1 / 54

CBNRM in coastal Bulgaria: Advise on use and networking

CBNRM in coastal Bulgaria: Advise on use and networking. BSNN, Natura 2000 project on CZM Varna, Bulgaria, 2 July 2010 Lars T. Soeftestad Community-Based Natural Resource Management Network, (CBNRM Net, www.cbnrm.net). CONTENT . About yourself Aims with the session Presentation

berget
Download Presentation

CBNRM in coastal Bulgaria: Advise on use and networking

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CBNRM in coastal Bulgaria:Advise on use and networking BSNN, Natura 2000 project on CZM Varna, Bulgaria, 2 July 2010 Lars T. Soeftestad Community-Based Natural Resource Management Network, (CBNRM Net, www.cbnrm.net)

  2. CONTENT • About yourself • Aims with the session • Presentation • 3.1 Key terms • 3.2 About CBNRM • 3.3 Stakeholder analysis • 3.4 Networking and networks • Discussion • Evaluation Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  3. 1 ABOUT YOURSELF • In which sector do you work – public sector, civil society or private sector? • At which level do you work – local, regional and/or national? • What are your expectations with this session? • Have you participated in similar trainings earlier? Which topic? Org. by whom? • Was it useful? What did you like & what not? Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  4. About yourself, II • List informal and formal relationshiops you ahve with organizations represented here, and with persons that participate in the session • List relevant projects and activities Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  5. 2 AIMS WITH THE SESSION • Support the project • Present concepts, methods of analysis and ways of working • Contribute to awareness raising and empowerment of project stakeholders • Contribute to ensuring that the processes and results achieved by the project continues after project closure Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  6. Aims with the session, II • Provide tools for evaluating the project • Support the integration of the coastal region further into wider contexts (Bulgaria, Eastern Europe, EU) Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  7. Aims with the session, III • Initiate and facilitate communicatioan between all stakeholders stakeholders that have interests in the coastal region, as located in public sector, civil society and private sector • Support collective action and local partnerships • Promote exchange of information and knowledge Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  8. 3.1 KEY TERMS • Participation • Informal and formal participation in the democratic process • Is more participation needed ? • Governance • Based on participation • The idea that people are involved, through a democratic process, in governing themselves • Characterize roles and positions in your own village and municipality Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  9. Key terms, II • Stakeholders • Persons have different roles and positions in communities and municipalities, etc. • This means they have different interests (or stakes) in policy- and decision-making • Co-management • Association or collaboration between stakeholders that are dissimilar in certain respects Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  10. 3.2 ABOUT CBNRM • CBNRM = Community-Based Natural Resource Management • Two parts to the term • Definition • CBNRM Net Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  11. 3.3 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS • What is a stakeholder? • Persons have different roles and positions in communities, municipalities, etc. • This means they have different interests (or stakes) in policy- and decision-making • So, we have: • Roles and positions • Interests (stakes) • Influence and power Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  12. On stakeholders, I • What characterizes stakeholders? • Values • Preferences • Means • Goals • Where do we find stakeholders? • Public sector (at several levels) • Civil society (at several levels • Private sector Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  13. On stakeholders, II Classification and types: • Outside Bulgaria / internationally • Financing • Fund and project administration • In Bulgaria • Public, civil society and private sectors • Adm. levels: from govt. to community / population • Recipient/user and resource provider • Critical/neutral and opportunistic • Relationship to local population and the state Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  14. On stakeholders, III Public sector Central government departments and agencies Universities, Foundations, Local govern-ments Public utilities, Regulated corporations Family enterprises, Partnerships, Private corpo-rations NGOs, Community- based organizations Cooperati-ves, Trade unions Private sector Civil society Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  15. On stakeholders, III • Role of public adm. & civil society? Lack of NGOs a problem for governance? • Is associating with others important? • Stakeholders outside the coastal region determine and impact your work as well as your values • Stakeholders have official and hidden agendas and goals Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  16. Stakeholder models, I From simple to complex: • Line – 2 stakeholders • Donor and recipient, nation level • To be understood horizontally and vertically • Triangle – 3 stakeholders • Local population added • To be understood horizontally and vertically Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  17. Stakeholder models, II From simple to