1 / 26

Catastrophe Modeling in the Caribbean

17 May 2005. Catastrophe Modeling in the Caribbean. The Issue. Hurricane Ivan caused an estimated $11 billion damage in the Caribbean and USA Grenada (7 Sep 04) Cayman Islands (11-12 Sep 04) Gulf of Mexico / Offshore Marine (13-15 Sep 04) United States (16-24 Sep 04)

Download Presentation

Catastrophe Modeling in the Caribbean

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 17 May 2005 Catastrophe Modeling in the Caribbean

  2. The Issue • Hurricane Ivan caused an estimated $11 billion damage in the Caribbean and USA • Grenada (7 Sep 04) • Cayman Islands (11-12 Sep 04) • Gulf of Mexico / Offshore Marine (13-15 Sep 04) • United States (16-24 Sep 04) • Third highest insured natural perils loss in history • “According to the NHC, Ivan is the sixth-strongest storm to ever hit the Atlantic basin” (13 Sep 04)

  3. Hurricane Ivan track

  4. The Issue • Insurer insolvencies and impairment • “Industry PMLs” provided insufficient levels of protection • Cat models did not generally anticipate the extent of storm surge damage in the Cayman Islands

  5. The Caribbean • 26 countries • Hundreds of islands • 38 million people • Three major languages • Spanish 65% • French 22% • English 14% • Approximate land size and population of the USA between Pennsylvania and Maine • Spread out over an area roughly equivalent to the USA east of the Mississippi

  6. The Caribbean • Huge natural perils exposure • Atlantic hurricane track • Caribbean plate • Market standard natural perils deductibles • Typically 2% of insured values • Can be higher • Property insurance rates vary from 0.3% to 3.0% (and higher) • Depending on geographical location, recent loss activity, historical activity, perceived exposure, occupancy, construction, coverage, quality, cat modeling, and market practice • Little or no rate regulation

  7. “PML”Definitions • “MPL” (Maximum Possible Loss) for any given portfolio is 100% of insured values (less deductibles) • Absolute worst case • “MFL” (Maximum Foreseeable Loss) for any given portfolio may be lower than 100% • Generally associated with the extreme “tail” of a distribution (e.g., cat model output, realistic disaster scenario) • “PML” (Probable Maximum Loss) for any given portfolio may be lower than 100% • Explicitly or implicitly associated with a frequency (“return period”) • There exist a range of PMLs for various interested parties with various risk appetites

  8. “PML” • Could be 100% for any given location • Mathematically, limited to the range (0%, 100%) • 0% at frequent return periods (e.g., per day, per month) • 100% at remote return periods (e.g., per millenium, per eon)

  9. “PML”Historical practice • Historically, based on extrapolation of extreme events from relatively small sample event sets • Insurance and Reinsurance market rules of thumb • Regulatory requirements • Rating agency requirements

  10. “PML”Caribbean practice • Caribbean companies have historically been among the leaders in cat risk management of necessity • Reinsurer pricing and PMLs guide market practice • Explicitly split rates (Fire vs Cat premium) • CRESTA system set up in 1977 to capture exposure data by zone • Caribbean exposures by CRESTA zone were generally provided on reinsurance submissions

  11. “PML”Caribbean practice • USVI 25% • Caymans 15% - 20% • Bahamas 8% - 15% • Barbados 10% - 15% • BVI 10% - 25% • Market practice can and does vary widely from insurer to insurer due to variances in deductibles, spread of exposure, quality of construction, level of capitalization, and risk appetite

  12. “PML”Current practice • Exposure data capture and quality • Hazard frequency and severity • Hurricane • Earthquake • Other perils • Damage functions • Wind • Water • Shake • Fire following

  13. “PML”Current practice • Financial variables • Coverages • Deductibles • Coinsurance • Insurance to value • Sublimits • Hours clauses • Loss Adjustment Expense • Demand surge • Combination of factors produces “PML” estimates • Cat models often provide our current best estimates of damage for “modeled” perils and events

  14. “PML”Current practice • Cat models • RMS • EQE • AIR • Reinsurer models • Insurer models • Broker models • Consultant models

  15. “PML”Current practice • Post-event, cat modelers learn from losses and adjust models • Recent Caribbean events • Gilbert (1988) • Hugo (1989) • Marilyn & Luis (1995) • Georges (1998) • Ivan (2004)?

  16. Caribbean PMLsScenario estimates • Caribbean “MFLs” often assume it’s possible for an island to be hit with a SS-5 hurricane • “Close” vs. “Direct” hit? • Fast-moving vs. slow-moving? • Dry vs. wet storm? • Without storm surge or with?

  17. Caribbean PMLsScenario estimates • Limited geographical scope (single island) • Easier to model “small” islands (e.g., Caymans, Barbados, St Croix) • More difficult for “larger” islands (e.g., Puerto Rico, Hispaniola, Cuba), as storm intensity will vary over the island • Portfolio damage is weighted average of individual location damage

  18. Caribbean PMLsProbabilistic estimates • Cat models are collections of event scenarios • Discrete approximations, with probabilities attached to each scenario • Not exhaustive • Limited perils • Calibrated using historical experience • Recalibrated as required, based on research and actual event experience

  19. Risk Management in the Caribbean • Define “PML” as the maximum loss an insurer can reasonably expect to pay with 99% certainty • Define “PML Bust” as the occurrence of an event that produces loss in excess of the “PML” • “PML Bust” is unlikely, but not impossible • “PML Bust” events will in all likelihood happen every year, somewhere in the world

  20. Risk Management in the Caribbean • First principles • PMLs range from 0% to 100% • PMLs are associated with return periods (frequency) • PMLs less than 100% will always (eventually) be exceeded

  21. Risk Management in the Caribbean • Many Caribbean insurance companies cede away most premium proportionally • Geographically concentrated portfolios and high levels of natural perils exposure • Security of insurance product is dependent on security of backing reinsurance and Event Limits purchased • Insurance company net results are largely dependent on overrides and volume (rather than profitability of rates and risk appetite) • Costs can still be high for those who purchase a mix of excess of loss and proportional reinsurance • Geographically concentrated portfolios and high levels of natural perils exposure

  22. Risk Management in the Caribbean • Insurance is a business • It’s impractical to hold capital and/or purchase reinsurance up to full limits (“MPL”) • Suboptimal use of capital • The market (e.g., insureds, regulators, ratings agencies) deems it acceptable to provide less than perfect insurance and reinsurance security • Need to quantify risk appetite • Probability of default • Risk-equivalent returns • Need to use best available tools in a cost-effective manner to make sound business decisions • Multiple cat models, combined with first principles

  23. Risk Management in the Caribbean • Most people want certainty, not “sufficiently low probabilities” • Most insurance companies think and plan in terms of “point estimates” rather than distributions • Regulators want policyholders to be paid • Cat models should be used as a guide, not a rule • Never lose sight of first principles • Deterministic thinking pervades society • Statistics is a relatively young science

  24. C A R I B B E A N S E A

More Related