1 / 7

Project: IEEE P802.19 Coexistence TAG Submission Title: Coexistence Classes Update

Project: IEEE P802.19 Coexistence TAG Submission Title: Coexistence Classes Update Date Submitted: 13 November, 2002 Source: Jim Lansford, Company Mobilian Corporation Address 7431 NW Evergreen Pkwy, Hillsboro, OR 97124

callia
Download Presentation

Project: IEEE P802.19 Coexistence TAG Submission Title: Coexistence Classes Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project: IEEE P802.19 Coexistence TAG Submission Title:Coexistence Classes Update Date Submitted: 13 November, 2002 Source: Jim Lansford, Company Mobilian Corporation Address 7431 NW Evergreen Pkwy, Hillsboro, OR 97124 Voice:+1 405 377 6170, FAX: +1 425 671 6099, E-Mail: jim.lansford@mobilian.com Re: Abstract: Additional work on the concept of coexistence classes, where the coexistence of one system with another is assigned a score Purpose: For discussion Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.19. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.19. Jim Lansford, Mobilian, Henry Nielsen, ST Micro

  2. Coexistence Classes Update Jim Lansford jim.lansford@mobilian.com +1 405 377 6170 Henry Nielsen ST Microelectronics henry.nielsen@st.com Jim Lansford, Mobilian, Henry Nielsen, ST Micro

  3. Overview • Goals: Allow coexistence to be scored or graded • WGs can use in selection criteria • 802.19 can use to grade proposals • Initial presentation in September • Levels 0-4 • Augmented over time to allow more fine-grained • Need more help to move this forward Jim Lansford, Mobilian, Henry Nielsen, ST Micro

  4. Review: Varying facets of Coexistence • Ability of a system to • Perform its own tasks, possibly in hostile environment • Detect other systems • Adapt to presence of other systems • Reduce impact of its operation on other systems • Negotiate with other systems • Are to be evaluated both in-band and out-of-band • Depend strongly on separation distance • Are defined and conceived of differently in each organization Jim Lansford, Mobilian, Henry Nielsen, ST Micro

  5. Review: Proposed Coexistence Classes 0 Ignorant of possibility that other systems or protocols may exist • Aware that others may exist, expects them to make any adaptations • Aware that others may exist, unilaterally acts to reduce impact • Actively detects others, unilaterally acts to reduce impact on them • Actively detects others, negotiates with them to optimize mutual performance A device or system may be characterized by different coexistence classes in different bands. e.g. An AFH Bluetooth WPAN is class-3 wrt 802.11b, but may be class-0 for some proprietary ISM systems Jim Lansford, Mobilian, Henry Nielsen, ST Micro

  6. Possible Grading Scale • Included criteria such as throughput degradation, latency, jitter, etc. • Proposal evaluation – who does? • How objective can this grading scale be? • Can 802.19 really do this? (or back on WG to assist) Jim Lansford, Mobilian, Henry Nielsen, ST Micro

  7. Next steps • PHY vs PHY+MAC evaluation • SIR can give 1st cut at throughput degradation • Interference quantifies problem, grading gives indication of expected improvement • Need to flesh out grading criteria • Examples: AFH, 802.15.2 AWMA, 802.15.2 PTA • 802.11h (DFS/TPC) • Can this be turned into a general procedure? Jim Lansford, Mobilian, Henry Nielsen, ST Micro

More Related