1 / 12

Creation of Bathymetric Surfaces Using High-Density Point Surveys

Explore different interpolation methods using data from Trinity River Restoration Project. Evaluate surfaces created at varying point densities. Compare metrics like RMSE, time, and more.

carlluna
Download Presentation

Creation of Bathymetric Surfaces Using High-Density Point Surveys

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Creation of Bathymetric Surfaces Using High-Density Point Surveys Mark Schmelter CEE 6440 GIS in Water Resource Engineering Fall 2007

  2. Relevance to W.R. Engineering • New methods of data collection and analysis are constantly evolving • e.g., multi-dimensional hydraulic models • e.g., LiDAR, SoNAR • Hydraulics = f(bathymetry, planform) • Habitat models rely upon hydraulics • Geomorphic models rely upon hydraulics • Etc.

  3. Objectives • Evaluate: • Differences between interpolation methods • Differences between interpolated surfaces resulting from differing point densities

  4. Data and their Origins • Point data file from Trinity River Restoration Project (TRRP) • Collected using Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry (ALB) technology • Helicopter-mounted green and infra-red LiDAR • Horizontal precision = 2.5m • Vertical precision = 0.25m • Rated to water depth of 50m in ‘good’ conditions • Trinity data collected in December 2003 (6m max depth)

  5. "Everything is related to everything else, but near things are more related than distant things" (Tobler 1970) • Inverse Distance Weighted • Fast, very simple algorithm, easy paramaterization • Ordinary Kriging • Not fast, complicated parameterization • Robust statistical method • Local Polynomial Interpolation • Fast, easy parameterization (idiot-proof?) • Complicated; fits polynomial eqns to data Tobler, W. R. (1970). "A computer model simulation of urban growth in the Detroit region." Economic Geography, 46(2), 234-240.

  6. Full dataset 10% of full dataset 100% 85% 70% 55% 40% 25% 10%

  7. Reminder of objectives 1 & 2 • See how surfaces vary between methods • See how surfaces vary with changing point densities

  8. Metrics • RMSE • Mean residuals • Time to compute • Cross-validation: • Remove one point from the data, interpolate, then compare the interpolated value at the removed location to the removed value Red: Mean residual = -4.498; RMSE = 8.094 Black: Mean residual = 0.1142; RMSE = -2.817

  9. RMSE Mean Residual Time to compute

  10. In the end… • 12:12 versus 0:46 • Unless you need to have a standard deviation surface (e.g., to create a confidence interval on your surface), just use IDW or LPI • If you want to have a confidence interval on your surface, you must use kriging

  11. Questions? Kriged map of 55% subset Standard deviation map of 55% subset

More Related