100 likes | 113 Views
Demand side perspective on JI. UNFCCC Side event on Joint Implementation Gertraud Wollansky Federal Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management. Importance of Joint Implementation.
E N D
Demand side perspective on JI UNFCCC Side event on Joint Implementation Gertraud Wollansky Federal Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management
Importance of Joint Implementation • Many Annex II countries have established or are planning to establish acquisition programmes for ERUs and CERs (NL, Canada, Austria, Denmark, …) • EU ETS and Linking directive give a new impulse to the market, demand will increase from private sector • Estimates exist for overall demand for project based credits, but difficult to split into JI and CDM demand
Comparative advantages of JI versus CDM • JI host countries established markets for many European companies • Daughter companies in JI countries provide opportunity for emission reductions • Perceived by some companies as less risky than CDM • Track 1 less complicated than CDM, if requirements are met
Comparative disadvantages of JI versus CDM • Double counting provision in Linking directive limits use of JI by EU countries in new EU members • Some – not all – new MS have held up approval of JI projects • Risk of eliminating JI in EU MS by establishing very restrictive double counting rules? • Market prices for ERUs have tended to be higher than for CERs in the past
How to compensate disadvantages • Simplify JI by using Track 1 – still uncertain course for some host countries • Give certainty about Track 2 – not restrict investments to Track 1 countries! • Establishment of Green Investment Schemes • Procedures probably very like Track 1 • Avoids obstacles to JI posed by Linking directive • Allows a coordinated approach and more control for host party over project portfolio
Expectations (1) What Parties and PPs expect from COP/moP1: • Confirmation of the assumptions used for projects already started (baseline and monitoring methodologies, DOEs-IEs, ….) • Security for the investments by providing the legal framework – this means adoption of JI decision • Guidance how to use the framework developed under CDM
Expectations (2) • Experiences from CDM that can and should be used for JI, i.a.: • Approved methodologies for baselines and monitoring • Provisions for small scale • Accredited DOEs as IEs • Accreditation procedures for IEs • Rules of procedure for SC as applicable • Use of Panels, Working groups
Expectations (3) • Open questions: • Further linkeages between JI and CDM concerning methodologies, accreditation, …. • SC and EB are independent bodies, can make their own decisions • Independent development of JI, even if using experiences from CDM • But: SC and EB should keep close contact and take account of developments in the other bodies
Expectations (4) • Funding issue has to be solved, not concentrate only on CDM and ITL funding • Adequate resources for Secretariat important • JI SC can build on work already done, but has to adapt it to its own needs • SC should develop a work plan for the first year based on guidance by COP/moP to set up modalities for JI implementation
Thank you for your attention! • Contact information: gertraud.wollansky@lebensministerium.at