1 / 16

Michael Gallagher Executive Director

Michael Gallagher Executive Director. The new normal in higher education policy. We must take the current when it serves.

burton
Download Presentation

Michael Gallagher Executive Director

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Michael Gallagher Executive Director The new normal in higher education policy Group of Eight, 1 October 2014

  2. We must take the current when it serves Brutus:There is a tide in the affairs of men. Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune; Omitted, all the voyage of their life Is bound in shallows and in miseries. On such a full sea are we now afloat, And we must take the current when it serves, Or lose our ventures. Julius Caesar Act 4, scene 3, 218–224

  3. Number of students in Higher Education, Australia 1906-2012 A presentation to <Insert client name in footer> Arial Regular 10pt

  4. Trend spending per student in constant pricesCGS (or equivalent) per EFTSL, real 2013 dollars, 1989-2013 and estimated CGS per EFTSL, real 2013 dollars to 2016

  5. Budget estimates of Commonwealth Grant Scheme expenditure, 2009-10 to 2013-14 ($’000)

  6. Projected growth in population aged 16-18 years by state and territory, Australia 2012-2040 A presentation to <Insert client name in footer> Arial Regular 10pt

  7. Aggregate national research citations per paper

  8. Trends in Australian university rankings on QS indicators, 2005- 2014/15

  9. Graduate earnings • Graduates earn on average $1.2 million more over their lifetimes than non-graduates. • Graduates enjoy above average income growth over the course of their careers. Average graduate incomes grew in real terms at a rate of 5.7% per annum over the first five years of employment and 2.0% thereafter. Economy wide, real wages grow by around 1.0% per annum. • In 2011, the top 20% of full time workers were earning at least $93,739. Graduates were over represented in this category, with more than 28% earning above this amount. After 20 years, 42% of graduates are in the top 20% of earners. Less than 12% of workers without any post-secondary qualifications earn this amount. • By age 35, the average full-time employed graduate is $500 a week ahead of the average full-time employee without post-school qualifications. • Over the life of a HELP loan, average weekly repayments are below $100 for graduates of all fields except Medicine and Dentistry

  10. Weekly graduate premiumDifference between average weekly earnings of graduates and non-graduates in full-time employment

  11. The available evidence suggests that students are not deterred by fees • There was no change in low SES enrolment shares over the 1990s, and the move to differential HECS in 1997 did not adversely affect low SES participation in any field of study (Andrews, 1999; Aungles et al, 2002) • Low SES students are more concerned about the ‘”perceived relevance of higher education” than the cost of participation, and they are more concerned about costs of living while studying than tuition fees (James, 2002). • “there is a considerable body of research suggesting that there have been no discernible effects on university enrolments of relatively poor students from either the introduction of or changes to HECS” (Beer & Chapman, 2005) • There is no evidence that the size of a HELP debt affects decisions about leaving home, getting married or buying a house (Marks, 2008). • From a study of nine countries, “(The) available data suggest that changes in fees (i) have no effect with respect to the gender composition of the student body), (ii) have little to no effect on the proportion of students drawn from lower socio-economic backgrounds, and (iii) have little to no effect on the ethnic composition of the student body” (Usher, 2014).

  12. Indicative Fees for Fee Paying Masters Coursework, Domestic and International, 2012(outliers removed to show main spread) A presentation to <Insert client name in footer> Arial Regular 10pt

  13. Some facts about US higher education • For a 2-year Associate Degree annual tuition fees at public community colleges averaged $3,080 in 2012-13 • For a 4-year undergraduate degree annual tuition costs in 2012-13 ranged from an average of $8,005 in public (in-state institutions), $14,914 in private for-profit institutions, to $29,115 in private non-profit institutions). • Average Bachelor degree graduate debt in 2011-12 was $25,640 for 4-year public institutions, $32,308 for private non-profit, and $40,038 for private for-profit institutions. • In 2011-12, only 1 in 200 US graduates had a debt in excess of $100,000, primarily graduates of private universities with postgraduate qualifications in fields like Medicine and Pharmacy. • Around 40% of the reported trillion $ of graduate debt related to postgraduate not undergraduate studies.

  14. Changing assumptions about higher education • Rationed student access V Ensuring inclusion • Campus-based instruction V Self-organised learning • Knowledge content curriculum & assessment V Disciplinary & generic capabilities • Integrated academic workforce V Specialised & multiple roles • Provider-centred, supply-side approach V Student-centred, demand-side approach • National & sub-national planning orientation V international market orientation • Reliance on government funding V Diversity of funding sources

  15. Unbundling Higher Education Supply side unbundling – compartmentalising and disaggregating delivery processes • Teaching: e.g. use of externally contracted staff to teach, draft curricula or develop resources • Teaching & awards: e.g. portability of the higher education ‘product’ in the form of degree award validation and the external delivery of curricula through franchising and partnership provision Demand side unbundling – compartmentalising and disaggregating outputs or consumption • Personally tailored learning: e.g. quicker or multiple routes to qualification, pay-as-you-go credit accumulation, optional purchasing of resources, learning support and facilities • Educational resources: e.g. formal and informal access to on-line resources UniversitiesUK, 2012

  16. Higher Education Policy & Financing Models Planning orientation (central government determination) Q1Q2 Supply- drivenDemand-driven (primacy of provider interests) (primacy of student interests) Q3Q4 Market orientation (competition among rival providers) Gallagher, 2000

More Related