1 / 42

Ultracold Quantum Gases

Collège de France. Ultracold Quantum Gases. Claude Cohen-Tannoudji. NCKU, 23 March 2009. Evolution of Atomic Physics.

cooper-beard
Download Presentation

Ultracold Quantum Gases

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Collège de France Ultracold Quantum Gases Claude Cohen-Tannoudji NCKU, 23 March 2009

  2. Evolution of Atomic Physics Characterized by spectacular advances in our ability to manipulate the various degrees of freedom of an atom-Spin polarization (optical pumping) - Velocity (laser cooling, evaporative cooling) - Position (trapping) - Atom-Atom interactions (Feshbach resonances) Purpose of this lecture 1 – Briefly describe the basic methods used for producing and manipulating ultracold atoms and molecules 2 - Review a few examples showing how ultracold atoms are allowing one to  perform new more refined tests of basic physical laws  achieve new situations where all parameters can be carefully controlled, providing in this way simple models for understanding more complex problems in other fields.

  3. PRODUCING AND MANIPULATINGULTRACOLD ATOMS AND MOLECULES • Radiative forces • Cooling • Trapping • Feshbach resonances

  4. p p p p p p C p p Sun Forces exerted by light on atoms A simple example Target C bombarded by projectiles p coming all along the same direction As a result of the transfer of momentum from the projectiles to the target C, the target C is pushed Atom in a light beam Analogous situation, the incomingphotons, scattered by the atom C playing the role of the projectiles p Explanation of the tail of the comets In a resonant laser beam, the radiation pressure force can be very large

  5. J. Prodan W. Phillips H. Metcalf Laser beam Atomic beam Tapered solenoid Zeeman slower Atom in a resonant laser beam Fluorescence cycles (absorption + spontaneous emission) lasting a time t (radiative lifetime of the excited state) of the order of 10-8 s Mean number of fluorescence cycles per sec : W ~ 1/ t ~ 108 sec-1 In each cycle, the mean velocity change of the atom is equal to: dv = vrec = hn/Mc  10-2 m/s Mean acceleration a (or deceleration) of the atom a = velocity change /sec = velocity change dv / cycle x number of cycles / sec W = vrec x (1 / tR)= 10-2 x 108 m/s2 = 106 m/s2 = 105 g Huge radiation pressure force! Stopping an atomic beam

  6. nL < nA nL < nA v Laser Doppler cooling T. Hansch, A. Schawlow, D. Wineland, H. DehmeltTheory : V. Letokhov, V. Minogin, D. Wineland, W. Itano 2 counterpropagating laser beams Same intensity Same frequency nL (nL < nA) Atom at rest (v=0) The two radiation pressure forces cancel each other out Atom moving with a velocity v Because of the Doppler effect, the counterpropagating wave gets closer to resonance and exerts a strongerforce than the copropagating wave which gets farther Net force opposite to v and proportional to v for v small Friction force “Optical molasses”

  7. J. DalibardC. Cohen-Tannoudji “Sisyphus” cooling Several ground state sublevels Spin down Spin up In a laser standing wave, spatial modulation of the laser intensity and of the laser polarization • Spatially modulated light shifts of g and g due to the laser light • Correlated spatial modulations of optical pumping rates g ↔ g The moving atom is always running up potential hills (like Sisyphus)!Very efficient cooling scheme leading to temperatures in the mK range

  8. E4 E2 E1 U0 E3 Evaporative cooling H. Hess, J.M. Doyle MIT After the collision, the 2 atoms have energiesE3 et E4, with E1+ E2= E3+ E4 If E4 > U0, the atom with energy E4 leaves the well Atoms trapped in a potential well with a finite depth U0 The remaining atom has amuch lower energy E3.After rethermalization of the atoms remaining trapped,the temperature decreases 2 atoms with energiesE1 et E2 undergo an elastic collision

  9. Temperature scale (in Kelvin units) cosmic microwave background radiation (remnant of the big bang) The coldest matter in the universe

  10. Traps for neutral atoms “Optical Tweezers” A. Ashkin, S. Chu Spatial gradients of laser intensity Focused laser beam. Red detuning (wL < wA) The light shift dEg of the ground state g is negative and reaches its largest value at the focus. Attractive potential well in which neutral atoms can be trapped if they are slow enough “Optical lattice” Spatially periodic array of potential wells associated with the light shifts of a detuned laser standing wave Other types of traps using magnetic field gradients combined with the radiation pressure of properly polarized laser beams (“Magneto Optical Traps”)

  11. - Possibility to switch off suddenly the optical potential - Possibility to vary the depth of the periodic potential well by changing the laser intensity - Possibility to change the spatial period of the potential by changing the angle between the 2 running laser waves - Possibility to change the frequency of one of the 2 waves and to obtain a moving standing wave - Possibility to change the dimensionality (1D, 2D, 3D) and the symmetry (triangular lattice, cubic lattice) Optical lattices The dynamics of an atom in a periodic optical potential, called“optical lattice”, shares many features with the dynamics of an electron in a crystal. But it also offers new possibilities! New possibilities offered by optical lattices They can be easily manipulated, much more than the periodicpotential inside a crystal Furthermore, possibility to control atom-atom interactions, both in magnitude and sign, by using “Feshbach resonances”

  12. V Closed channel E 0 r Open channel Feshbach Resonances The 2 atoms collide with a very small positive energy E in a channel which is called “open” The energy of the dissociation threshold of the open channel is taken as the zero of energy There is another channel above the open channel where scattering states with energy E cannot exist because E is below the dissociation threshold of this channel which is called “closed” Ebound There is a bound state in the closed channel whose energy Ebound is close to the collision energy E in the open channel

