1 / 13

Resource Control in Access Networks

Resource Control in Access Networks. Bert Winkelman, Sven Ooghe, Fred Willems September 2008. Agenda. Introduction The impact of QoS on quality of end-user services Why resource control Resource control Architecture – ITU and ETSI Proposed RAC architecture RAC in the first mile

Download Presentation

Resource Control in Access Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Resource Control in Access Networks Bert Winkelman, Sven Ooghe, Fred Willems September 2008

  2. Agenda • Introduction • The impact of QoS on quality of end-user services • Why resource control • Resource control • Architecture – ITU and ETSI • Proposed RAC architecture • RAC in the first mile • Resource request flow in proposed design • Conclusion

  3. Connection types and Service types - Diversity of Requirements

  4. The impact of QoS on quality of end-user services - Test Configuration

  5. The impact of QoS on quality of end-user services – Test Results

  6. Why resource control? • Bandwidth limitations in first mile, aggregation and core network • Protect quality of established sessions that require QoS treatment • Condition for a satisfactory customer experience for high-bandwidth services on first mile in lower bandwidth bracket ( 5, 10, 20 Mbit/s).

  7. Resource Admission Control – ITU and ETSI architecture

  8. Proposed RAC architecture

  9. RAC Function in the Access Network Connection types to be supported: • Unicast between access node and service node • Multicast between access node and service node • Unicast – Client interacts with Server • Multicast – Client interacts with Access node using IGMP

  10. RAC architecture in the first mile • Central: • Every client must support interaction with RACF • No standards available for session signalling Central or Local? • Local in Access Node: • Access node performs RAC for unicast and multicast connections • Central RAC passes unicast connection requests to Access node through interface with central RAC • No impact on client

  11. Resource Request Flow with Local RAC in the first mile (unicast service)

  12. Conclusion • Resource control is necessary to protect established sessions against service quality degradation • Local RAC in the access node is the recommended solution because: • It is a logical extension of the IGMP based multicast admission control function used in access node today, • Channel zapping delay does not increase, • No impact on customer premises equipment (set-top box, IP phone)

  13. www.alcatel-lucent.com www.alcatel-lucent.com

More Related