1 / 19

SHORT OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL TRAVEL SURVEYS

SHORT OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL TRAVEL SURVEYS. 1. Auteur ou Service. M.O. Gascon, CERTU, October 2006. COST meeting, Prague. 2 décembre 2002. TYPE OF SURVEY (EU25, EU candidates, EFTA, USA, South Corea). RESPONSE RATE. %. SLOVAK REPUBLIC. LATVIA. AVERAGE NUMBER OF TRIPS/PERSON/DAY. SWEDEN.

bianca-osborn
Download Presentation

SHORT OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL TRAVEL SURVEYS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SHORT OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL TRAVEL SURVEYS 1 Auteur ou Service M.O. Gascon, CERTU, October 2006 COST meeting, Prague 2 décembre 2002

  2. TYPE OF SURVEY(EU25, EU candidates, EFTA, USA, South Corea)

  3. RESPONSE RATE % SLOVAK REPUBLIC LATVIA

  4. AVERAGE NUMBER OF TRIPS/PERSON/DAY SWEDEN LATVIA

  5. AVERAGE TOTAL TRAVEL DISTANCE /PERSON/DAY (MIN) SWITZERLAND LATVIA

  6. SOME DIFFERENCES AND CONSEQUENCES IN NPTS AND LOCAL TRANSPORT SURVEYS 6 Auteur ou Service M.O. Gascon, CERTU, October 2006 COST meeting, Prague 2 décembre 2002

  7. Sample size (for global figures) Source : survey / census Households or persons (cluster effect / two stages sampling) DIFFERENCES ON SAMPLING PROCEDURES

  8. Age: mini 6,10 (15) / no max,74/84 Mobility for a single (previous) day or a week Long distance trips : 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months DIFFERENCES ON SAMPLING PROCEDURES

  9. Working day ? All days ? Continuous ? Cross sectional ? Face to face ? Telephone ? Postal ? DIFFERENCES ON SAMPLING PROCEDURES

  10. Long distance trip = >50 km (D), >200 km (B), >80 km (F) Walking trips : all, limit on distance (45 m, UK) on duration (5’, Italy) DIFFERENCES IN DEFINITIONS 10

  11. Mode : several ? Main mode ? (longest part of the trip,hierarchy) Trip purposes : not the same classification (3 to 13 !) DIFFERENCES IN DEFINITIONS

  12. Additional information on certain kinds of trips : tourism, taxi drivers, rounds (postmen, doctors) Vehicle-kilometers / passenger-kilometers DIFFERENCES IN DEFINITIONS 12

  13. Publications do not allow full comparison Modes : car (driver/passenger), motorbike/bicycle, taxis, motorised/non motorised, public/private, rail, urban/interurban DIFFERENCES IN INDICATORS

  14. Purposes : work/education, shopping/personal business, escort, leisure (sport/culture/visit to friends and relatives), home Distance, travel time, age : different classifications DIFFERENCES IN INDICATORS

  15. ALMOST 100 SURVEYS ON 80 URBAN AREAS, 20 IN PROJECT BEFORE 2009 FACE TO FACE IN THE MORE DENSE ZONE PHONE IN THE OUTSKIRTS FRENCH LOCAL TRAVEL SURVEYS

  16. (more urbanised zone) Bias in the sample : Land line phone equipement is decreasing : urban area of Grenoble 2002 : 86% Students : only ½, they live in the more urbanised zone WHY NOT BY PHONE IN LOCAL TRANSPORT SURVEY 16

  17. (more urbanised zone) Daily mobility different(Grenoble) no land line phone : 4,4 trips/pers/day, with land line phone : 4,0 more by PT (+ 0,3), more on foot (+ 0,3) and less by car (- 0,2) WHY NOT BY PHONE IN LOCAL TRANSPORT SURVEY 17

  18. No land line phone : 7% Daily mobility less different : 3,6 , with land line phone : 3,7 Less trips out of the municipality of home : no land line phone : 1/2, with land line phone : 2/3 WHY BY PHONE IN THE OUTSKIRTS ? 18

  19. Slight difference on global daily mobility figure if surveying only equipped households : 3,77 trips/pers/day instead of 3,72 WHY BY PHONE IN THE OUTSKIRTS ? 19

More Related