1 / 40

Statistics for Experimental HEP Kajari Mazumdar TIFR, Mumbai

Statistics for Experimental HEP Kajari Mazumdar TIFR, Mumbai. Why do we do experiments?.  To study some phenomenon X which could be:. Whether a particular species of particle exist or not. If it does exist what are its properties, like, mass, lifetime, charge, magnetic moment, … .

cecily
Download Presentation

Statistics for Experimental HEP Kajari Mazumdar TIFR, Mumbai

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Statistics for Experimental HEPKajari MazumdarTIFR, Mumbai

  2. Why do we do experiments?  To study some phenomenon X which could be: • Whether a particular species of particle exist or not. • If it does exist what are its properties, like, mass, lifetime, charge, • magnetic moment, … . • If of finite lifetime, then which particles does it decay to? What are • the branching fractions? • Do the distribution of variables/parameters (energy, directions of • daughter particles) agree with theoretical predictions? • To probe what processes can occur and with what probability? • (in a given experimental situation depending on initial particles and • collision energy, of course)

  3. Template of an experiment • Arrange for instances of X. • Record events that might be X. • Reconstruct the measurable quantities of visible particles. • Select events that could be X by applying cuts. • Histogram distributions of interesting variables compare with • Theorectical prediction(s, there may be several in the market.) • Confrontation of Theory with Experiment. • Ask: • Is there any evidence for X or is the null hypothesis refuted? • Given X, what are the parameters involved in the model? • Are the results from the experiment compatible with the predictions • of X?

  4. Data analysis in particle physics • Observe events of a certain type, which has various • uncertianties which are quantified in terms of • probability: • theory is not deterministic, • measuremnets has various random errors • other limitations, like cost, time, .. • Measure characteristics of each event (particle momenta, number of muons, energy of jets,...) • Theories (e.g. SM) predict distributions of these properties up to free parameters, e.g., a, GF, MZ, as, mH, ... • Some tasks of data analysis: • Estimate (measure) the parameters; • Quantify the uncertainty of the parameter estimates; • Test the extent to which the predictions of a theory are • in agreement with the data (→ presence of New Physics?)

  5. Everything is counting experiment in HEP within certain approximations • To measure branching ratio or cross-sections, we count the number of events produced/ observed (account for inefficiency of observation). • To measure the mass of a particle, we use histogram where the entry in each bin is a random (Poisson) process. • This unpredictability is inherent in nature, driven by quantum • mechanical consideration everything becomes probabilistic. • When we want to infer something about the probabilistic processes • that produced the data, we need Statistics.

  6. What happens if there’s nothing ? • In the final analysis, we may make approximations, take a pragmatic approach, or do things acc. to convention. • We need to have good understanding of foundational aspects pf statistics. • Even if your analysis finds no events, this is still useful information about the way the universe is built. • Want to say more than: “We looked for X, we didn’t see it.” • Need statistics – which can’t prove anything. • “We show that X probably has a mass greater than.. OR a coupling smaller than…”

  7. Statistical tools mostly used in particle physics 1. Monte Carlo simulation 2. Likelihood methods to estimate parameters. 3. Fitting of data. 4. Goodness of fit. 5. Toy Monte Carlo: to achieve a given level of confidence given data (Neyman construction).

  8. Monte Carlo simulation • Theoretically, the distributions, perhaps with few unknown parameters, • are beautiful and simple (this is not only a dogma, but a reality) • angular distributions may be flat or is a function of few trigonometric • variables, like, sin Ө, cosӨ; • masses may be described by Cauchy (Breit-Wigner) function, • time distribution may be exponential, or exponential, modulated by • sinusoidal oscillation (neutrino oscillation). • But they are modified due to various complicated effects; e.g., higher • order perturbation effects may by one of the theoretical reasons. • The detector effects (reconstruction and measurement processes), … • A monte carlo simulation starts with a simple distribution and is put • through repeated randomization to take into account of various • unavoidable complications, to finally produce histograms! • This is both computer and man-power intensive.

