1 / 23

Flight Times to Anchorage

Flight Times to Anchorage. North America Seattle 3 hours Salt Lake City 5 San Francisco 4.5 Los Angeles 5 Chicago 5.5 New York City 8 International London 7 Zurich 9.5 Tokyo 6.5 Seoul 8.5. Anchorage Physical Data.

bernad
Download Presentation

Flight Times to Anchorage

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Flight Times to Anchorage North America Seattle 3 hours Salt Lake City 5 San Francisco 4.5 Los Angeles 5 Chicago 5.5 New York City 8 International London 7 Zurich 9.5 Tokyo 6.5 Seoul 8.5

  2. Anchorage Physical Data International Airport 61.07 deg. N, 150.02 deg. W 40 meters (131 ft.) above msl Typical May 11-15 Conditions Daylight 17 hours 18 minutes Temperature range 4 - 13 deg. C (39 - 55F) Precipitation (month) 1.7 cm. (0.7 in.) Snow depth Zero

  3. ICC 2003 CONFERENCE COMMITTEE

  4. Technical Program Framework • May 11 & 15 • Tutorials (4 parallel sessions/day or 4-8 tutorials/day depending on number of whole- and half-day tutorials) • Workshops (2, half-day) • May 12-14 • 16 tracks/day, 4 sessions/day (General Conference, Symposia, PBAS) • Plenary Sessions part of General Conference/Symposia/PBAS

  5. SYMPOSIA – 1 Optical Networking Chairs: • Mounir Hamdi, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, hamdi@cs.ust.hk • Chunming Qiao, State University of New York Buffalo, qiao@ieee.org • Mohsen Guizani,University of West Florida mguizani@cs.uwf.edu

  6. SYMPOSIA – 2 The Next Generation Internet Chairs: • Mario Gerla, University of California Los Angeles, gerla@cs.ucla.edu • Marjory Johnson NASA Ames Research Center, mjj@riacs.edu • Horst Besier, T Systems, Germany, horst.besier@t-systems.de

  7. SYMPOSIA – 3 Broadband Wireless & Satellite Communication Systems Chairs: • Tony Ephremides, University of Maryland, tony@glue.umd.edu • Zoran Kostic, AT&T Research, zoran.kostic@att.com • Satchandi Verma, TRW, satchandi.verma@trw.com

  8. SYMPOSIA – 4 Communication Theory Chairs: • Steve McLaughlin, Georgia Tech University, swm@ee.gatech.edu • Urbashi Mitra, University of Southern California, urbi@usc.edu

  9. SYMPOSIA – 5 Personal Communications and Wireless LANS Chairs: • Chatschik Bisdikian, IBM Watson Research Center, bisdik@watson,ibm.com • Sajal Das, University of Texas Arlington, das@root.uta.edu

  10. SYMPOSIA – 6 Advanced DSP for Multimedia Chairs: • Jaafaar Elmirghani, University of Wales, Swansea, UK, j.m.h.elmirghani@swan.ac.uk • Yucel Altunbasak, Georgia Institute of Technology, yucel@ee.gatech.edu

  11. SYMPOSIA – 7 Communication QoS, Reliability, and Performance Modeling Chairs: • Koichi Asatani, Kogakuin University, Japan, asatani@cc.kogakuin.ac.jp • K.S. Kuo, National Chengchi University, Taiwan, gskuo@mail.com • Nelson Fonseca, State University of Campinas, Brazil, nfonseca@ic.unicamp.br

  12. SYMPOSIA – 8 Global Services and Infrastructure for NG Networks Chairs: • Seshadri Mohan, Comverse, seshadri.mohan@comverse.com • Fawzi Daoud, GMD, daoud@gmd.de • Heinrich Stuttgen, NEC, stuttgen@ccrl.nec.de

  13. TUTORIALS Physical Layer Communication Chair: • John Barry, Georgia Tech University, barry@ee.gatech.edu Networking Layers Chair: • Catherine Rosenberg, Purdue University cath@ecn.purdue.edu

  14. PANELS AND BUSINESS APPLICATION SESSIONS Chairs: • Mehmet Ulema, Manhattan College, m.ulema@ieee.org Panels Chairs: • Edwin Chong, Colorado State University, echong@engr.colostate.edu • Feng-Wen Sun, Hughes Network Systems, fsun@hns.com

  15. Technical Program Matrix

  16. Technical Program Committee (TPC) • Consist of about 200 experts in different areas of communications • Handle ICC’03 submissions (coordinate review process) • Organize and chair sessions

  17. Workload for TPC Members • Number of submissions: 1200 – 2000 (1600 for Globecom’02) • Number of papers for each TPC member: 10 -15

  18. Paper Submission Authors must • chose • general conference, and • one of 8 symposia, • specify their priorities. Examples: • 1st priority: Symposia 6, 2nd priority: General conference  acceptable • 1st priority: General conference, 2nd priority: Symposia 2  acceptable • 1st priority: Symposia 7, 2nd priority: Symposia 2  not acceptable • 1st priority: General conference, 2nd priority: General conference  not acceptable

  19. Paper Assignment to Symposia Chairs According to • author’s choice, • distribution of submissions. Example: Sessions in Symposia X need 45 paper Chairs of Sym. X need to handle 100 submissions (assuming 45% acceptance rate)  • 80 submissions with Sym. X as 1st priority and 40 submissions with Sym. X as 2nd priority  80 1st priority + 20 from 40 2nd priority to Sym. X • 120 submissions with Sym. X as 1st priority and 30 submissions with Sym. X as 2nd priority  100 from 1st priority to Sym. X

  20. Final Decisions on Papers • TPC of general conference or each symposia accepts top 1/3 papers and rejects bottom 1/3 papers. (The results should not be released to the authors yet) • All TPC members of general conference and 8 symposia discuss and shuffle the middle 1/3 papers, and make final decisions on those papers at Globecom’02 in Taiwan. • The decisions of all papers will be released to authors.

  21. Summary of Review Process • Everything is done electronically • Each paper should have at least 3 qualified reviews • Each TPC member determines top 1/3 (accepted) & bottom 1/3 (rejected) papers according to review results • TPC will discuss the middle 1/3 papers at Globecom’02 and make decisions according to the reviews.

  22. Rules for TPC Members • Rules of thumb for review process of ICC’03: • No TPC member handles his/her own or colleague’s paper(s). • TPC members should not contact authors directly regarding his/her paper review. • Contact technical program or symposia chairs immediately if you feel uncomfortable to handle some papers due to any reasons.

  23. Time Table for Paper Review • Deadline for paper submission: Aug. 1, 2002 • Papers assigned to different symposia: Sept. 1, 2002 • Papers assigned to different TPC members: Sept. 15, 2002 • Feedback from the TPC members for top 1/3 & bottom 1/3 papers: Oct. 27, 2002 • Final decisions (Globecom’02): Nov. 17, 2002

More Related