1 / 53

Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis

Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis. Yoram Klein MD. MAGNITUDE OF THE PROBLEM. The disease may be mild and self limiting, 70-80% take course of edematous interstitial inflammation Necrotizing pancreatitis develops in 20-25% pts . 20-30% will develop local or systemic complications

conner
Download Presentation

Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis Yoram Klein MD

  2. MAGNITUDE OF THE PROBLEM • The disease may be mild and self limiting, 70-80% take course of edematous interstitial inflammation • Necrotizing pancreatitis develops in 20-25% pts . • 20-30% will develop local or systemic complications • Approx 1 in 4 pts who develop complications will die

  3. AP & QUESTIONS • WHAT IS THE CORRCT DIAGNOSIS? • What is the prognosis? • Are complications developing? • Can an associated condition to be identified? • What is the ideal timing for surgery?

  4. OBJECTIVE • To give pts of AP best chance of survival, from the outset to be managed by surgeon • Identification of pts likely to develop complications • Management (prevention)of systemic complications • Timing and choice for surgical Intervention for gall stones or local complications

  5. PANCREATITIS (terminology) • MILD-uncomplicated recovery • SEVERE-AP with evidenceoffailure of one or more systems ,or local complication. • These terms are defined retrospectively,when outcome is known • Prospectively defined on the basis of scoring systems.Predicted Mildor Predicted Severe

  6. ACUTE PANCREATITITS-TERMINOLOGY • COMPLICATED-local or systemic complications • EDEMATOUS-Swollen, red ,with or without fat necrosis;Histology fluid,debris,leukocytes present • PERIPANCREATIC NECROSIS-Necrosis of retroperitoneal fat, other organs rarely involved, occasionally infarction by vascular thrombosis.This change may be present alone or may coexist with or be absent in presence of pancreatic necrosis

  7. AP-local complications ……contd • Pancreatic necrosis; • Patchy or diffuse superficial or parenchymal necrosis, unequivocally demonstrated by inspection after opening of the pancreatic capsule , or histological criteria; local or diffuse areas of non enhancement on CT, sterile necrosis • Infected pancreatic necrosis; Necrosis with positive bacterial cultures • Pancreatic abscess;Loculated walled off collections of pus as a late complication of AP, usually after 3 weeks

  8. MANIFESTATIONS OF AP • LOCAL; • MILD; • EDEMA, INFLAMMATION, NECROSIS • SEVERE; • PHLEGMON, NECROSIS, INFECTION, FLUID COLLECTION, ABSCESS

  9. Bacterial contamination • Risk of bacterial infection on necrotic tissue • 60% in proven cases of NP • Risk in ist week =25% • Risk in 2nd week = 35-40% • Risk in 3rd week =60% • Organisms are Gram negative E-coli,Proteus,Pseudomonas,staphylococci

  10. SYSTEMIC COMPLICATIONS • Respiratory-Interstitial pulmonary edema;gas transfer impairment,Pt may need ventilation • Renal-oliguria-require aggressive circulatory support,#Dialysis • Cardiovascular-Hypotension, edema,aggressive fluid therapy and Ionotropes • Haemopoiesis, Coagulation system, Endocrine systems

  11. PANCREATITIS • How to diagnose it? • How to evaluate severity? • RANSON CRITERIA • IMRIES CRITERIA • APACHE scoring • GLASGOW Criteria • Lab and Radiology Help ;

  12. Diagnosis of Pancreatitis • Clinical Diagnosis • Lab studies; • Serum amylase;Levels Rise within 2-12hrs, • 3x times normal is cut off . (n35-118 IU/liter • levels normal in 2-3days. • Persistence of ^ levels >10days denote complication like cyst,abscess. • 5%cases no increase value

  13. Diagnosis of pancreatitis(contd) • Serum lipase ^^ 2x times the normal( 2.3-20.0 IU/L) n=3-5days • CR protein,LDH ,Serum Neutrophil –elastase,IL-6, and alpha macroglobulin • Trypsin like Immunoreactivity

  14. Initial 24 hrs 1.Age >55 years 2.Glucose >than 200 mgm/dl 3.WBC > 16,000 cells/mic L 4.LDH >350 IU/liter 5.AST >250IU/liter Subsequent 48 hrs 1.Art o2tension <60mmHg 2.Bun Increase >8mg/dl 3.Ca < 8mg/dl 4.Base deficit >4meq/liter 5.Estimated fluid sequestration >6liters 6.Fall n Hct >10% RANSON CRITERIA

  15. Mortality prediction (as per Ranson criteria) • A. < 3 signs = 1% • B. Three to Four signs=11% • C. Five to six signs=33% • D. >Six signs= 100%

  16. Temp Mean Art Pressure Heart Rate Resp rate Oxygenation(Pao2) Arterial Ph Serum sodium SerumPottasium Serum creatinine Haematocrit WCC Glasgow coma scale APACHEII

