary Comment Field dependence of the AO system performance is a function of: • Aperture diameter • Observing wavelength • Guide star configuration • How the adaptive mirrors are deployed • Zenith angle • Turbulence conditions (-> time)
Single Laser AO (SLGLAO) Poor to moderate performance over a modest field FOV = 70” (D / 30 m)(90 km / h)
Ground Layer AO (GLAO) Poor performance Field uniformity
Laser Tomography AO (LTAO) Good performance on axis
Multiconjugate AO (MCAO) Good performance over 30” field
Multiobject AO (MOAO) Intermediate performance over 5’ field
Conclusions There are a number of ways to provide wide field AO compensation. • Postprocessing using turbulence profiles • XXAO At least one of them is likely to work for your observations…