1 / 14

TB & Simulation results

TB & Simulation results. Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos. 2. Atlas simulation and reconstruction tools have been used to simulate the TB tracking study with helix fit done last August. Introduction. Simulation results Inner detector SCT system Simulation of Beam Test configuration Setup

brilliant
Download Presentation

TB & Simulation results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia & M. Vos

  2. 2 Atlas simulation and reconstruction tools have been used to simulate the TB tracking study with helix fit done last August. Introduction • Simulation results • Inner detector • SCT system • Simulation of Beam Test configuration • Setup • Results comparison • Projects and plans for the future SCT Week – March 03 TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia

  3. 3 Software • Both DC1 and custom-generated Atlsim data have been used. • xKalman++ for the reconstruction. • Results are extracted from the combined ntuple (CBNT). • Muons of energies from 10 to 500 GeV. • More than 20K events for each energy, including runs with high statistics. SCT Week – March 03 TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia

  4. Inner TDR Inner New 4 TDR results • Left column shows variation with  as in the TDR. • Right column results with reconstruction software and data from DC1. • In both cases particles simulated are muons with a PT of 20 GeV. • Round markers should be comparable (similar field and conditions). SCT Week – March 03 TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia

  5. Inner TDR Inner New 5 TDR results (II) • All the plots show similar results with a slight deterioration in the forward part. • Some changes in software, layout and magnetic field could cause the difference. SCT Week – March 03 TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia

  6. 6 Simulatedstand-alone SCT system SCT results Resolution of 1/pT Resolution in  SCT Week – March 03 TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia

  7. 7 Simulatedstand-alone SCT system SCT results cont. Resolution of do Resolution of cot() SCT Week – March 03 TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia

  8. 8 SCT Results cont. PT dependence SCT Week – March 03 • Actual simulation agrees with TDR. • It is possible to simulate the behavior of the stand alone SCT. • Track parameter resolution with increasing PT becomes flat. • Efficiency is around 92% and the fake rate for single muons reconstruction is negligible. TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia

  9. 9 Setup SCT Week – March 03 TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia

  10. 10 Setup SCT Week – March 03 TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia

  11. 11 • To compare simulation and TB results 20K muons with PT = 500 GeV,   0 have been used. • This situation is similar to the TB due to the small curvature at this energies (xKalman++ is not able to disconnect the reconstruction from magnetic field). • Parameters of the helix fit from TB ATLAS. An example of distributions is shown below, TB results in red and simulation in white. Tracking system TB SCT Week – March 03 TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia

  12. Pixels + SCT Test Beam SCT 12 Tracking comparison • Looking closer peaks due to the binary readout can be seen in testbeam and simulation. Adding the pixels to the simulation the “peaks disappear”. SCT Week – March 03 TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia

  13. 13 Tracking comparison (II) • Resolutions for TB and simulation of the SCT are similar. • Slight deterioration for 1fC with respect to 1.2fC. • Precision Tracker resolution are given for comparison. SCT Week – March 03 TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia

  14. 14 • Beam test tracking is compatible with full simulation + reconstruction. • The same study with magnetic field is needed. • Different energies (PT) should be used. The dependence of the wrong sign fraction could be checked with the 100 GeV beam. For track parameters lower energies are needed. Conclusions • Effect of multiple scattering can be analyzed adding more material (cooling pipe,…) in the TB setup. • The same tools could be used with new data. SCT Week – March 03 TB & Simulation results Jose E. Garcia

More Related