  17. A=+4 to 0 points TEMP>41=4,<29=4 Mean Art Pr>160=4 <49=4 Heart & Resp rateOXYGENATIONART PHSer Na,K,Creat, HCT,WBC GLASGOW COMA Score B=Age <44=0 pts >75=6points C=Chronic Health points H/o organ insufficiency Liver,CVS,Resp,Renal, ,Immunocompromised APACHE SCORE42=90% Mort Apache II score(Sum of A+B+C)

  18. GLASGOW CRITERIA • Any time during First 48hrs after admission • 1.WBC >15000 Cu/mm • 2.Blood glucose>10mmol/l • 3.BUN >16mmol/L • 4.Art po2,< 60mmHg • 5.Ser ca. <2.0 ml/l • 6.Ser Albumin<32gm/l • 7.Ser LDH >600u/L(n=250) • 8.AST Or ALT >200u/l

  19. Any time during First 48hrs after admission; WBC >15000 Cu/mm Blood glucose>10mmol/l BUN >16mmol/L Art po2,< 60mmHg Ser ca. <2.0 ml/l Ser Albumin<32gm/l Ser LDH >600u/L(n=250) AST Or ALT >200u/l GLASGOW CRITERIA

  20. Comparsion Of Scales

  21. INTERSTITIAL AND NECROTIZING PANCREATITIS (Discrimination) • Markers of Necroses • C-reactive protein>120 mgm/L • PMN-Elastase>120mgm/L • PLA>15U/L • PLA2>3.5U/L • Dynamic angio –CT • Guided needle aspiration of necroses for detection of bacteria

  22. RADIOLOGY • Plain Films • Ultrasonography • Sens;62-95%,Specif>95%, pancreas not visualized in> 40%pts • CT scan;Sens 90% Specif+100% • ERCP • PTC. Pancreatitis is due to gallstone? Or Alcoholic?

  23. Enlargement of Gland Ill defined margins Abnormal enhancement Thickening of peripancreatic planes Blurring of fat planes Intra & retroperitoneal fluid collection Pleural effusion Pancreatic gas indicative of necrosis /abscess Pseudocyst formation CT findings in Acute Pancreatitis

  24. ERCP; Indications In AP • Preop evaluation with suspected traumatic pancreatitis to see Pancreatic duct disruption • Pts with suspected biliary Pancreatitis and severe disease and not clinically improving by 24hrs after admission. Do ERCP for stone extraction

  25. ERCP-indications (contd • In pts >40 with no identifiable disease to rule out occult CBD stones,pancreatic or ampullary Ca or other causes of obstruction; • Pts <40 at a post Cholecystectomy status or more than one attacks of unexplained pancreatitis

  26. SYSTEMIC TREATMENTS • Basic principles-ICU,Rest GIT and Pancreas,analgesia,oxygenation • Pancreatic inhibition (Glucagon, Somatostatin)? • Antibiotics • Nutrition (Enteral route is safe& preferred )

  27. Role of Antibiotics in AP • Traditional teaching Prophylactic antibiotics do not prevent abscess- • Mezlocillin, Metrionidazole, Imipnem good concentration in pancreatic juice • Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime Clindamycin, Ciprofloacin good levels in p. juice • They can limit rate of infection of this necr material(Bossi1992)

  28. Operative Measures For AP • A.Diagnostic laparotomy • B.To limit the severity of pancreatic inflammation • Biliary operations • C.To interrupt the pathogenesis of complications • Pancreatic drainage • Pancreatic resection • Peritoneal drainage

  29. Operative measures(contg) • D.To support the patient and treat complications • Drainage of pancreatic abscesses • Feeding jejunostomy • To prevent recurrent pancreatitis

  30. Diagnostic uncertainty Gall stone induced pancreatitis Pancreatic drainage and defunctioning Pancreatic resection Peritoneal Lavage Operation for complications Surgical treatment-indications

  31. Bile duct stones-strategy • Acosta (1974), recovered gall stones from Faeces of pts with gall stone pancreatitis. • Neptolemos (1989) ;Passage of stone through ampulla precipitates pancreatitis attack, persistence of stones in CBD; Pt is at risk of complications and death • Early surgery or to deal with CBD stones endoscopically (ERCP) 14 %pts of AP have coexisting cholangitis

  32. Timing OF Operation IN Gall Stone Pancreatitis • Mild pancreatitis:Operated At Any Stage during first admission • Severe disease.Cholecystectomy during first admission, timing depends on clinical indicators

  33. Timing of Surgery-contd • RECOVERING PT.Allow pt to settle completely before elective early operation is taken prior to discharge. • UNSTABLE PT- Who will require surgery to deal with local complications of pancreas, Cholecystectomy to be performed at this time • Early Cholecystectomy within 48-72 hours of admission is best avoided in these all patients

  34. Clinical criteria Surgical acute abdomen Sepsis syndrome Shock syndrome Non response to ICU Morphologic +Bacteriologic Infected necroses Extended pancreatic necrosis>50% Extnd. intrapancreatic +retroperitoneal necroses Indications of Operation IN NP

  35. Technique of Debridement • Closed cavity Lavage • Open abdomen • Surgical drainage • Posterior approach • Pancreatic resection

More Related