  9. Concept of Probability A random variable is a numerical characteristic assigned to an element of the sample space;  can be discrete or continuous. Mathematical definition Probability of discrete variable x: P(x) = Lim N(x) / N (N ∞) e.g, coins, dice, cards, .. For continuous x  Probability Density Function (pdf): P(x to x+dx) = P(x) dx e.g, parton (quark, gluon) density functions of proton P(A) is a number obeying the Kolmogorov axioms Problem with mathematical definition : No information is conveyed by P(A) ! All As are considered equally likely. P(A) depends on A and the ensemble. In particle physics, A1, A2: outcomes of a repeatable experiment, say, decays. In frequentist’s interpretation P(Higgs boson exists) = either 0, OR, 1 but we don’t know which one is correct!

  10. Treatment of probability in a subjective way. Baysian interpretation • In particle physics frequency interpretation often most useful, • but subjective probability can provide more natural treatment of non-repeatable phenomena: eg., systematic uncertainties, probability that Higgs boson exists,...  P(A) is degree of belief that A is true. Conditional probability  probability of A, given B = and similarly, probability of B given A= But so so If A, B are independent In Bayesian probability, assume in advance a probability that Higgs boson exists and then interprete the data, taking into account all possibilities which can produce such a data.

  11. Frequentist Use of Bayes Theorem Example: Particle Identification: Particle types e,,,K,p Detector Signals: DCH,RICH,TOF,TRD (different subdetectors through Which particles pass and leave similar signatures. Probability of a signal in DCH to be due to e is determined by probability of an e to leave a detectable signal in DCH, probability of an electron to be produced in a reaction and also total probability of DCh to register signals due to different particles:

  12. Continuous variable Prob. to find x within x+dx: Eg., Parton density function: f(x) is NOT a probability! x must be found somewhere! Cumulative density: prob. to have outcome less than or equal to x

  13. Expectation values Consider continuous r.v. x with pdf f (x). Define expectation (mean) value as Notation (often): ~ “centre of gravity” of pdf. For a function y(x) with pdf g(y), s ~ width of pdf, same units as x, given by. (equivalent) Define covariance cov[x,y] as Variance: Correlation coeff.: For x, y independent: Standard deviation:  Reverse is not true!

  14. Correlation

  15. Statistics • Population: includes all objects of interest  large. Parameters (mean, standard deviation etc.) are associated with a population (m, s). • Sample: only a portion of population convenient, but comes with a cost. Statistic is associated with sample providing the characteristics or measure obtained from a sample. • We compute statistics to estimate parameters. • Variables can be discrete, like, number of events, or continuous, • like, mass of the Higgs boson. • Mean  sum of all values/ no. of values. • Median  mid-point of data after being ranked in ascending order  there are as many numbers above the median, as below. • Mode  the most frequent number in the distribution.

  16. Basic Data description • Weighted mean: • e.g., measurement of tracks using multiple hits. • Sample variance (unbiased estimator of population variance s 2) = • Takes care of the fact that the sample mean is determined • from same set of observations x .

  17. Distribution/pdf Example use in HEP Binomial Branching ratio Multinomial Histogram with fixed N Poisson Number of events found Uniform Monte Carlo method Exponential Decay time Gaussian Measurement error Chi-square Goodness-of-fit Cauchy Mass of resonance Landau Ionization energy loss

  18. The Binomial r=0,1,2,. ..n; 1-p p  q; 0 ≤p≤ 1 Random process with exactly 2 possible outcomes, order not important.  Bernoulli process. Individual success probability p, total n trials and r successes. Mean = np, variance = np(1-p) Eg., 1. Efficiency/Acceptance calculations. 2. Observe n number of W decays, out of which r are of type Wmn, p= branching ratio. Multinomial distribution with m possible outcomes. For ith outcome, pi = success rate, all are failure, ni = random variable here, binomially distributed. Eg. in a histogram with m bins, total no. of N entries, content of each bin is an independent random binomial variable .

