1 / 38

The post MFA Era and New Trade Rules

The post MFA Era and New Trade Rules. ITGLWF / TWARO Post MFA meeting Bangkok 5-9 September By Esther Busser, ICFTU. Current developments. Workers in textiles and clothing industries are facing loss of orders, factory closures, legislative or organizational changes and job losses.

aure
Download Presentation

The post MFA Era and New Trade Rules

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The post MFA Era and New Trade Rules ITGLWF / TWARO Post MFA meeting Bangkok 5-9 September By Esther Busser, ICFTU

  2. Current developments • Workers in textiles and clothing industries are facing loss of orders, factory closures, legislative or organizational changes and job losses. • This is caused by a major change in the trading system for textiles and clothing • Called the MFA phase out

  3. MFA • The MFA (multi fibre agreement) of 1974 put in place a quota system, in which developed countries distributed quota to developing countries. • This MFA was meant to protect the developed country textiles and clothing industries and to prevent job losses • It led to spread of production and to part of the production being set up in smaller developing countries, to make use of the quota in place.

  4. MFA quotas • Quotas are limits put on the amount of imports in different categories of garments • For example knitted t-shirts, woven sweaters, gloves) • And textiles such as for example knitted fabric, acrylic yarn, cotton fabric

  5. MFA quotas • Textiles and clothing producing countries were assigned a maximum quantity that they could legally export to the developed country markets of the US, EU, Canada and Norway • Quotas differed per country and per product

  6. MFA quotas • Quotas led to spread of production • Some countries reached their quota and thus companies looked for countries that still had quota left: sourcing followed quotas • Garment industries were created in countries because of quota availability

  7. MFA quotas • Quotas came at a cost • Governments often sold quotas • Governments sold the right to export • In the US 15% of the garment cost is estimated to be due to the cost of quota rights

  8. MFA phase out • In 1994, at the end of the Uruguay Round, it was decided to phase out the quotas. • The Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (ATC) replaced the MFA in 1995 and established the conditions to phase out all quotas on textiles and clothing. • The phase out period was 10 years and took place in four phases • Developed countries phased out the most important and effective part of the quotas (49%) only in the last phase of the 10 year period. • That is why there is such an impact now

  9. WTO • One of the main WTO principles is trade liberalization • By eliminating the trade barriers • These barriers constitute extra costs • Another core principle is non-discrimination (MFN and national treatment) • And a third principle is the enhancement of competition

  10. Trading system • The trading system is subject to barriers • Countries protect themselves to imports from other countries in three ways • Through tariffs • Through quotas • Trough non tariff barriers (NTBs) • The quotas have now disappeared but other barriers remain

  11. Trade Barriers • Other barriers to trade are tariffs and Non tariff barriers • Examples of NTBs are technical requirements and packaging requirements or sanitary measures in the case of food products • Tariffs can be based on the quantity of goods exported or on the value of exported goods, and increases the price of the exported good in the market • US average tariff on textiles and clothing is 15% • EU average tariff on textiles and clothing is 12%

  12. Tariff preferences • Countries receive preferential access to the EU and US market through lower tariffs than the most favoured nation (MFN) tariff. • The MFN principle is important in the WTO • The EU offers the GSP (General System of Preferences) scheme (unilateral) and Cotonou • The US offers AGOA (the African Growth and Opportunity Act) and CBI (Caribbean Basin Initiative)

  13. EU GSP • The GSP provides tariff preferences on sensitive and non-sensitive goods • General preferences • Everything but Arms for LDCs • Special preferences (sustainable development scheme) (ratification of 27 conventions on labour, environment and human rights)

  14. EU GSP rules of origin • Strict rules of origin • Product is wholly obtained in the beneficiary country • Non-originating material should be “sufficiently” worked or processed in the beneficiary country • Bilateral and regional cumulation • Utilization rate determines whether the country uses the preferences

  15. EU GSP utilization rates • Moldova: 95% • Pakistan: 79% • India: 77% • Nepal: 70% • China: 62% • Indonesia: 56% • Vietnam: 56% • Sri Lanka: 33%

  16. US • CBI: Caribbean Basin Initiative: quota and duty free access for a number of garments and textile products • AGOA: African Growth and Opportunity Act • Quota and duty free market access for thousands of products to the US from approved African countries (37) with an emphasis on garments • Garments account for 5.9% of Sub-Saharan exports under AGOA, after oil products 69.6%

  17. Canada GSP • New rules of origin since 2003 • Duty free and quota free access for textiles and clothing for LDCs with a 25% origin requirement • This has boosted LDC clothing exports • Particularly from Bangladesh and Cambodia

  18. Preference erosion • The preferences that developing countries receive at the moment are threatened by negotiations on tariff reductions, including on textiles and clothing • These negotiations are part of the Doha Development Round and are called NAMA negotiations

  19. NAMA negotiations • Non Agriculture Market Access • All products, including textiles, clothing and footwear • Negotiations for tariff reductions • Tariffs on textiles, clothing and footwear relatively high in the EU and US • Negotiations focused on steep tariff reductions

