1 / 13

Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth

Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth. Using meaningful evaluation to increase effectiveness of teachers and leaders. Overview Rationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs. ▲. The central focus of READY is improving student learning.

caldwell-campbell
Download Presentation

Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth Using meaningful evaluation to increase effectiveness of teachers and leaders

  2. OverviewRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ The central focus of READY is improving student learning ... by enabling and ensuringgreat teaching.

  3. What is our goal?Rationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ Before Teaching and Leading Develop effective teachers and leaders in preparation programs Great Teachers and LeadersAn effective teacher in every classroom and leader in every school Student Readiness Achievement and growth for all students During Teaching and Leading Use meaningful evaluation and professional development to increase effectiveness of teachers and leaders

  4. Measures of Effective TeachingRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ This research suggests: • Multiple measures are important. • Including student growth improves objectivity of evaluation.

  5. Standards 6 & 8 – The BasicsRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ • Teachers 1 2 3 4 5 6 Contribute to Academic Success Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment KnowContent Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice • Principals (and other Administrators) 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Human Resource Leadership External Development Leadership Micro-politicalLeadership Academic Achievement Leadership Strategic Leadership InstructionalLeadership Cultural Leadership ManagerialLeadership Strategic Leadership

  6. Growth ModelRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ Standards 6 and 8 are measures of Growth • Teachers 6 Contribute to Academic Success • Principals 8 Academic Achievement Leadership Academic Achievement Leadership

  7. Growth ModelRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ We will useEducator Value-Added Assessment System EVAASfor standards 6 & 8 when possible • Teachers 6 Contribute to Academic Success • Principals 8 Academic Achievement Leadership Academic Achievement Leadership

  8. Teacher Ratings CategoriesRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ • Teachers 1 2 3 4 5 6 Contribute to Academic Success Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment KnowContent Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice • 5 Rating Categories • 3 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

  9. Status Rationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ • Teachers6 separate ratings to help teachers grow each year • Principals8 separate ratings to help principals grow each year Ratings Status • A single overall status that is determined once a principal or teacher has three years of growth data to populate 6 or 8 • Categories for Status In Need of Improvement Effective Highly Effective

  10. Status and Standard 6 & 8 Rationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ • An educator receives an effectiveness status only once she has 3 years of data on standards 6 or 8 • A 3-year rolling average of growth data from standards 6 or 8 is used as part of determining overall status

  11. Teacher Status Rationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ 1 2 3 4 5 Establish Environment KnowContent Facilitate Learning Demonstrate Leadership Reflect on Practice Standards 1-5In the year Proficient or Higher on Standards1-5 Any rating lower than proficient Accomplishedor Higher on Standards1-5 And/Or And And Standard 6Three-year rolling average Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets or Exceeds Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth ) / 3 ) 6 6 6 + + 2 years ago 1 year ago Thisyear

  12. Growth Data for World Language Teachers ▲ B A C D Courses Focused on Performance Locally Developed Courses MSLs EOCs,EOGs and VoCATS • Guidance from DPI by 2013- 2014 on appropriate methods to gather and analyze evidence of student learning. • School administrators will examine evidence of student work in order to determine the teachers' 6th standard rating.

  13. Four Buckets of Assessments for GrowthRationale - MET Research - Standards 6 & 8 - Status - Support - MSLs ▲ • Assessment Common Across Districts • Growth using EVAAS A B C D Courses Focused on Performance Locally Developed Courses MSLs EOCs,EOGs and VoCATS • Guidance from DPI with local implementation options • Growth determined by evaluator

More Related