1 / 15

BAD PHILOSOPHY One of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,

BAD PHILOSOPHY One of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science, in this case astrophysics, was made in 1835 by the prominent French philosopher Auguste Comte. In his Cours de la Philosophie Positive he wrote :

ayala
Download Presentation

BAD PHILOSOPHY One of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BAD PHILOSOPHY One of the worst intellectual prognostications regarding the limits of science, in this case astrophysics, was made in 1835 by the prominent French philosopher AugusteComte. In his Cours de la Philosophie Positive he wrote: On the subject of stars, all investigations which are not ultimately reducible to simple visual observations are ... necessarily denied to us. While we can conceive of the possibility of determining their shapes, their sizes, and their motions, we shall never be able by any means to study their chemical composition or their mineralogical structure ... Our knowledge concerning their gaseous envelopes is necessarily limited to their existence, size ... and refractive power, we shall not at all be able to determine their chemical composition or even their density... I regard any notion concerning the true mean temperature of the various stars as forever denied to us. However, only 14 years later, the physicist Kirchhoff discovered that the chemical composition of a gas could be deduced from its electromagnetic spectrum viewed from an arbitrary distance. This method was extended to astronomical bodies by Huggins in 1864, who first used a spectrograph attached to a telescope. Not only have we learned how to determine the chemical composition of the stars and nebulae, but the element helium (the second most abundant in the universe) was first identified in the spectrum of the Sun, rather than in an earthbound laboratory. Today we use spectroscopy to measure chemical abundances, temperatures, velocities, rotations, ionization states, magnetic fields, pressure, turbulence, density, and many other properties of distant planets, stars, and galaxies. Some objects studied this way are over 10 billion light years away. Spectroscopy is the richest source of information about the universe. In its laboratory setting, spectroscopy provided the experimental basis for quantum mechanics. Two lessons: nature usually outstrips the human imagination. And philosophers often get science wrong.

  2. “Perfect” Thermal/Planck Radiation”:

  3. Imperfect “Thermal/Planck/Blackbody Radiation”:

  4. Generating a Thermal Radiation Spectrum (“White Light”):

  5. Generating Emission “Spectral Lines”:

  6. Generating Absorption “Spectral Lines”:

  7. Absorption Spectral Lines of Our Sun  Solar Composition!

More Related