1 / 20

What Is Just Cause?

What Is Just Cause?. Philosophy of industrial justice Combines two basic concepts: Due process Progressive discipline Is there a difference between “cause,” “just cause” & “good cause”?. Typical Progressive Discipline Steps.

borna
Download Presentation

What Is Just Cause?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What Is Just Cause? • Philosophy of industrial justice • Combines two basic concepts: • Due process • Progressive discipline • Is there a difference between “cause,” “just cause” & “good cause”?

  2. Typical Progressive Discipline Steps • Coaching & counseling (contract or policy may treat as non-disciplinary step) • Verbal warning • Written warning • Suspension without pay • Demotion • Decision-making leave • Termination

  3. Just Cause Checklist • Rule No. 1: Did the employee violate a known reasonable rule or order? • Rule No. 2: Did the employee receive an adequate opportunity to correct his/her behavior through the use of progressive discipline? • Rule No. 3: Was the employee treated consistently with other similarly situated employees? • Rule No. 4: Was the employer at fault either in whole or in part?

  4. Just Cause Checklist(cont.) • Rule No. 5: Did the employer conduct a full and fair investigation? • Rule No. 6: Did the employee receive the benefit of all procedural protections? • Rule No. 7: Did the punishment fit the crime? • Rule No. 8: Were there any relevant mitigating circumstances? • Rule No. 9: What was the previous record of the employee?

  5. Violation of Known Rule or Order • Expectation-setting piece of just cause • “Work now, grieve later” • Was the rule reasonably related to the agency’s business? • Was it sensible? • Was it communicated, and if so, how? • Was it based on workplace common sense? • How to prove employee “knew” the rule?

  6. Progressive Discipline • What was the prior level of discipline? • Was the prior discipline for a related issue? • How long has passed since the last discipline? • Is the conduct so serious that prior discipline is not necessary?

  7. Comparison to Others • Have there been prior incidents of similar misconduct? • What infractions have resulted in similar penalties? • What is justification for difference in treatment? • Employee work record • Rule changes • Change in supervision

  8. Fault of the Employer • Did a supervisor participate in or provoke the misconduct (e.g., insubordination)? • Was the employee adequately trained?

  9. Investigations • Did the employer conduct a full and fair investigation? • Thoroughness is a function of circumstances • Did the employer solicit and consider the employee’s version of events?

  10. Discipline Investigation Issues • Objective and thorough • Notes vs. tape recorder (consent issues) • Union reps at interviews (Weingarten) • Interviews regarding possible criminal activity (Garrity)

  11. Weingarten Issues • General right to union representative in investigatory interviews where employee reasonably fears discipline • Applies only to investigatory interviews • Applies only to unionized employees • Doesn’t apply to fact witnesses • Employee obligation to ask for representative • Union representative’s appropriate role

  12. Garrity Rights • Applies when employee faces both criminal prosecution and internal discipline • Harmonizes employer’s right to question employee with employee’s right to protection from self-incrimination • Employer must give assurances that employee’s answers will not be used in any criminal proceeding

  13. Investigation Documentation • Paint picture with words • Thoroughly proof • Avoid speculation about motivation • Don’t rely on employee-prepared statements alone

  14. Discipline Notice Framework • Introduction • Specify agency’s relevant rules • Apply factual conclusions to rules • Statement of importance • Future consequences

  15. Procedural Protections • Were all legal and constitutional protections observed? • Did the agency comply with process promised in contract, handbooks and policies (e.g., Police Officer Bill of Rights)? • Due process implications (e.g., Loudermill)

  16. Loudermill Hearings • When are they required • Employees with property interest in job + employer action with financial impact • Employees facing 1) termination for stigmatizing reason or 2) termination of ability to pursue chosen profession (i.e., paramedic reassigned to firefighter) • What documentation to use • How formal are the hearings • Loudermill hearing vs. investigatory interview • Name-clearing hearings

  17. Did the Punishment Fit the Crime • Does contract or policy dictate level of discipline? • Examples of “Cardinal Sins”

  18. Mitigating Circumstances • Has the employee acknowledged fault? • Did the employee take some action to correct problem? • Did the employee lie during the investigation?

  19. Prior Work Record • What is the quality of the employee’s work record? • Are there limits on relevant material?

  20. Particularly Difficult Discipline Situations • Insubordination • Direct order + consequence for refusal • Employee disrespect to supervisor • Officer’s lying • Off-duty misconduct

More Related