complex: • Square – 4 stakeholders • Civil society in countries outside Slovenia added • More stakeholders means more relationships • Stakeholders have to relate to increasing numbers of other stakeholders Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  18. Stakeholder models, III From simple to complex: • Pentagon and further ... • ”Everybody” are (key) stakeholders: self-identification • Different types of rationality Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  19. Stakeholder analysis, I • Originally prepared by the World Bank • A method to describe and analyse relationships between stakeholders • Important for analysing and understanding interests, including conflicts and conflict resolution Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  20. Stakeholder analysis, II • In connection with planning of projects • In connection with implementation and evaluation of projects • Used also at the sector level • Used in combination with other methods, incl. social assessment and social analysis Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  21. Stakeholder analysis, III Stakeholder analysis consists of 4 steps: • Identify key stakeholders • Assess their interests and the potential impact of the project on these interests • Assess their influence and importance • Outline stakeholder participation strategy Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  22. Stakeholder analysis, IV Stakeholder analysis, Step 1: Identify key stakeholders • Who are potential beneficiaries? • Who might be adversely affected? • Have vulnerable groups been identified? • Have supporters and opponents been identified? • What are the rel.ships among the stakeholders? Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  23. Stakeholder analysis, V Stakeholder analysis, Step 2: Assess interests and the potential impact of the project on these interests • What are their expectations of the project? • What benefits are there likely to be? • What resources might they mobilize? • What stakeholder interests conflict with project goals? Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  24. Stakeholder analysis, VI Stakeholder analysis, Step 3: Assess influence and importance (for each stakeholder assess the following): • Power & status (political, social, economic) • Degree of organization • Control of strategic resources • Informal influence (e.g., pers. connections) • Power relations with other stakeholders • Importance to the success of the project Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  25. Stakeholder analysis, VII Stakeholder analysis, Step 4: Outline stakeholder participation strategy. Plan stakeholder involvement acc. to: • Interests, importance and influence of each stakeholder • Particular efforts needed to involve important stakeholders who lack influence • Appropriate forms of participation throughout the project cycle Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  26. Stakeholder analysis, VIII Institutional analysis – at the micro- and macro-levels • Institutions or organizations are a special type of stakeholder that often requires separate analysis • Institutions facilitates and constrains the flow of knowledge and data between scales • Important for understanding and assessing power and empowerment Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  27. 3.4 NETWORKING AND NETWORKS • A network is a social structure of persons that are connected by various types of interdependency • Members of a network are often involved in collective action • A network’s structure can be presented visually (see next slide) Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  28. Introduction, II • Collective action • Two or more stakeholders collaborating to reach a joint goal or goals • Basis for participation and governance • Networks • Why associate more formally with each other? • What is the connection between coastal zone management, sustainable development, transparency, governance, democratization and networking? Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  29. On networks, I A simple network consists of nodes and links • Stakeholders / Nodes: • Peripheral vs. central • Power vs. lack of power • Relations / Links: • Strength • Direction • Content Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  30. On networks, II • Role of a network • Integrate members (i.e., stakeholders) • Disseminate and share information • Table and discuss common issues • Address, mediate and solve conflicts • Build trust • Networks compared • With trad. social org. (in Eastern Europe in general and Bulgaria in particular) Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  31. On networks, III • Advantages of networks • General: inclusion, governance, participation, transparency • Specific: sustainable coastal zone management can only be reach through collaboration, necessary to think in terms of the coastal region • Network versus partnership • Partnerships: few members, targeted, formal Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  32. On networks, IV • Case: Bulgaria’s near past • Negative aspects of a hierarchical societal structure • Individuals affiliated with public institutions often do not contribute, for specific reasons. What are some examples of this? Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  33. Issues in networking, I • Conflicts and conflict management • Why do conflicts arise? • Who are key stakeholders in the coastal region? • What are their views? • How do latent conflicts become real? • Conflicts are normal • What are your experiences with conflicts? Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  34. Issues in networking, II • Trust • What is trust? • Absence of trust often leads to conflict • How to build trust • Participants to presnet own experiences • The harmony model (see following 5 slides) Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  35. Issues in networking, III Harmony model, no. 1 Support Support Increase democracy org. civil society & economic dev. • Building organizations = building societies • Supporting civil society is positive in itself, anytime and anywhere Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  36. Issues in networking, IV Harmony model, no. 2 • Lacking understanding of conflicts and differences of interest • Development is a transformation: new interests win and older ones disappear • Strong organizations for new interests can support development, and vice versa Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  37. Issues in networking, V Harmony model, no. 3 • Country cooperation: strong external force • Interfer in social, political and ec. processes • Civil society: there will be growth in organizations with varying legitimation • Local stakeholders receive resources, which in turn may impact the balance between groups and interests Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  38. Issues in networking, VI Harmony model, no. 4 • Understand the social contract as a colla-borative (co-mgmt.) enterprise between stakeholders with different expertise and comparative advantages • Get civil society to contribute to political and ec. development that benefit the people Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  39. Issues in networking, VII Harmony model, no. 5 • Strong organizations that are not integra-ted into society contribute to segmen ta-tion, opposition and conflicts that hamper development • Modernization: develop political and administrative institutions that can handle conflicts and overcome obstacles Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  40. Examples of networks • Bulgaria • Black Sea NGO Network • Romania and Eastern Europe • ProSomes (Bistrita Municipal Network) • Carpathian Network of Protected Areas • International • Community-Based Natural Resource Management Network (CBNRM Net) Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  41. Co-management, I • Co-management • Association or collaboration between stakeholders that are dissimilar in various respects • Mostly found between stakeholders at the local level (villages and municipalities) and the national level. That is, these stakeholders are located along a vertical axis. • Co-management has important advantages in terms of comparative advantages and sharing of responsibilities Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  42. Co-management, II Co-management relations between key stakeholders – The past Central govt. Community-based groups Local govt. People Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  43. Co-management, III Co-management relationships between key stakeholders – Future / Goal: Community-based groups Co-management Central govt. Local govt. Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  44. The Bulgaria coastal network, I • Underlying principles • Equity and equality • Public participation • Transparency • Governance • Structure • Hierarchy versus horizontality • Roles: office holders and members Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  45. The Bulgaria coastal network, II • Levels of involvement: Roles & passive versus active • Process of decision-making & expressing opinions • Members and membership • Lacking role of civil society • Eligible members: public sector and private sector Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  46. The Bulgaria coastal network, III • Organizing networks • Appropriate approaches for creating network • Role of an external agent • Pro et contra: what are your views? • Broadening the perspective • Partnerships (internal) & co-mgmt. (external) • Past, ongoing and planned projects • Criteria for collaboration? Can network help? Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  47. Conclusions, I • Projects are increasingly process oriented • Project admin. is hierarchic (communication) • Relate not only to local stakeholders but also to colleagues and partners (cf. network analysis) • Often difficult balancing act: compromises • One learns as one go along Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  48. Conclusions, II • Stakeholder analysis important to under-stand what is happening at the local level • Increase effect and goal attainment • Decrease negative impacts • Decrease in negative effect is little under-stood and even less focused on • Key stakeholders do not understand project cooperation and impacts • Key stakeholders have different agendas • Lead to conflicts, which must be addressed Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  49. Challenges, I • Get civil society to contribute to political and ec. dev. that benefits the people • Strong org. that are not integrated in society contribute to segmentation, opposition and conflicts that hamper dev. • Modernisation: develop political and adm. institutions that can handle conflicts and overcome obstacles Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

  50. Challenges, II • Cooperation between public sector, private sector and civil society crucial • Concern: strong outside intervention coupled with weak local basis for own autonomy • Inability of public sector to support people via civil society organized activities Natura 2000: CZM, 2 Jul 2010

More Related