740 likes | 1.74k Views
Current Si tuation of Post-harvest technology in Myanmar. Presented By. Myanmar Participants. Profile of Myanmar. Neighbor to China, India, Laos, Bangladesh, Thailand 9 ° 32’ to 28°31’ Latitude 92 ° 10’ to 101 ° 11’ Longitude Area : 676,577 km 2
E N D
Current Situation of Post-harvest technology in Myanmar Presented By Myanmar Participants
Profile of Myanmar • Neighbor to China, India, Laos, Bangladesh, Thailand • 9°32’ to 28°31’ Latitude • 92°10’ to 101°11’ Longitude • Area : 676,577 km2 • Extended about 2361 km from north to south • About 1078 km from east to west • A very long costal line of about 2234 km • Population over 59.13 million
Profile of Myanmar cont. • Climate - rainy, dry cold, summer/ hot season • Rainfall • Costal and hilly region - 2600 – 5280 mm • Central Myanmar - 750 – 925 mm • Upper Myanmar - 1080 – 2290 mm • Temperature • Central plain • cold season – 10 – 15°C • hot season - 40°C • Hilly region • Average maximum temperature - 29°C • Average minimum temperature - 7°C • Water resource - total annual flow - 836.73 million ac ft
Profile of Myanmar cont. Land utilization in 2009-2010 Sources – Agriculture Brief
Cereal crop production in Myanmar (2009-2010) Sources – MAS, 2010
Oil seed crop production in Myanmar Sources – MAS, 2010
Pea & bean production area in Myanmar-2 Sources – MAS, 2010
Vegetable production in Myanmar 2009-2010 Sources – MAS, 2010
Fruit production in Myanmar 2009-2010 -2 Sources – MAS, 2010
Culinary crop production in Myanmar Sources – MAS, 2010
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Myanmar • Agriculture - vital part of Myanma economy • 12.14 % of total export earning • 61 % of labor force • 35.63 % of total GDP Sources – MOAI, 2010
Data on export of agricultural products (ton) Sources – Ministry of commerce
Data on export of major fruits and culinary crop (ton) Sources – Ministry of commerce
Situation of post harvest technology in Myanmar • Post harvest handling- the movement of commodities and • operations undergo from harvest • to meal • The estimated magnitude of postharvest loss in Myanmar • fresh produce - about 25-40% • rice - about 5- 20 % • peas and beans- 5-7%
Estimated Levels of postharvest losses in the Asia Pacific Region R.S. Rolle, Agr.Industries Officer, FAO, 2004
Postharvest losses of Fruits and Vegetable in Myanmar • Harvesting losses • Transportation losses • Storage losses • Handling losses • Total losses of fruits and vegetable – 25-40 % Wholesale Dealers Site (10-19%) Producers Site (11-12%) Retail Sellers Site 4- 8 %
by boat . Transportation harvested crops from field to main road by minitrailor. by bullock-cart Ox cart
Paper bag for good quality mango Paper bags provided by FAO Locally available Paper bags made by the farmers
Rice postharvest losses in Myanmar • Harvesting losses • Transportation losses (to drying area ) • Drying on dike losses • Threshing losses • Storage Losses • Total losses of Rice – 5.6% - 20.9%
Rice Postharvest losses in Myanmar Tin Ohmmar Win and Hla Gyi. 2011
Bundles Left in the Field for Drying Farmers left rice bundles in the field for 10-30 days. It is one of the most injurious phase of rice quality for millers with erratic climate condition
Traditional Storage Conventional Storage
Postharvest Losses in leguminous crops in Myanmar • Harvesting losses • Drying losses • Threshing and Winnowing losses • Transportation losses • Storage Losses • Total losses of leguminous crops – 4.6% -6.6 % Ref* Dr TOMW Postharvest
Postharvest Losses (%) of Legumes Tin Ohmmar Win and Than Kyaing. 2010
Constraints in post-harvest technology application in Myanmar • Poor infrastructure andlogistic • Few private enterprises to investment in agriculture sector • Higher cost for improved storage system • Not enough Research works
Constraints in post-harvest technology application in Myanmar • Growers and stakeholder are unawareness of postharvest • technology • Public extension system to growers is rather weak • Limited numbers of post- harvest crop management technicians
Conclusion • Reduction of post-harvest losses is one of the best ways to attain food security and increase the economy. • Simple and reliable post harvest technologies obtained from this training can be applied to improve post harvest technology to growers in our country.