1 / 84

”THE EURO And THE DEBT CRISIS ” Economist Henrik Herløv Lund

Presentation for ” Study days of the GUE/NGL” Copenhagen, Hotel Scandic Wednesday , 6. june 2012. ”THE EURO And THE DEBT CRISIS ” Economist Henrik Herløv Lund. Initial Question :. Is the euro as we know it the solution o r p art of the problem o f the debtcrisis ?. CONTENT.

china
Download Presentation

”THE EURO And THE DEBT CRISIS ” Economist Henrik Herløv Lund

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presentation for ”Studydays of the GUE/NGL”Copenhagen, Hotel ScandicWednesday, 6. june 2012 ”THE EURO And THE DEBT CRISIS” Economist Henrik Herløv Lund

  2. Initial Question: Is the euro as weknow it the solution or part of the problem of the debtcrisis?

  3. CONTENT • BACKGROUND AND CAUSES FOR THE DEBTCRISIS. • STRATEGIES AGAINST AND SOLUTIONS FOR THE CRISIS • Appendix (if time): Possible scenarios for the near future?

  4. - -

  5. PERSONAL PRESENTATION: • NAME: Henrik Herloev Lund. • EDUCATION: Economist, University of Roskilde in Denmark. • JOBS: Finans and administration in the public sector in Denmark

  6. WHAT I STAND FOR? • Economic theoretical basis: Left keynesianism • Ideological basis: Defense of Welfarestate and critics of neoliberalism. • Politically independent: Belong to center - left (No member of a specifik political party)

  7. - -

  8. 1 background And causes For the debtcrisis

  9. CONTENT • BACKGROUND: THE FINANCIAL CRISIS • THE DEBT CRISIS: NATIONAL AND GENERAL CAUSES • IS THE EURO –AS WE KNOW IT - PART OF THE PROBLEM?

  10. 1.1. THE FINANCIAL CRISIS

  11. THE FINANCIAL CRISIS IS AN IMPORTANT REASON FOR THE DEBT CRISIS • The financial sektor and housing markets have been severely shaken by the financial crisis • Its meant a serious set back for businesses and a sharp rise in unemployment • There´s been large increases in public deficits and debts

  12. UNEMPLOYMENT RATE 2008 -2011(% of labour force) Source: Euorstat

  13. THE FINANCIAL CRISIS ALSO HAS IMPORTANT CONSEKVENSES FOR THE FUTURE • Because the Financial Crisis has been so deep a shock to western economy, • it´s going to take a long time to overcome it • The impact will be : LOW GROWTH ”AS FAR AS THE EYE CAN SEE”

  14. PROSPECT OF L – ELLER W – SHAPED CRISIS Traditionallydownturn(V – shapedcurve) Multiple up - and downturnsaround a fundamentallyweakgrowth(w – shapedcurve) Longterm trend(L – shaped - curve) 2004 2009 2015/2020

  15. 1.2. THE DEBT CRISIS: SPECIFIC NATIONAL AND GENERAL CAUSES

  16. NATIONAL CAUSES:POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC MISMANAGEMENT • Part of responsability for the crisis do in some countries lie with uncontrolable debt • due to either political mismanagement (e.g. Greece) • or due to financial mismanagement by banks (e.g. Ireland and Spain)

  17. BUT: MORE TO THE PICTURE THAN UNCONTROLLABLE DEBT • The ”Monetary” Union has from the start beenborn • with a deepinequality • in competitivenes

  18. A LARGE INEQUALITY OF COMPETITIVENES • There has from the start been an fatal inequalitity between • on one side a group of ”surplus”- countries in northern Europe • And on the other side a group of ”deficit”- countries in southern Europa

  19. ”SURPLUS” - COUNTRIES • In northern - and central Europe are Germany, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Finland and Austria • They have been characterized by having:- High productivity and competitiveness,- ”higher” growth rates, - and relatively large surplus in balance of payment.

  20. ”DEFICIT” - COUNTRIES • In ”southern” and ”fringe”- Europe areGreece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain and Italy • They have been characterized by having - Lower producitivity and competitiveness,- higher unemployment and lower growth,- large deficits in balance of payment, - large government deficits and debts

  21. INEQUALITITY IN COMPETITIVENESS BETWEEN ”SURPLUS” – AND ”DEFICIT-COUNTRIES HAVE BEEN INCREASING(balance of payment, % of GDP, EU – 12) Source: Central Bank of Denmark and Eurostat

  22. 1.3. THE EURO - PART OF THE PROBLEM ?