  20. Consequences • Access will be cheaper, less tariffs paid, so product will be cheaper • Advantageous for competitive countries • Disadvantageous for preference receiving countries i.e. those that managed to keep some market share due to preferential access, which makes their imports cheaper than those of main competitors

  21. Consequences • Can be disadvantageous for domestic industries • Reduces government revenue • Reduces national policy space

  22. NAMA negotiations • Tariff reduction formula, Swiss type or simple Swiss • Sectoral negotiations: including textiles, clothing and footwear • Zero tariffs • Informal negotiations • Tariff binding

  23. Tariff revenue as percentage of tax revenues • Bangladesh 22.6% • India 18.5% • Pakistan 12.2% • Philippines 17.2% • Sri Lanka 11.3% • Thailand 10.4% • Vietnam 18.1% • China 9.5%

  24. Average bound tariff levels • China 9.1% • Hong Kong 0.0% • India 34.3% • Indonesia 35.6% • Pakistan 35.3% • Philippines 23.4% • Thailand 24.2% • Bangladesh 42.9% • Sri Lanka 19.2%

  25. Tariff reduction with simple Swiss formula (coefficient 30)(simple average) • China approx. 7.5% • Hong Kong approx. 0.0% • India approx. 16% • Indonesia approx. 16% • Pakistan approx. 16% • Philippines approx. 13% • Thailand approx. 13% • Bangladesh approx. 17.5% • Sri Lanka approx. 12%

  26. Binding of tariffs • Bangladesh 3.0% • Nepal 99.3% • Maldives 96.7% • Sri Lanka 28.3% • Macao (China) 15.6%

  27. Safeguards • Safeguards can be applied to protect countries’ domestic industries against Chinese imports • Such safeguards can ease the effects of the phase out, as in particular Chinese exports cause distortions of the system at the moment • Safeguards can be found in the WTO accession documents of China, in the general safeguard provision of the WTO and in the WTO anti-dumping agreement

  28. Safeguards • The China WTO accession document contains provisions for safeguards • Art. 16 Accession Document (Protocol) provides for safeguards for all products • Para 242 of the Working Party report provides for safeguards on textiles and clothing

  29. Para 242 • To be applied in the case of market disruption due to Chinese imports of textiles and clothing • Consultations with China can take place on the basis of the existence or threat of market disruption and the role of Chinese products in that disruption • Consultations would be held within 30 days of receipt of the request • Upon receipt of the request, China will hold shipments in the relevant categories to a level no greater than 7.5% (6% for wool products) above the amount entered during the first 12 months of the most recent 14 months preceding the month in which the request was made.

  30. Para 242 • A consultation period of 90 days follows • If no agreement can be reached, the export limits in the relevant categories will remain • The export limits will be in place from the day of request till 30 December or (if less than 3 months remain) for a period of 12 months • No measures can be taken under Para 242 and art 16 of the Protocol at the same time

  31. Para 242 • Invoked by Turkey on 42 items since the beginning of this year • Argentina has the legal framework in place but has not invoked safeguards yet • Brazil considers safeguards • The EU and US have invoked them. The EU has reached an agreement with China during the consultation period • The South African trade unions have asked for a safeguard

  32. US safeguards • Surge in Chinese imports of textiles and apparel to the US of 47.95% over first three months of 2005 • Safeguards on 3 categories: cotton knit shirts and blouses, cotton trousers, and cotton and man-made fibre underwear. Increases in volume of over 1,000% • Four additional safeguards were invoked at the end May

  33. EU-China agreement • Formal consultations were launched with China in two of nine categories (t-shirts (187%) and flax yarn (56%)) under investigation in the EU • Have led to the displacement of exports from Morocco, Tunisia, Romania, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh

  34. EU-China agreement • 10 categories of Chinese textiles exports to the EU are limited to between 8 and 12.5% growth above a specified base period for the next three years • Import restrictions on the two categories (t-shirts and flax yarn) were dropped. • Categories include: cotton fabrics (71% increase), t-shirts (199%), flax yarn (55%), pullovers (530%), trousers (413%), blouses (256%), bed linen (158%), bras (110%), dresses (219%), table and kitchen linen (64%).

  35. EU-China agreement • Quantitative limits will last till the end of 2007, followed by a transition period • The EU might still apply safeguards on categories not covered by the agreement, however with restraint • The agreement will bring certainty and more time to adapt • The agreement will benefit developing countries that compete with China

  36. EU-China agreement • New discussions have emerged, as many Chinese goods have been held by customs • Retailers versus textiles and clothing producers in European countries • Goods will probably be unblocked

  37. General safeguard measure • Provides temporary protection to products and sectors that are seriously injured from import competition • This is subject to a number of procedures such as the determination of serious injury, consultations with affected trading partners and in some cases the payment of compensation • More complicated than the China accession safeguards

  38. Anti-dumping agreement • Governments are allowed to take action against dumping • They have to prove that there is dumping and that there is genuine injury to the domestic industry • They can then impose an import duty on the specific product from a particular country

More Related