Fidelity of Tropical Cyclone Intensity and Structure within Reanalyses

1. Fidelity of Tropical Cyclone Intensity and Structure within Reanalyses Benjamin Schenkel and Robert Hart Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science The Florida State University Research Sponsored by NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship and NSF Grant #ATM-0842618

2. Motivation • Significant discrepancies can exist in reanalysis tropical cyclone (TC) position and intensity compared to the best-track

3. Comparison of Reanalysis Detection Efficiencies ERA-40 Detection Frequencies • TC detection frequencies are sensitive to tracking criteria • Detection frequency, by itself, is not good metric for evaluating reanalysis TCs • Need to reconcile differences in detection frequencies by examining TC intensity and structure Taken from Uppala et al. (2004) % ERA-40 and JRA-25 Detection Frequencies 100 80 60 40 20 JRA-25: Black lines ERA-40: Grey lines 0 1979 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 Taken from Onogi et al. (2007)

4. Previous Comparisons of Reanalysis TC Structure JRA-25 WPAC ERA-40 WPAC JRA-25 EPAC ERA-40 EPAC Vertical cross-sections of composited temperature anomalies (Onogi et al. 2007) • Both inter-basin and inter-dataset differences are observed between datasets • Temperature anomalies up to 15°C are observed for major TCs, but coarse resolution yields lower magnitudes for reanalyses

5. Relevant Questions • What type of variability do reanalysis TC intensity and structure display within datasets? Among datasets? • How can differences among reanalyses in TC intensity and structure be physically accounted for? • How does the intensity and structure of reanalysis TCs compare to observations? • What are the deficiencies in the representation of reanalysis TCs? • What are the global climate implications of inadequate reanalysis TC representation?

6. Data and Methods • Data from five reanalyses were used: • NCEP’s CFSR (Saha et al. 2010) • ECMWF’s ERA-40 (Uppala et al. 2005) • ECMWF’s ERA-I (Simmons et al. 2007) • JMA’s JRA-25 (Onogi et al. 2007) • NASA’s MERRA (Bosilovich et al. 2006) • Period from 1979-2001 was chosen for overlap between reanalyses* and satellite era • All TCs within the EPAC, NATL, and WPAC from the best-track (Jarvinen et al. 1984; Neumann et al. 1993; Chu et al. 2002) were included • Analysis utilizes minimum mean sea-level pressure (MSLPMIN), maximum 10 m winds (VMAX10M), and composited anomalies to examine TC intensity and structure * ERA-I only available from 1989-2001

7. Spatial Variability of Position Differences • CFSR and JRA -25 have smallest position differences due to use of supplemental best-track data (e.g. vortex relocation, tropical cyclone wind profile retrievals) • Position difference decreases towards observationally dense areas in NATL/WPAC in ERA-40, ERA-I, and MERRA • EPAC has largest position differences in all reanalyses except JRA-25; intensity is much weaker. Causes of poor representation are not clear. Mean value of position difference at each gridpoint

8. Mean Intensity Differences Between Reanalyses • Coarse resolution of reanalyses precludes replication of intensity • CFSR/JRA-25 have strongest intensities due to use of supplemental best-track data • Increasing reanalysis intensity with increasing best-track intensity category • CFSR has wind-pressure relationship most similar to best-track

9. Cross-Section of NATL Cat 3-5 Temp Anomalies 200 300 Pressure (hPa) 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 200 100 100 200 Radius from TC Center (km) Taken from Hawkins and Rubsam (1968)

10. Concluding Thoughts • Resolution precludes replication of best-track intensity, but large scale structure is consistent with a warm core cyclone. What are implications of not capturing the magnitude of TC intensity? • CFSR and JRA-25 have most robust representation due to use of supplemental data. Are such approaches necessary for future generations of reanalyses? • Relative to NATL and WPAC, substantial issues with TC representation in the EPAC exists. Is this merely an observation density issue?

11. Concluding Thoughts • Potentially non-physical trends in TC intensity and structure exist (e.g. observation density issues, TC age). Relationship between TC age and intensity: • best-track R (age, intensity): 0.57 • reanalysis R (age, intensity): 0.22 to 0.43 • Differences attributable to combination of changing observation density with age, growth in observed TC size, better representation of TCs within reanalyses with time, and dvorak intensity estimates.

12. References Bosilovich, M. et al., 2006: NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA). Geo. Res. Abstracts, 8. Chu, J., C. Sampson, A. Levine, and E. Fukada, 2002: The Joint Typhoon Warning Center Tropical Cyclone Best-Tracks, 1945-2000. Naval Research Laboratory, Reference Number NRL/MR/7540-02-16. Hawkins, H. and D. Rubsam, 1968: Hurricane Hilda, 1964. Mon. Wea. Rev., 96, 617-636. Jarvinen, B., C. Neumann, and M. Davis, 1984: Tropical Cyclone Data Tape for the North Atlantic Basin, 1886-1983: Contents, Limitations and Uses. NOAA Tech. Memorandum NWS NHC 22. Neumann, C., B. Jarvinen, C. McAdie, and J. Elms, 1993: Tropical Cyclones of the North Atlantic Ocean, 1871-1992. National Climatic Data Center in cooperation with the National Hurricane Center, coral Gables, FL, 193 pp. Onogi, K. et al., 2007: The JRA-25 Reanalysis. J. Meteor. Soc.Japan, 85, 369-432. Saha, S. et al., 2010: The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 1015-1057. Simmons, A., S. Uppala, D. Dee, and S. Kobayashi: ERA-Interim: New ECMWF Reanalysis Products from 1989 Onwards. ECMWF Newsletter, 110, 25-35. Uppala, S. et al., 2005: The ERA-40 Reanalysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 2961-3012. Uppala, S. et al., 2004: The ECMWF 45-year reanalysis of the global atmosphere and surface conditions 1957-2002. ECMWF Newsletter, 101, 2-21.

13. Spatial Variability of TC Structure • Lower level thermal wind: positive (red) for warm core cyclones, negative (blue) for cold core cyclones • CFSR displays spatial structure resembling expected mean best-track values • Other reanalyses show magnitude of warm core increasing towards observationally dense areas in NATL/WPAC • EPAC has marginal mean warm core/cold core in ERA-40, ERA-I, and MERRA • Bias towards premature extratropical transition in the NATL and WPAC Mean value of lower level thermal wind for a given gridpoint

14. Data and Methods • Data from five reanalyses was used: • NCEP’s CFSR (Saha et al. 2010) • ECMWF’s ERA-40 (Uppala et al. 2005) • ECMWF’s ERA-I (Simmons et al. 2007) • JMA’s JRA-25 (Onogi et al. 2007) • NASA’s MERRA (Bosilovich et al. 2006) • Period from 1979-2001 was chosen for overlap between reanalyses* and satellite era • All TCs within the EPAC, NATL, and WPAC from the best-track (Jarvinen et al. 1984; Neumann et al. 1993; Chu et al. 2002) were included • Analysis utilizes minimum mean sea-level pressure (MSLPmin), maximum 10 m winds (VMAX10m), cyclone phase space parameters (Hart et al. 2003), and composited anomalies to examine TC intensity and structure * ERA-I only available from 1989-2001