  23. BEFORE THE EURO • On onehand it must beadmitted, thatthisinequalitity in competitiveness did exsistbefore the euro • But at that time weakcompetitiveness in the South couldbecompensated • through the currencymarkets, throughexchange rates

  24. THIS COMPENSATION WORKED THROUGH EXCHANGE RATES • Low competitiveness low exchange rate of currency, which on the other side favoured export • High competitiveness strong currency with high exchange rates • which then inhibited export

  25. DEVALUATION • Sometimes weak competitiveness needed stronger compensation • This could be done by devaluation

  26. AFTER THE EURO: • Countries with weak competitiveness • no longer have the possibility of compensating • through exchange rates

  27. AND IN ADDITION: THE EURO ITSELF HAS WEAKENED COMPETITIVENES IN SOUTHERN EUROPE FURTHER • The exchange rate of the Euro has risen as a result of weakening of the american Dollar • And this has led to • a further weakening in competitivenes and exports of southern Europe

  28. THE RESULT: HIGHER LEVEL OF UNEMPLOYMENT IN SOUTHERN EUROPE

  29. HIGHER GOVERNMENT DEFICITSIN SOUTHERN EUROPE

  30. AND A HIGHER AND RISING LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT DEBT IN SOUTHERN EUROPE

  31. THE OTHER SIDE OF DEBT CRISIS IN SOUTHERN EUROPA: GERMANY HAS BENEFITED FROM THE EURO • If Germany still had D-mark, the economic strength and strong export of Germany • would have meant an large appreciation of D-mark (probably between 20 and 30 percent)

  32. WITHOUT THE EURO, A MUCH SMALLER GERMAN EXPORTBOOM • Without the Euro D-mark would have had an exchange rate in the neighbourhood of, • the Schwiss Franc today • Which would have restrainted German exports severely

  33. THE EURO HAS BENEFITED GERMANY AND DAMAGED SOUTHERN EUROPE ECONOMICALLY

  34. GERMANY HAS BENEFITED FROM THE EURO • German exports have prospered from the low exchange rate of the euro • compared to what would have been the case if D –mark had still been around

  35. BUT HASN´T GERMANY IN RETURN CONTRIBUTED MUCH TO RESCUE SOUTHERN EUROPE? • Yes, it s correct • that Germany has been a main contributor to the stabilisation funds • But Germany has gained many times more than this from the euro

  36. German gains and ”losses” from the euro Source: Eurostat and Wikipedia

  37. THE CONCLUSION: THE EURO –AS KNOW IT – IS PART OF THE PROBLEM • The euro did not create the inequalities of com-petitiveness • But the euro has prevented southern Europe from compensating weak competiveness through exchange rates and devaluation • And the rising exchange rate of the euro itself has enhanced this problem of competitiveness in southern Europe

  38. - -

  39. 2 SOLUTIONS AND STRATEGIES FOR THE DEBT CRISIS?

  40. CONTENT • CAN THE PRESENT POLICY OF CUTBACKS ON WELLFARE SOLVE THE CRISIS? • IS EUROEXITA SOLUTION AND WITH WHAT CONSECVENSES? • IS A POLICY OF GROWTH - AND REDESTRIBUTION AN ALTERNATIVE?

  41. 2.1. CAN THE PRESENT POLICY OF CUTBACKS ON WELLFARE AND SALARIES SOLVE THE CRISIS?

  42. POLICY OF GOVERNMENT CUTBACKS • Most governments in the EU • have conducted a policy of cutbacks on government expenditure on wellfare • AND they have also focused on lowering wages and expanding labour output

  43. A NEOLIBERALIST, MONETARIST STRATEGY • This is a strategy based on • a monetarist view of economic policy • And the ”Financial Treaty” reflects this neoliberal economic thinking

  44. PROBLEM • The problem of this strategy is • That the cutbacks further enhances the decline of growth and of employment already caused by the debtcrisis • Thereby the indebted countries get trapped in a combination of low growth and high debt

  45. REAL GDP GROWTH RATE IN SOUTHERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES(2009 – 2012) Source:Eurostat

  46. LARGE FISCAL SURPLUS IS NEEDED • To reduce the present very large government debts • the countries in southern Europe need a large fiscal surplus • through a long period

  47. CUTBACKS WILL KILL GROWTH • If this surplus is to be created only by cutbacks in wealth and wellfare, • it might take 10 years or more, • where economy and wellfare in the meanwhile are brought to a standstill or even shrinks

  48. Dangerous cure • The risc is • that the cure • will kill the patient

  49. GROWTH IS ESSENTIAL • To escape from the combined trap of low growth and high debt • the indebted countries must increase competitiveness

  50. POSSIBLE WAYS • This can be done either 1) By regaining economic-political independence by euroexitor • 2) By economic redistribution from the ”surplus” – countries to southern Europe + by growth policy in the EU

More Related