1 / 18

Led by Prof Mark Henaghan Multi-disciplinary & International incl Bioethics Centre

Led by Prof Mark Henaghan Multi-disciplinary & International incl Bioethics Centre richman.wee@otago.ac.nz. Funded by. Led by. Rethinking Privacy Safeguards for Emerging Technologies & Research in Genomics. Anonymity?. Sequencing the Human Genome.

Download Presentation

Led by Prof Mark Henaghan Multi-disciplinary & International incl Bioethics Centre

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Led by Prof Mark Henaghan Multi-disciplinary & International incl Bioethics Centre richman.wee@otago.ac.nz Funded by Led by

  2. Rethinking Privacy Safeguards for Emerging Technologies & Research in Genomics

  3. Anonymity?

  4. Sequencing the Human Genome *Many samples collected, few processed, ‘combined’ genome  donor identities protected **Made available publicly … but …

  5. ‘Buy’ your personal genome ! 4 Mar 2008 “Big Spender Dan Stoicescu is paying a company to map his genome.” US$ 350,000 Knome’s first customer

  6. The US$ 1000 Genome ! within a few days Univ of California at San Diego Scientists Win Grant to Develop $1,000 Sequencing Technology 9 Oct 2006

  7. Current Genomics Research • Genome Wide Association Studies GWAS • rapidly scanningcomplete sets of DNA or genomes of many people • findgene variations associated with a particular disease • use information to detect, treat and prevent disease • ’eventually’ screen?

  8. Current Genomics Research (2) • UK Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium • Nature 7 Jun 2007 • largest ever genetics study of common diseases • 17,000 people in the UK & their DNA • £ 9 million • 40 research groups, 500 scientists, dozens of instns • analysed almost 10 billion pieces of genetic info, over 2 years

  9. Emerging Ethical and Societal Expectations Re-contacting Participants * Unexpected discoveries * Incidental findings * Expectations and overseas consensus emerging among research, clinical, bioethics communities Withdrawal from ongoing & future research

  10. Research Design, Practice & Regulatory Policy (2) Research Design - Maximum protection * Anonymisation (irreversible de-identification) But if should re-contact participants? * Need to re-identify So how? * Use coded info & tissue (reversible de-identification)

  11. Research Design, Practice & Regulatory Policy (3) • ‘Coded’ • * A step away from being ‘anonymised’ – by • intentionally (or accidentally!) destroying the key • Selectively withholding particular genomic info • * limiting • * ‘degrading’ (masking, scrambling) • * removing uniquely/strongly identifying info • (rare gene variants)

  12. Research Design, Practice & Regulatory Policy (4) • Separate regulatory regimes: • * Information – eg Privacy Act & HIPC • * Human Tissue – eg HDC Code of Consumers’ Rights • Tissue can & will continue provide great amount of information but, for wider sharing opportunities tissue is finite cf digital information about that tissue

  13. What if ... ? … extract completely … data from human tissue … store in a digital medium eg external hard drive? many more steps away … but a step closer with each tech development & research A question of how fast & when ??

  14. Projecting ahead ... So far, what to do if anonymisation desirable More challenging - over time, anonymisation truly achievable to protect privacy ?  rethink greater or different safeguards needed?

  15. Statutory Provision? Protect Research Participants’ information * Power to issue statutory Certificate of Confidentiality * authorises Researchers to protect Participants’ identity * by withholding Participants’ identifying characteristics from those not connected with the research * Authorised Researchers may not be compelled to disclose – in any “civil, criminal, administrative, legislative or other proceedings” – information that would reveal the identity of research participants * eg Public Health Service Act 301 (d), 42 USC 241(d)

  16. Jim Watson’s personal genome • Published and publicly available ... but • * partially withheld-Alzheimer’s risk • * Jim’s own health • * health status of family members • - grandmother • - his sister • - son Rufus

  17. Rethinking Privacy Safeguards for Emerging Techs & Rsch in Genomics The ability to sequence, scan and screen – scary or savvy ? For a copy, go to ‘Resources’ @ www.otago.ac.nz/law/genome/

More Related