  19. Poisson ‘Events in a continuum’ number of events in data. Mean rate n in time (or space) interval. Prob. of finding exactly n events in a given interval: n =0,1,2,…; mean = n, variance = n e.g., 1.cosmic muons reaching the lab., 2.Geiger Counter clicks, 3. Number of scattering events n with cross-section s, for a given luminosity ∫L dt, with Exponential x continuous, mean = x, variance = x2 Proper decay time t of an unstable particle, life time = t,

  20. Two Poissons 2 Poisson sources, means 1 and 2 Combine samples: e.g. leptonic and hadronic decays of W. Forward and backward muon pairs. Tracks that trigger and tracks that don’t . … What you get is a Convolution: P( r )= P(r’; 1) P(r-r’; 2) Turns out this is also a Poisson with mean 1+2 ! Avoids lot of worry! Signal and background, each independent Poisson variable, but total no. of observed events, is also Poisson distributed! In actual experiment total number of observed events = expected signal+ estimated background

  21. Gaussian - ∞ < x < ∞ ; - ∞ < m < ∞ ; s > 0 • Max. height = 1/ s √ (2p). • Height is reduced by factor of √e (~ 61%) at x = m± shalf width at half max. f =probability density for continuous, r.v. x, with mean = m, variance = s2 • Probability of x to be within m ± 0.6745 s = 45% Special case of standard / normalised Gaussian: If y ~ Gaussian with m, s, then x = (y- m)/s follows f (x) 68.27% within 1 95.45% within 2 99.73% within 3 90% within 1.645  95% within 1.960  99% within 2.576  99.9% within 3.290 These numbers apply to Gaussians and only Gaussians!

  22. Central Limit Theorem: Why is the Gaussian Normal? If a continuous random variable x is distributed acc. to any pdf with finite mean and variance, the sample mean on n observations of x will have a pdf which approaches Gaussian for large n. • If xi is a set of independent variables of mean m and variance s2, y= S xi/N, for large N, tends to become Gaussian with mean m and variance (1/N) s2 . Connection among Gaussian, Binomial and Poisson distributions p 0, N∞, Np=m Binomial Poisson N∞ m∞ Gaussian

  23. For large variety of situations, if the experiment is repeated many times, • if the value of the quantity is measured accurately, without any bias, • the results are distributed acc. to Gaussian. • Typically, we assume that the form of experimental resolution is • Gaussian, which may not be the case quite often! • Artificial enhancement of significance of observed deviations. • It is also important to estimate the magnitude of the error correctly • under-estimation of errors by 50%  4 s effect may be actually 2 s!

  24. Multidimensional Gaussian For a set of n Gaussian random variables, not necessarily indepdt, The joint pdf is a multivariate Gaussian: V is the covariance matrix of x’s, symmetric, nxn, V_ii=Var(x_i), V_ij = <(x_i - m_i)(x_j – m_j)> =ρ_ij .s_i . s_j ρ_ij = correlation coeff. for x_i and x_j, | ρ_ij | 2 ≤1. ρ_ij = 0 for x_i, x_j to be independent of each other. Correlation coeff. : ρ=cov(x,y)/ sxs y,

  25. No correlation r = 0 Each elliptical contour  fixed probability With correlations

  26. More on correlation between variables. • Covariance matrix plays very important role in propagation of error in changing variables, from x to y (in first order only!). • -ve covariance  anti-correlation. • Semi-axis of ellipse given by sq. root of eigen values of error matrix. • The ellipse provides the likely range of x, y values and they lie in a region smaller than the rectangle defined by max of x’,y’ values. • For the case of 2-variables, the point X lies outside 1-s.d. ellipsoid • with probability 61%.

  27. Chi-squared Mean=n, Variance = 2n z is continuous random variable = z = sum of squared discrepancies, scaled by expected error, n = 1,2, .. = no. of degrees of freedom; x_i : independent Gaussians. Used frequently to test goodness-of-fit. Confidence level is obtained by integrating the tail of the f distribution (from χ2 upto∞) CL(χ2 )=∫ f(z,n) dz Cumulative distribution of χ2 is useful in judging consistency of data with a model. Since mean =n a reasonable experiment should get χ2 ≈ n Thus reduced χ2 is a useful measure!

