1 / 28

Elliptical vs Spiral

Elliptical vs Spiral. NGC 4649. NGC 4649. Visible. Far-UV . (2500 A) . (1500 A) . "UV UPTURN ". T e ~ 20000 K. "UV UPTURN ". "Burstein Relation" . (SAURON sample ETGs, GALEX). (IUE). bluer. Bureau et al., MNRAS, 414, 1887, 2011. Minimum T e for FUV output. Post AGB. .

carlo
Download Presentation

Elliptical vs Spiral

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Elliptical vs Spiral NGC 4649 NGC 4649 Visible Far-UV

  2. (2500 A) (1500 A)

  3. "UV UPTURN"

  4. Te ~ 20000 K "UV UPTURN"

  5. "Burstein Relation" (SAURON sample ETGs, GALEX) (IUE) bluer Bureau et al., MNRAS, 414, 1887, 2011

  6. Minimum Te for FUV output

  7. Post AGB . Post EHB .

  8. Omega Centauri – FUV CMD EHB and Post-EHB Omega Centauri FUV Image (UIT)

  9. UV-Optical Colors in Coma Cluster(Smith et al. 2012) bluer

  10. UV-Optical Colors in Coma ClusterColors vs Velocity Dispersion bluer Smith et al., MNRAS, 421, 2982, 2012

  11. UV-Optical Colors in Coma ClusterColors vs Age & Metallicity bluer Smith et al., MNRAS, 421, 2982, 2012

  12. "Residual Star Formation" (0.1-1 Gyr) in ETG's:Intermediate-Age Populations

  13. Distinguishing RSF from UV-Upturn in ETG's (Kaviraj 2007) Strongest UV-upturn At least 30% of ETGs exhibit RSF UV colors

  14. Supp-Ex

  15. UV CMD for M32 (Brown, et al. 2008)

  16. UV CMD for M32 (Brown, et al. 2008) ~ No PAGB stars Few P-EHB stars EHB

  17. Simulation: [Fe/H] = -0.25, Y = normal Bimodal HB, 2% in EHB Small scatter in extinction Brown et al. 2008

  18. Extended Emission Line Gas in SAURON ETG's (Sarzi 2006)

  19. Globular Clusters vs Galaxies (DOR 95)

  20. M87 Globulars vs MWGC, Galaxies (Sohn et al. 2006)

  21. Supp-Ex

  22. Post AGB . Post EHB .

  23. * } } ☉ H H P P ☉ m     g Ṁ Ṁ Arial 24 Map: U-I color Contours: Radio Feedback GillSansMT-bold Helv24 Shadowed helvetica calibri

  24. Special Fonts  _ _    

More Related