1 / 16

Home and Away Advantage

Home and Away Advantage. By: Krista Dornfried and Gillian Apps. Goals:. Our main goal was to figure out whether or not there is an advantage for Dartmouth hockey players when they play at home.

catori
Download Presentation

Home and Away Advantage

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Home and Away Advantage By: Krista Dornfried and Gillian Apps

  2. Goals: • Our main goal was to figure out whether or not there is an advantage for Dartmouth hockey players when they play at home. • To do this, our data shows the number of wins and non-wins against teams that are similar in ranking.

  3. Cornell Colgate Rensselaer Boston College Yale Harvard Clarkson St. Lawrence Union Minnesota Harvard St. Lawrence New Hampshire Minnesota-Duluth Mercyhurst Princeton The Competition...

  4. Pre-Test Beliefs • We believe that Dartmouth hockey teams are more likely to win when playing at their home arena.

  5. Dartmouth College

  6. Null Hypothesis • Playing at HOME, or at an AWAY arena has no effect on the outcome of the game. The result of the game has nothing to due with where the game is played. • P= 0.5

  7. Alternate Hypothesis • Dartmouth hockey teams are more likely to win playing at their home arena • Location has an effect on the results of the game. • P> 0.5

  8. Results • We found the probability of Dartmouth winning at home, or winning away. • Here is how we did it: Phome=18/30= 60% Paway=11/30= 36.67%

  9. Initially, we entered our home and away probabilities into the following equation:

  10. In doing this, we found that Phome= 1.095 and Paway=-1.46. Given that we chose to use a significance level of 0.05, we were unable to reject our Null Hypothesis. • 1.095 is not > 1.65 • -1.46 is not < 1.65

  11. What Happened???

  12. We believe that if we had a larger sample size, we would have been able to reject our null hypothesis. • Given the vast difference between our original probabilities we chose to try a different equation.

  13. Here is the new equation:

  14. ****YIPEEEE****

  15. 1.86> 1.65 • Therefore, 1.86 falls into the critical region and we are able to reject our null hypothesis.

  16. Conclusion • Please come out and support the Ice hockey teams! GO DARTMOUTH GO

More Related