1 / 40

Fundamental Difference between Urban People Movement and Urban Goods Movement

Fundamental Difference between Urban People Movement and Urban Goods Movement. People Movement Largely single origin-destination Urban Goods Movement Largely “tours” consisting of many linked and usually clustered customer trips covering a day’s work. To/From Cluster & Between Customers.

chenoa
Download Presentation

Fundamental Difference between Urban People Movement and Urban Goods Movement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fundamental Difference between Urban People Movement and Urban Goods Movement • People Movement • Largely single origin-destination • Urban Goods Movement • Largely “tours” consisting of many linked and usually clustered customer trips covering a day’s work. • To/From Cluster & Between Customers. • Customer often specifies time window for service Customers Warehouse

  2. Objective of Pilot Test • Characterize Manhattan Goods Movement Congestion By Time-of-Day (ToD) • Key aspect is “expected travel time” by location by ToD • Use normalized concept of “Average Speed” by Activity: • Access to/from Manhattan • Travel between customers in Manhattan • Receivers tend to be “buyers” of the goods • They substantially influence when the goods are delivered • Implication: • Value pricing should be focused on the Receiver!! • Place incentives on Receivers for off-peak receipts of goods! • Place dis-incentives on Receivers for peak hour receipt of goods!

  3. Quantifying ToD and Spatial Congestion • Method: • Focused on using GPS to objectively measure the performance of the of the urban freight system • Gather frequent (~ every 5 seconds) GPS “Breadcrumb” data: ID, Position, Velocity, Date, Time • Analytically segregate customer stop activity from movement activity • Must be done accurately: • Congestion can look like a customer stop • A customer stop can look like congestion

  4. GPS Data System • Zinc II WinMobileSmartPhone w T*Mobile cellular data com running CoPilot Live satNav software • Live updates every 5 seconds on web • Easy data availability to research team, shipper and receiver • Backup data archived every second on SmartPhone • Ability to send stop list and messages to driver • Relatively inexpensive • $300 hardware, $50 software, $40/month short term data plan

  5. GPS Challenges in NY Met Area • Worst “urban canyon” in US • Position can drift substantially (to parallel street) • Severe congestion can look like drift • GPS is least accurate in speed and heading at low speeds • No GPS in Tunnels • Substantial scatter and noise in both position, speed and heading in: • GWB, especially lower level, • Under elevated transit and expressways

  6. Preliminary Results from Two Carrier • Baldor Specialty Foods • New Deal Logistics (NDL)

  7. Pilot Test:Remote Sensing of Off-Peak Deliveries:BaldorSpecialty Preliminary Results 5 Trucks from Nov 1 through Dec 2, 2009 Alain L. Kornhauser Dec 4, 2009

  8. <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45 Baldor Total (5 trucks) Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded

  9. Baldor Truck #1120 Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45

  10. Baldor Truck #1120 Tour on 11/19/09 2:21:05 to 12:6:43 Segment Color-coded

  11. Baldor Truck #1120 Tour on 11/19/09 2:21:05 to 12:6:43 Speed Color-coded Average Speed 8.5 mph <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45

  12. Baldor (5 Trucks) Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45 • 1st & last trip segment fr/to Hunts Point • Connecticut: 33.4 mph • Long Island: 13.6 mph • New Jersey: 24.2 mph • Manhattan : 13.6 mph

  13. <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45 Baldor Truck #931 Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded

  14. Baldor Truck #1040 Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45

  15. Pilot Test:Remote Sensing of Off-Peak Deliveries:New Deal LogisticsPreliminary Results Initial use of 4 CoPilot | Live SmartPhones from Oct 2 through Oct 14, 2009 Alain L. Kornhauser Oct 19, 2009

  16. NDL Total ; Speed Color-coded <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45

  17. <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45 NDL2; Speed:

  18. <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45 NDL2; Speed:

  19. <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45 NDL2; Speed:

  20. NDL1; Speed:

  21. NDL1; Speed:

  22. NDL1; Speed:

  23. NDL2; P&D Stops:

  24. NDL2; Speed:

  25. NDL2; P&D Stops: Kings Plaza

  26. Tour Stop Segments Lincoln 8AMOct 5, 2009

  27. <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45

  28. Tour Stop Segments – Lincoln 8AMOct 2, 2009

  29. <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45

  30. <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45

  31. Tour Stop Segments – Lincoln 8AM - Wall StOct 7, 2009

  32. <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45

  33. <7mph 7-20 20-35 35-45 >45

  34. Tour Stop Segments – Lincoln 8PM Oct 7, 2009

  35. Tour Stop Segments – Lincoln 5pmOct 13, 2009

  36. Tour Stop Segments – GWB – 7AMOct 2, 2009

  37. Average Stop–Stop Speeds (MPH) by Time-of-Day for Major Tour SegmentsPreliminary results from Pilot Test (Oct 2- Oct 14, 2009)

More Related