1 / 22

Publication strategies

Publication strategies. Carlo Ghezzi Politecnico di Milano, Italy carlo.ghezzi@polimi.it. Outline: why not follow SE best practices?. Stakeholders and goals Who set the goals? What are the goals to achieve? Requirements Operationalization of goals in a desirable process Implementation

carolos-alex
Download Presentation

Publication strategies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Publication strategies Carlo Ghezzi Politecnico di Milano, Italy carlo.ghezzi@polimi.it NSEFS-07

  2. Outline: why not follow SE best practices? • Stakeholders and goals • Who set the goals? • What are the goals to achieve? • Requirements • Operationalization of goals in a desirable process • Implementation • Your job NSEFS-07

  3. The global scientific community Your department You Stakeholders and goals NSEFS-07

  4. How to evaluate people based on publications? • (Of course, publications are not the only criterion to be considered) • Quality vs. quantity metrics • Easier to evaluate quantity than quality! • But quantity is self-referential, it does not lead to the ultimate goals • Quality evaluated by • In-depth scrutiny • Reviewers, interested peers • Default rating based on the publication venue Publication strategy is important here NSEFS-07

  5. The role of publication venues • Your work must be good … but it gets the attention it deserves if the publication venue has a good reputation • archival journal • flagship conference • specialized workshop where the main experts meet • … NSEFS-07

  6. Domain knowledge (1) • Each area has its top archival journals and other less prestigious , perhaps more specific, journals and magazines • Each area has its top conferences and more focused symposia/workshops • Conferences, symposia, workshops are venues where you can meet your peers and where you become part of the community NSEFS-07

  7. Domain knowledge (2) • Conferences/symposia/workshops require shorter papers than journals • They accept "less complete", "less mature" results • They have shorter (and predictable) turnaround time NSEFS-07

  8. Requirements for a strategy • Clearly understand scopes of different publication venues • Aim at covering both journals and conferences/symposia/workshops • Follow an incremental publication strategy for your work • early notification of your work • early feedback • start with workshop papers, as a way for you enter the field • significant intermediate results appear in the major conferences of the field • complete research, from conception to evaluation, appears in journal papers NSEFS-07

  9. Constraints • Never republish the same material • Make sure that each time you have a significant amount of material to add • typically a journal requires 20-30% new material that wasn't in the originating conference paper(s) • later comments on "ethical issues" • Avoid the LPU ("least publishable unit") syndrome NSEFS-07

  10. The peer review process paper submission paper to reviewers reviews collected decision made NSEFS-07

  11. More on peer reviews (1) • Peer reviews aim at assuring quality • Quality depends on venue -> different thresholds • carefully read the requirements specified in the journal/conference web site and comply with them • satisfy time constraints/formatting/length… NSEFS-07

  12. More on peer reviews (2) • Peer reviewers do a voluntary job • help them to help you • don't give them an easy way to reject your work, submit your best (final) version • provide them useful feedback (only possible for journals) • accompanying letter for resubmissions NSEFS-07

  13. Implementation Build your publication portfolio NSEFS-07

  14. ACM/IEEE top journals Other SE journals Top flagship conferences Specialized conferences Workshops ASE, SP&E, SCP, SPIP, JSS JSM, REJ, ESE, IEE Proc. Sw. ICSE ESEC/FSE TOSEM TSE ISSTA RE SM … Often attached to conferences My biased suggested (selected) targets for SE JACM TOPLAS TC … OOPSLA, POPL … IEEE Sw IEEE Computer NSEFS-07

  15. Writing style pills: audience • Each venue has a reference audience, and you write for an audience • Target themes may differ • Emphasis on theory/principles vs. tools/empirical studies • Journal/conference NSEFS-07

  16. Writing style pills: structure • Title and abstract • short and informative • Introduction • the problem, the current status, the proposed solution, the outline • State of the art • be fair and complete, go back to sources • there is more than the web and wikipedia! • The proposed solution • Comparison with competing approaches • Limitations and future work NSEFS-07

  17. Writing style pills: "details" • Get rid of grammatical errors and spelling errors • ask a native language friend for help • spell check!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! • Make figures readable • Comply with font size and page limit requirements NSEFS-07

  18. Personal recommendations (1) • Find your way through the publication jungle • Favor established venues with high reputation and strong records over "easier" targets • Aim at top journals but get there in a stepwise manner via conferences NSEFS-07

  19. Personal recommendations (2) • Don't be frustrated by rejections • good ideas and good work are a necessary but not sufficient precondition for an acceptable paper • Don't be obsessed by publication • be confident in what you are doing • the purpose of publication IS NOT species selection • Strictly adhere to the ethical code NSEFS-07

  20. Ethical code (1) • The ends don't justify the means • NO double submissions • Corollary • Do not submit to a journal until the conference paper that subsumes the journal paper is presented • Ask for permission if you wish to submit prior to presentation • NEVER report data/facts that are unsubstantiated • NEVER report as yours work done by others NSEFS-07

  21. Ethical code (2) • You do not live in isolation • There is no justification for ignoring previous work and history of the field • Give proper credits to previous and contextual work • but then when you are a referee, don't reject a paper simply because it did not refer to one of your minor papers… NSEFS-07

  22. Ethical code (3) • Take reviews seriously • Peer reviews are fundamental to improve scientific work • Help the community as a reviewer • You may say no, but more often you should say yes NSEFS-07

More Related