  28. About Estimation Probability Calculus Theory Data Given these distribution parameters, what can we say about the data? Given this data, what can we say about the properties or parameters or correctness of the distribution functions? Statistical Inference Theory Data Having estimated a parameter of the theory, we need to provide the error in the estimation as well.

  29. What is an estimator? An estimator is a procedure giving a value for a parameter or property of the distribution as a function of the actual data values A perfect estimator is consistent, unbiased and efficient. Often we have to deal with less than perfect estimator! Minimum Variance Bound

  30. The Likelihood Function Ln L a â • Set of data {x1, x2, x3, …xN}: • Each x may be multidimensional • Probability depends on some parameter a. a may be multidimensional! • Total probability (density) The Likelihood • P(x1;a) P(x2;a) P(x3;a) …P(xN;a)=L(x1, x2, x3, …xN ;a) Given data {x1, x2, x3, …xN} estimate a by maximising the L. In practice usually maximise ln L as it’s easier to calculate and handle; just add the ln P(xi) ML has lots of nice properties (eg., it is consistent and efficient for large N).

  31. ML does not give goodness of fit ! ML will not complain if your assumed P(x;a) is rubbish The value of L tells you nothing. Normalisation of L is important. Quote only the upper limit from analysis. Fit P(x)=a1x+a0 will give a1=0; constant P  L= a0N Just like you get from fitting eg., Lifetime distribution pdf p(t;λ) = λ e -λt So L(λ;t) = λ e –λt(single observed t) , here both t and λ are continuous pdf maximises at t = 0 while L maximises at λ = t . Functionalform of P(t) and L(λ) are different

  32. Lifetime distribution pdf p(t;λ) = λ e -λt So L(λ;t) = λ e –λt(single observed t) Here both t and λ are continuous pdf maximises at t = 0 L maximises at λ = t . Functionalform of P(t) and L(λ) are different Fixed l Fixed t L P t λ

  33. Least Squares Measurements of y at various x with errors  and prediction f(x;a) Probability Ln L To maximise ln L, minimise 2 y χ2 = • Should get 2 1 per data point. Ndegrees Of Freedom=Ndata pts – N parameters Provides ‘Goodness of agreement’ figure which allows for credibility So ML ‘proves’ Least Squares.

  34. Chi Squared Results Extended Maximum Likelihood: Allow the normalisation of P(x;a) to float Predicts numbers of events as well as their distributions Need to modify L Extra term stops normalistion shooting up to infinity Large 2 comes from • Bad Measurements • Bad Theory • Underestimated errors • Bad luck Small 2 comes from • Overestimated errors • Good luck Slide 36

  35. Variance of estimator • One way to do this would be to simulate the entire experiment many times with a Monte Carlo program (use ML estimate for MC). • Log-likehood method: expand around the maximum. • 2nd term is zero. • To a good approximation  • Since • Basically, increase θ, until ln L decreases by -1/2. • For least square estimator:

  36. Hypothesis Testing • Consider a set of measurements pertaining to a particular subset of events: • xi mayrefer to number of muons in the events, the transverse energy of the leading jet, missing transverse energy and so on. • refers to n-dim. joint pdf which depends on the type of event actually produced, eg., For each reaction we consider we will have a hypothesis for the pdf of , e.g., f( | H0), f( |H 1), and so on, where, Hi refers to different possibilities. Say, H0 corresponds to Higgs boson, H1, 2, ..  backgrounds. Now, each event is a point in space, so we put a set of criteria/cuts, called Test statistics: and work out the pdfs such that the sample space is divided into 2 regions, where we accept or reject H0 .

  37. Level of Significance and Efficiency Significance level Probability to reject H0, if it is true: Error of 1st kind To accept H0 when H1 is true Power of test = 1 - b Error of 2nd kind Probability to accept a signal event (signal efficiency) Probability to accept a background event (background efficiency) Purity of selected sample depends on the prior probabilities as well as the efficiencies.

More Related