1 / 10

The evolved psychological apparatus

The evolved psychological apparatus. By Evan and Tyler. Resource exploitation. Decline of flora and fauna as a direct result of human exploitation. Indirect result of habitat loss due to human expansion. Evolutionary informed model of homo economicus.

carlow
Download Presentation

The evolved psychological apparatus

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The evolved psychological apparatus By Evan and Tyler

  2. Resource exploitation • Decline of flora and fauna as a direct result of human exploitation. • Indirect result of habitat loss due to human expansion.

  3. Evolutionary informed model of homo economicus • Humans are not naturally conservationists. • Natural selection dictates that those with the greatest reproductive success are those that most readily exploit resources faster than their competitors. • Humans are not rational actors contrary to the view of modern economics. • Homo sapiens are more likely to discount the future and focus on more immediate goals. • Averse to relinquishing a prior gain.

  4. Contingent Valuation Method • How much would person be willing to pay to preserve a non-economic good (i.e. clean air, wetlands, recreational areas, etc.) • Places an economic value onto a non-tradable good. • Is destroying a particular habitat worth the economic exploitation?

  5. Risk as Variance of Expected Payoffs • Adaptations such as time preferences, social comparison processes, and sex differences may play important roles in conservation. • Humans will run the risk of living in a high variance environment if there is a significant upside to be attained.

  6. Let’s talk about sex • Sex differences in risk acceptance and resource use. • Higher intrasexual competition in the ancestral environment may have lead men to be more risk accepting. • Men may be more willing to exploit the environment for social status and an increased likelihood for reproduction.

  7. More Sex :/ • Men are significantly less likely to see a physician as women. • Men are more likely to disregard an unhealthy environment for a higher payoff (i.e. taking a better paying job in a more unhealthy environment).

  8. Conclusions • Imperative to understand human psychology in an evolutionary context in order to combat environmental degradation. • As our way of life revolves around economics, finding economic values for environmental goods is a first step in conservation. • Women may play a large role influencing male psychology toward being health conscious.

  9. Economics of conservation • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDP5IB4aSvQ

  10. Discussion Questions • Given the limited economic means of the majority of homo sapiens around the world, is CVM actually a viable means of placing value on environmental and health goods? • Noting the differences between men and women regarding risk taking and health consciousness, in what ways could women possibly alter male psychology toward a more sustainable outlook? • Given the studies prevented, what is the most reasonable course of action for harnessing human psychology for the sake of sustainability?

More Related