1 / 16

Promoting flexicurity in France: a gender perspective

Anne Eydoux, CRESS-Lessor, Rennes 2 University & Center for employment studies Second ASPEN/ETUI-REHS conference - Activation and security March 20-21 2009, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Promoting flexicurity in France: a gender perspective. Introduction.

conner
Download Presentation

Promoting flexicurity in France: a gender perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Anne Eydoux, CRESS-Lessor, Rennes 2 University & Center for employment studies Second ASPEN/ETUI-REHS conference - Activation and security March 20-21 2009, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic Promoting flexicurity in France: a gender perspective

  2. Introduction

  3. Recent propositions about flexicurity in France hardly mention the issue of gender equality • This paper aims at questioning these propositions in a gender perspective • How are entitlements to social rights defined ? • On what principles of justice ? • How is gender taken into account in recent propositions for flexicurity in France ? • Transitional labour markets, « droits de tirages sociaux » Flexicurity, social rights and gender

  4. 1. Social rights and gender equality: real versus formal equality • 2. The French social right regime and the male-breadwinner model • 3. Social rights in France, new risks and current challenges Plan

  5. Defining social rights and questioning their links to gender equality is crucial • Several ways to promote gender equality • Formal (procedural) equality differs from real (substantive) equality 1. Social rights and gender equality: real versus formal equality

  6. Four entitlements principles (Sainsbury 1996)‏ • Family maintenance (rights for family providers and dependants)‏ • Care activities (rights for carers)‏ • Labour market participation (rights for workers)‏ • Citizenship (nationality or residence criteria)‏ • Different emancipatory or regulatory potential for women Access to social rights in a gender perspective

  7. Lawyers distinguish (Borgetto 1999)‏ • Formal equality (equal treatment)‏ • Real equality (reducing existing inequalities)‏ • The example of the “free choice allowance (APE / PAJE-CLCA) illustrates it • Allowance for caring fathers or mothers (formal eq.)‏ • Only 2,5% of the recipients are fathers • This allowance reflects inequalities • Gendered social and family roles • Labour market segmentation (gendered and among women themselves)‏ “Real” versus “formal” equality

  8. How to define social rights that favour real equality ? • Sen's approach (1990)‏ is interesting • Links gender inequalities to the differentiation of social and family roles • Invite to attach social rights to the individuals rather than to the household • Family decision and bargaining processes do not reflect “free choice” but social norms and constraints • Increasing women's capabilities goes through the economic action of women (participation to employment) Equality and capabilities

  9. Social rights regimes more or less favour gender equality in Europe • Comparative researches distinguish • The social-democratic/individual model • The conservative/male-breadwinner model • The French regime still reinforces existing gender relations 2. The French social right regime and the male-breadwinner model

  10. Northern countries, in particular Danemark • Universal social rights linked to citizenship • Generous system relying on high employment rates • Individual responsibility and public solidarities • Individual rights (dual-breadwinner model)‏ • Individual rights (rather than deriving from the status of dependent)‏ • Individualised/Separate taxation system • De-commodification and de-familialisation • Formal equality and real equality The social-democratic regime: individualized rights and activation

  11. Continental countries (France, Germany)‏ • Social rights based on employment & family • Rights for dependants (widow pensions, etc.)‏ • Rights for carers (“free choice” allowance)‏ • Rights for citizens/residents (Minimum integration income, RMI)‏ • Promoting both work and family solidarities • Ambiguous family policy • Social rights & taxation favour “households equity”, not gender equality and women's employment • Equality: formal rather than real France: the male-breadwinner model reinforces inequalities

  12. In terms of gender equality, the French social rights regime appears imbalanced • The transformation of employment and family • that found social rights • make it vulnerable 3. Promoting income and job security in France: new risks and new challenges

  13. Slow erosion of social rights based on employment • Rights based on citizenship have developed (RMI)‏ • But activation measures are insufficient • Social rights based on the family still promote the “free choice” principle (family choice)‏ • It does not correspond to family transformations • and exposes some women/families to poverty • Social rights hardly secure professional transitions New risks : family breaks and professional discontinuities

  14. These difficulties constitute a challenge for public employment and social policies • Several propositions defend a French flexicurity • « droits de tirage sociaux »/ rights to training periods for workers (Supiot 1999)‏ • Individual right to training, DIF, 2004 • « transitional labour markets » (Schmid 1995, Gazier 2007)‏ • Pb: the design of the free choice allowance (CLCA)‏ • The risk is to reproduce gender inequalities • For professional and training entitlements as well as for caring entitlements Reshaping social rights: the risk to reproduce gender inequalities

  15. Conclusion

  16. The promotion of flexicurity in a gender perspective still faces to challenges in France • Social rights linked to the household/family • Existing “free choice” and “households equity” principles in the name of family solidarities • The framing of social rights is crucial • Individualised rights • Rights to care services • Reshaping transitions to favour gender equality • Parental leaves • remuneration linked to wages • father's quota Promoting flexicurity and gender equality in France

More Related