1 / 6

strengths

strengths. weaknesses. SWOT - ANALYSIS RESULTS OF ECOLOGICAL TARGETS GROUP. opportunities. threats. strengths. weaknesses. - Educational to scientists & decison makers - Integration of knowledge & international cooperation - General understanding of how the open Baltic works

astro
Download Presentation

strengths

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. strengths weaknesses SWOT - ANALYSIS RESULTS OF ECOLOGICAL TARGETS GROUP opportunities threats

  2. strengths weaknesses - Educational to scientists & decison makers - Integration of knowledge & international cooperation - General understanding of how the open Baltic works - Development of strategies (fish model) - Too much precision and too quantitative for managers. Make cost/ investments relative to base model - Move from hard data to fuzzy logic methods? - Models not linked in way managers require - Cannot accommodate fine resolution and minute processes, e.g. N & P links. - Mismatch between geographical units and those used by WFD - Data inadequate/ missing - Too few targets (nutrients, Secchi, anoxia, fish reduction). - Coast not included. - Response time of system to measures. opportunities threats - May be helpful in implementing WFD as a tool - Need to incorporate climate change effects - MARE to underpin WFD implementation - Save duplication - Integrate with other Baltic programmes - Export value to other semi-enclosed seas - Regionalisation of application and further development of tool. - Increase number of targets. - Coupling NEST to other ICZM models / sci models. - Top-down and bottom-up connection (sci-man) - Managers to believe the data produced - Science not sufficiently well-developed - Managers need educating regarding ‘ecological change’ - Duplicating effort with other initiatives - That MARE does not help to fullfil WFD - Maintenance? Long term perspective - Too much confidence in NEST: ‘keep thinking!’

  3. strengths - Educational to scientists & decison makers - Integration of knowledge & international cooperation - General understanding of how the open Baltic works - Development of strategies (fish model)

  4. weaknesses - Too much precision and too quantitative for managers. - Make cost/ investments relative to base model - Move from hard data to fuzzy logic methods? - Models not linked in way managers require (cause – effect) - Cannot accommodate fine resolution and minute processes, e.g. N & P links. - Mismatch between geographical units and those used by WFD - Data inadequate/ missing - Too few SMART targets (nutrients, Secchi, anoxia, fish reduction). - Coast not included. - Response time of system to measures.

  5. opportunities - May be helpful in implementing WFD as a tool - Need to incorporate climate change effects - MARE to underpin WFD implementation - Save duplication - Integrate with other Baltic programmes - Export value to other semi-enclosed seas - Regionalisation of application and further development of tool. - Increase number of targets. - Coupling NEST to other ICZM models / sci models. - Top-down and bottom-up connection (sci-man)- Open the architecture?

  6. threats - Managers to believe the data produced - Science not sufficiently well-developed - Managers need educating regarding ‘ecological change’ - Duplicating effort with other initiatives - That MARE does not help to fullfil WFD - Maintenance? Long term perspective - Too much confidence in NEST: ‘keep thinking!’

More Related