1 / 17

hadrons

. e  e  annihilation and  physics. Michel Davier, Yuan Changzheng LAL-Orsay and IHEP-Beijing. IHEP. First France-China FCPPL Workshop January 15-18 , 200 8 , Marseille. . . . hadrons. davier@lal.in2p3.fr. Collaboration IHEP-LAL.

brygid
Download Presentation

hadrons

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ee annihilation and  physics Michel Davier, Yuan Changzheng LAL-Orsay and IHEP-Beijing IHEP First France-China FCPPL Workshop January 15-18, 2008, Marseille    hadrons davier@lal.in2p3.fr

  2. Collaboration IHEP-LAL • a 20-year old tradition: agreement signed by Ye Minghan and MD • in 1988 for collaborating in particle and accelerator physics • many exchanges over the years: students, postdocs, engineers • several visitors at LAL have now key positions in China • present collaboration within FCPPL built over this foundation • big contribution of Chinese physicists at LAL to ALEPH  physics • Zhang Zhiqing, Chen Shaomin, Yuan Changzheng, all now leaders • of FCPPL projects • a lot of interest in BEPC/BES and the next facility BEPC2/BES3

  3. Present IHEP-LAL Project • experiment and phenomenology in ee annihilation and  physics • interest centered on vacuum polarization mostly and QCD studies • provide the best experimental input and understanding of data • 4 activities underway: • (1) VP calculations and studies • (2) evaluate potential and prepare for  physics at BES3 • (3)  spectral functions and precision QCD studies • (4) analysis of BaBar data for precision R measurement • focus today on (1) and (4)

  4. The Actors • at IHEP Yuan Changzheng • Mo Xiaohu • Wang Ping • at LAL Michel Davier • Wang Wenfeng • Zhang Zhiqing • Bogdan Malaescu PhD student • in between Wang Liangliang PhD student • joint supervision (French Embassy) • at CERN Andreas Höcker

  5. Essentials of Hadronic Vacuum Polarization vacuum polarization modifies the interacting electron charge with: photon vacuum polarization function (q2) Leptonic lep(s) calculable in QED. However, quark loops are modified by long-distance hadronic physics, cannot (yet) be calculated within QCD (!) Way out: Optical theorem (unitarity) ... ... and subtracted dispersion relation for (q2) (analyticity) Im[ ]  | hadrons |2 ... and equivalently for a [had]

  6. The Muonic (g–2) Contributions to the Standard Model (SM) Prediction: Dominant uncertainty from lowest order hadronic piece. Cannot be calculated from QCD (“first principles”) – but:we can use experiment (!) The Situation 1995 had  ”Dispersion relation“  had   ...

  7. Improved Determinations of the Hadronic Contribution to (g–2) and (MZ ) 2 Eidelman-Jegerlehner’95, Z.Phys. C67 (1995) 585 • Since then: Improved determi-nation of the dispersion integral: • better data • extended use of QCD • Inclusion of precise  data using SU(2) (CVC) Alemany-Davier-Höcker’97, + later works • Extended use of (dominantly) perturbative QCD Martin-Zeppenfeld’95, Davier-Höcker’97, Kühn-Steinhauser’98, Erler’98, + others Improvement in 4 Steps: • Theoretical constraints from QCD sum rules and use of Adler function Groote-Körner-Schilcher-Nasrallah’98, Davier-Höcker’98, Martin-Outhwaite-Ryskin’00, Cvetič-Lee-Schmidt’01, Jegerlehner et al’00, Dorokhov’04 + others • Better data for the e+e–  +– cross section and multihadron channels CMD-2’02 (revised 03), KLOE’04, SND’05 (revised 06), CMD-2’06, BaBar’04-06

