1 / 7

Smart specialisation in Slovenia

Smart specialisation in Slovenia. Some economic data of Slovenia. Basic documents. Law on R&D (2002): SRA , TIA Slovenian Developement Strategy (2005) OP 2007–2013 RISS (2011) and NPHE (2011) and RI (2011) Tax allowance – 100 %. SIP ( Slovenian Industrial Policy ) (2/2013)

cameo
Download Presentation

Smart specialisation in Slovenia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Smart specialisation in Slovenia

  2. Some economic data of Slovenia

  3. Basic documents • Law on R&D (2002): SRA, TIA • SlovenianDevelopementStrategy (2005) • OP 2007–2013 • RISS (2011) andNPHE (2011) andRI (2011) • Taxallowance – 100 %. • SIP (SlovenianIndustrialPolicy) (2/2013) • SDS 2 (2014-2020) – pubčlic debate closed 9/2013. • S3 ...

  4. Phases of S3 • 12/2012-5/2013: Background analysis, preeliminary identification of priorities; • 5/2013-7/2013: 13 working sessions organised by Chamber of Commerce; drafting a strategy; • 7/2013-8/2013: Public consultation; • 9/2013-12/2013: Cross-check of comments, cleaning of the text; • Early 2014: final text adopted.

  5. Methodology • 1 person engaged at MEDT and 2 at GZS. After that interdepartmental coordination. • Public debate – 13 workshops, interested public. • After the end of public debate – no feedback. • „Secrecy“ of phases …

  6. Outcome(s) • A drafted text, serving for public debate. • S3 mostly „in line“ with adopted documents, but in some cases too ambitious. • Lack of clear delimitation of authorities. • Slowness of the process.

  7. Some remarks • The text is not consistent neither with itself nor with other adopted documents. • S3 priorities are vague and undefined. • Just few attention is devoted to non-manufacturing innovations (services!). • There are some overlapping sentences and description – inaccuracy. • The position of different institutions – SPIRIT; JAPTI; SEF; TIA; ARRS? • Problems with monitoring – who and why?

More Related