1 / 35

Ricardian Model

Ricardian Model. INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, ECO 486 JDE notes to supplement the text. David Ricardo April 18, 1772 — September 11, 1823 . Learning Objectives. Understand five more assumptions Determine and understand comparative and absolute advantage Find international trade equilibrium

brenna
Download Presentation

Ricardian Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ricardian Model • INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS,ECO 486 • JDE notes to supplement the text. David Ricardo April 18, 1772 — September 11, 1823

  2. Learning Objectives • Understand five more assumptions • Determine and understand comparative and absolute advantage • Find international trade equilibrium • Explain gains from trade • Derive range of wages that will permit trade

  3. Assumptions • #8 -- Factors of production cannot move between countries • #9 -- There are no barriers to trade in goods.

  4. Assumptions #10 • #10 -- Exports must pay for imports • Assumptions 8-10 apply to both the Classical and HO Models • Assumptions 11 & 12 apply only to Classical Model

  5. Assumptions • #11 -- Labor is the only relevant factor of production in terms of productivity analysis or costs of production. • #12 -- Production exhibits constant returns to scale, CRS,between labor and output. • If both inputs, K & L, are doubled, output doubles • Implies Linear PPF and complete specialization

  6. Ricardian Theorem • A country exports that good which has higher comparative factor productivity and imports the commodity which has lower comparative factor productivity than the other country. • Page 48, Ravendra N. Batra, Studies in the Pure Theory of International Trade

  7. Differing technologies and resource endowments

  8. Differing Opportunity Costs

  9. Production possibility frontiers: (a) country A; (b) country B.

  10. Autarky • Given perfect competition, • P = MC • Autarky price of S (on x-axis) equals slope of PPF • Resource payments correspond to their productivity

  11. Pretrade equilibriums: (a) country A; (b) country B.

  12. Absolute Advantage • Compare one good across countries. • Country with greater output per labor hour has an absolute advantage in that good.

  13. Comparative Advantage • Calculate opportunity costs. • Compare one good across countries. • Country with lower opportunity cost has a comparative advantage in that good.

  14. Which Advantage? • Absolute advantage is a special case. • Comparative advantage is the general case.

  15. Terms of Trade • Once trade begins, an international equilibrium results • Results in one world price for a good

  16. International Trade Equilibrium • Complete specialization in Comparative Advantage good • CIC & ToT tangent at consumption point • Congruent trade triangles imply balanced trade

  17. Posttrade equilibriums: (a) country A; (b) country B.

  18. Gains From Trade • More of both goods attainable • GDP increases at pre-trade prices • Higher CIC is attainable

  19. The gains from trade (country A).

  20. Country A’s trading equilibrium.

  21. Exchange Rates • State exchange rate, E, in US dollars per UK pound • say $2/£ • A good will be imported if its foreign pre-trade price (x E) is less than the domestic price • PS < E x PS*

  22. Buy Low . . . • Trade requires • PS < E x PS* • PT > E x PT* • autarky prices • Home (A) has comparative advantage in S • Foreign (B) has comparative advantage in T

  23. Perfect Competition Review(Product & Resource Markets) • PX = MC for a good, X • MC = w/MPPL (Labor, L, is only var. input) • w=MRPL =(MR) MPPL=(P) MPPL=VMPL

  24. Prices & Wages • PX = MC = w/MPPL • MPPL is measured as units of X per hour, OLX • Productivity may be stated as hours per unit of X, aLX, or units of X per hour worked, OLX. aLX = 1/OLX • PX = w /OLX

  25. Trade & Wages (Cont.)

  26. Competitive Advantage • The ability to sell a good at the lowest price. • Usually results from comparative advantage • Alternatively, it may be the result of . . . • Government subsidies for inefficient industries • An undervalued exchange rate

  27. Losing Competitive Advantage • If Home’s relative wage ratio (W/W*) exceeds its relative productivity (OLS/OLS*), its S will cost _______ than Foreign’s. • If a country’s currency is overvalued (say $1/£ instead of $2/£), comparative advantage may be lost -- both goods may be cheaper in ___________.

  28. Country A’s price-consumption curve.

  29. Derivation of country A’s offer curve.

  30. International trade equilibrium.

  31. Cambodian Textiles Update • US offered to expand Cambodia’s export quota by 14% if “working conditions is the Cambodia textile and apparel sector substantially comply with” local and internationally recognized core standards. • Dec ’99 – US officials decide that Cambodia has fallen short, but offered 5% • Cambodia to establish independent monitoring with the International Labor Organization, ILO

  32. Cambodian Textiles Update • ILO leery, fearing weakening of local monitoring capability • ILO agrees after US pledges $500,000 in technical assistance to Cambodian labor ministry • US also paying $1 million (of $1.4 mil.) for a 3-year monitoring effort • USTR press release 18 May 2000

  33. Cambodian Textiles Update • Sep ’00 – US officials grant Cambodia another 4% increase • 9% increase continued for ’01 • Other news: • Nov ’00 -- ILO rules Burma’s progress on forced labor inadequate. Section 33 action authorized. As of March ’01, no member country has taken action. US & EU considering sanctions • Bush proposed reducing US contributions to the ILO budget.

  34. Quantity of Soybeans Demanded PS/PT = 2.5 yd.T/bu.S 10 H Autarky General Equilibrium|slope PPF| = PS/PT =2 yd.T/bu.S 8 G TEXTILES, T (millions of yards per year) 6 L PS/PT = 1 yd.T/bu.S 4 CIC2 2 CIC1 CIC0 PPF 1.8 0 2 4 6 8 10 4.7 SOYBEANS, S (millions of bushels per year)

  35. Tony Auth, NY Times editorial cartoon, December 2, 1999

More Related