  8. Situation at ICHEP-2006 Hadronic HO – ( 9.8 ± 0.1) 10–10 Hadronic LBL + (12.0 ± 3.5) 10–10 Electroweak (15.4 ± 0.2) 10–10 QED (11 658 471.9 ± 0.1) 10–10 inclu-ding: Knecht-Nyffeler,Phys.Rev.Lett. 88 (2002) 071802 Melnikov-Vainshtein, hep-ph/0312226 Davier-Marciano, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sc. (2004) Kinoshita-Nio (2006) BNL E821 (2004): aexp = (11 659 208.0  6.3) 1010 Observed Difference with Experiment (DEHZ)

  9. The Role of Data through CVC – SU(2) W: I=1 &V,A CVC: I=1 &V : I=0,1 &V  e+   hadrons W e– hadrons Hadronic physics factorizes inSpectral Functions : fundamental ingredient relating long distance (resonances) to short distance description (QCD) Isospin symmetry connects I=1 e+e– cross section to vectorspectral functions: branching fractionsmass spectrum kinematic factor (PS)

  10. SU(2) Breaking Electromagnetism does not respect isospin and hence we have to consider isospin breaking when dealing with an experimental precision of 0.5% • Corrections for SU(2) breaking applied to  data for dominant  – + contrib.: • Electroweak radiative corrections: • dominant contribution from short distance correction SEW to effective 4-fermion coupling  (1 + 3(m)/4)(1+2Q)log(MZ /m) • subleading corrections calculated and small • long distance radiative correction GEM(s) calculated [ add FSR to the bare cross section in order to obtain  – + () ] • Charged/neutral mass splitting: • m–  m0leads to phase space (cross sec.) and width (FF) corrections • - mixing (EM    – + decay)corrected using FF model • m–  m0 and –  0 • Electromagnetic decays, like:     ,    ,    ,   l+l – Marciano-Sirlin’ 88 Braaten-Li’ 90 Cirigliano-Ecker-Neufeld’ 02 Lopez-Castro et al ’06-07 Alemany-Davier-Höcker’ 97, Czyż-Kühn’ 01

  11. e+e-  Data Comparison: 2006 • problems: overall normalization shape (especially above )

  12. Achievements for VP calculations • detailed cross-checks on existing ee   data • (one-month visit of Yuan C.Z. paid by French Embassy) • small problem discovered (VP correction in KLOE) • /ee comparison completely revisited • use new calculation for long-distance SU(2)-breaking • question raised about the proper way to apply CVC •  spectral function to be related to bare or dressed ee SF ? • dressed ee SF would solve the discrepancy • tests of procedure proposed, but found to be inconclusive • unable for the moment to find theoretical proof (or disproof) • results presented in muon g-2 workshop (Glasgow, Oct. 2007)

  13. Magnitude of the VP effect (0)()   12 (1+FSR) bare +FSR dressed VP FSR at s = m2 leptonic VP 2.5% hadronic VP 1  4% mass shift from resonant VP: mRmR(0)  3 Ree / 2  1.4 MeV for 

  14. e+e-  with dressed ee SF (tentative) • agreement in overall normalization shape much better still not perfect (region around 950 MeV, but small impact)

  15. Measuring R with BaBar (ISR) ISR • Precise measurements of cross section for all significant processes, e+e hadrons, from threshold to ~4-5GeV • Measure , KK channels with high precision • Summing up exclusive cross sections==>Improve the precision of R M. Davier et al., 2003 X = 2E /Ecm Pre-BaBar Ös

  16. R Measurements with BaBar (ISR) • exclusive multihadron channels essentially done • results soon on precision //KK (< 1%) • Wang Wenfeng, Wang Liangliang (PhD), MD   g-2

  17. Conclusions • we are engaged in a long-term collaboration effort in order to • get the best ee annihilation and  decay data for vacuum • polarization calculations and QCD studies • most important involvement with ALEPH, BES2, and BaBar data • long-standing ee/ discrepancy revisited: some improvement, • some ideas, but more theoretical support needed • short-term goal: precise determination of ahad using ee data to • confirm/refute the present tantalizing 3.3 discrepancy with SM • long-term goal: significantly improve had (s) for EW tests at • LHC and ILC (Higgs mass) • the other topics will be pursued

More Related