270 likes | 449 Views
SCH Medics Journal Club Unexpected collapse in apparently healthy newborns – a prospective study of a missing cohort of neonatal deaths and near death events. Steph Borg 17 May 2012. SUPC is rare in infants How often does it occur? What are the causes? Jessop guidelines include
E N D
SCH Medics Journal ClubUnexpected collapse in apparently healthy newborns – a prospective study of a missing cohort of neonatal deaths and near death events Steph Borg 17 May 2012
SUPC is rare in infants • How often does it occur? • What are the causes? • Jessop guidelines include • Immediate care of the newborn • Bed sharing and co-sleeping guideine
Search Sudden OR unexpected AND Neonatal OR postnatal AND Collapse or death Limit to English Language and humans and age <1 month 199 results
Result Unexpected collapse in apparently healthy newborns – a prospective study of a missing cohort of neonatal deaths and near death event J-C Becher, S Bhushan & A Lyon Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2012 97:F30-F34
Analysis “We sought to establish the population incidence of sudden unexpected postnatal collapse (SUPC) in apparently healthy infants within the UK to describe situational factors and the cause for collapse was determined” • Population – • infants ≥37/40 • Apgar score of ≥ 8 at 5mins • Collapse within 12hrs of birth in hospital requiring resuscitation with PPV and died or received ongoing intensive care
Analysis • Risk factors • Maternal sedation • Breastfeeding/prone position • Unattended • Underlying disease/pathology • Outcomes • Incidence of death and collapse • Identification of cause of death • Neurological follow up at 1 year
Analysis • Yes • A method of establishing an association between exposure and outcome by following a population over time
Analysis • Cases referred to BPSU over 13 months 2008-2009 • Active surveillance via network of 3000 paediatricians • Response rate 94.6% • When cases identified further information collected from clinicians • Could not verify if all cases reported • Study incidence may be underestimate
Analysis Exposure to risk factors identified retrospectively from BPSU collected data Ix performed decided by clinical time at the time – not consistent Cases were anonymised to study team
Analysis • Study incidence may be underestimated • 4 excluded cases due to uncertain eligibility • Ix to cause of collapse not always successful • 1 death – no cause found and no PM • 5 cases no cause identified • Clinical judgment of cause where no objective cause identified • Outcome data for all surviving cases available
All infants surviving to discharge followed up at 1 yr with neurological assessment • Is age 1 yr too early to assess for long term developmental/neurological outcome?
Results • 91 cases referred, • 32 errors • 10 duplications • 4 excluded • 45 infants of SUPC included • 12 (27%) died • 33 survived to discharge • Population incidence of SUPC in first 12 hours 0.05/1000 (1 in 19000) term live births • Mortality 0.01/1000 (1/72000) term live births • Where no underlying disease or abnormality id’d population incidence 0.035/1000 (1/29000) term live births
Results • Characteristics of mother, labour and delivery • Infants with an underlying condition (n=15) • 10 (67%) primiparous • Non smokers and healthy • 6 SVD, 3 instrumental, 6 LSCS • Infants without an underlying condition (n=30) • 23 (77%) primiparous • 2 smokers, 4 PIH, 8 health professionals
Results • Characteristics of infant • 22 (49%) male • Mean gestational age 40/40 (range 37-42 weeks) • Mean birthweight 3328g (range 2260g-4030g) • Apgar of 8 or above at 5 mins • Routine postnatal care
Results – Following collapse • All infants required PPV • 22 received CPR • 10 received resuscitation drugs • 2 died immediately • 1 sepsis • 1 TGA • 43 admitted to neonatal unit • Median pH within 1 hr 6.98 ( IQR 6.8-7.18) • Median base deficit 17.7mmol/l (IQR 11.4-23.5) • 23 multiorgan dysfunction • 17 single organ dysfunction
Results - deaths • 12/45 infants died • 10/12 underwent postmortem • Underlying cause found in 5 (50%) • 2 sepsis; TGA; unidentified metabolic condition; parvovirus • No underlying cause found • Apparent asphyxiation as per pathologist/clinician • 2/10 no PM • hyoplastic left heart on echo pre mortem • collapse following presumed suffocation – consent for PM not given
Results - survivors • 33/45 survived to discharge • 8 (24%) neurological abnormalities at 1yr f/u • 3 had underlying cause for collapse identified • Zellweger’s syndrome • Cerebral infarction • Culture negative sepsis
Results – survivors • 30 infants with no underlying cause/disease • 19/24 presumed accidental suffocation survived to discharge • 5 had neurological abnormality at 1 yr f/u • 3 with cerebral palsy • 1 with probable cerebral palsy • 1 with mild global delay and hypotonia • 6 infants with no cause identified normal at follow up • (but 1 died..)
Results There is no statistical analysis in this study
Results Results as accurate as medical records kept Clinical decisions on cause of collapse may be subjective 6/45 infants no cause for collapse identified
Will the results help me locally • Yes – Jessop provides care to term babies with Apgars >8 at 5 mins • Currently have pathways in our guidelines re • Co-sleeping and bed sharing • Prevention, detection and management of known risks of hypoglycaemia, GBS
The first study to document the population incidence in the UK of SUPC in infants assessed as being healthy at birth Previous case series document risks of accidental suffocation