  13. Physical mechanism of the Feshbach resonance The incoming state with energy E of the 2 colliding atoms in the open channel is coupled by the interaction to the bound state bound in the closed channel. The pair of colliding atoms can make a virtual transition to the bound state and come back to the colliding state. The duration of this virtual transition scales as ħ / I Ebound-E I, i.e. as the inverse of the detuning between the collision energy E and the energy Ebound of the bound state. When E is close to Ebound, the virtual transition can last a very long time and this enhances the scattering amplitude Analogy with resonant light scattering when an impinging photon of energy hn can be absorbed by an atom which is brought to an excited discrete state with an energy hn0 above the initial atomic state and then reemitted. There is a resonance in the scattering amplitude when n is close to n0

  14. V Closed channel E 0 r Open channel Sweeping the Feshbach resonance The total magnetic moment of the atoms are not the same in the 2 channels (different spin configurations). The energy difference between the them can be varied by sweeping a magnetic field

  15. Scattering length versus magnetic field a a > 0Repulsive effective long range interactions a = 0No interactionsPerfect gas B abg Backgroundscattering length Near B=B0, IaI is very largeStrong interactions Strong correlations a < 0Attractive effective long range interactions B0 : value of B for which the energy of the bound state, in the closed channel (shifted by its interaction with the continuum of collision states in the open channel) coincides with the energy E~0 of the colliding pair of atoms First observation for cold Na atoms: MIT Nature, 392, 151 (1998)

  16. Bound state of the two-channel Hamiltonian In the region a » range r0 of atom–atom interactions a =  Eb a > 0Bound state with an energyEb= - ħ2/ ma2  - (B – B0)2 a < 0No bound state B The bound state exists only in the region a > 0. It has a spatial extension a and an energyEb= - ħ2/ ma2 Weakly bound dimer with universal properties Quantum “halo” state or “Feshbach molecule” 16

  17. Formation of a Fehbach molecule Eb a > 0Bound state with an energyEb= - ħ2 / ma2  - B2 a < 0No bound state B If B0 is swept through the Feshbach resonance from the region a < 0 to the region a > 0, a pair of colliding ultracold atoms can be transformed into a Feshbach molecule Another interesting system: Efimov trimers (R. Grimm) 17

  18. One-photon PA Two-photon PA E A+A* A+A r Another method for producing ultracold Molecules Gluing 2 ultracold atoms with one or two-photonphotoassociation Recent results obtained in Paris on the PA of two metastable helium atomswith a high internal energy Giant dimmers produced by one-photon PA Distance between the 2 atoms larger than 50 nmNeed to include retardation effects in the Van der Waals interactions for explaining the vibrational spectrum Molecules of metastable He produced by two-photon PA Measurement of the binding energy of the least bound state and determination of the scattering length of 2 metastable He atoms with an accuracy more than 100 larger than all prevous measurements

  19. TESTING FUNDAMENTAL LAWSWITH ULTRACOLD ATOMS Ultraprecise Atomic Clocks

  20. Atomic transition Correction Interrogation Oscillator w0 Measuring time with atomic clocks Principle of an atomic clock The correction loop locks thefrequency of the oscillator tothe frequency wA of the hyperfine transition of 133Cs used for definingthe second The narrower the atomic line,i.e. the smaller Dw , the better the locking of the frequency of the oscillator to wA. D w  1 / TT : Observation time It is therefore interesting to use slow atoms in order to increase T, and thus to decrease D w

  21. ℓ Cs atomic beamv  100 m/s ℓ L  0.5 m H Improving atomic clocks with ultracold atoms Usual clocks using thermal Cs atoms Appearance in the resonance of Ramsey fringes having a width determined by the time T = L / v  0.005 s Fountains of ultracold atoms Throwing a cloud of ultracold atoms upwards with a laser pulse to have them crossing the same cavity twice, once in the way up, once in the way down, and obtaining in this way 2 interactions separated by a time interval T H = 30 cm  T = 0.5 s Improvement by a factor 100!

  22. ChristopheSalomon AndréClairon Examples of atomic fountains - Sodium fountains : Stanford S. Chu- Cesium fountains : BNM/SYRTE C. Salomon, A. Clairon Stability : 1.6 x 10-16 for an integration time 5 x 104 s Accuracy : 3 x 10-16 A stability of 10-16 corresponds to an error smaller than 1 second in 300 millions years

  23. From terrestrial clocks to space clocks Working in microgravity in order to avoid the fall of atoms.One can then launch them through 2 cavities with a very small velocity without having them falling Parabolic flights (PHARAO project)

  24. Sensitivity gains • Thermal beam : • v = 100 m/s, T = 5 ms • Dn = 100 Hz • Fountain : • v = 4 m/s, T = 0.5 s • Dn = 1 Hz • PHARAO : • v = 0.05 m/s, T = 5 s • Dn = 0.1 Hz

  25. cnesesa ACES on the space station • Time reference • Validation of spatial clocks • Fundamental tests C. Salomon et al , C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, t.2, Série IV, p. 1313-1330 (2001)

  26. Gravitational shiftof the frequency of a clock An observer at an altitude z receives the signal of a clock located at the altitude z+dz and measures a frequency wA(z+dz) different from the frequency, wA(z), of his own clock 2 clocks at altitudes differing by 1 meter have apparent frequencies which differ in relative value by 10-16.A space clock at an altitude of 400 kms differs from a terrestrial clock by 4 x 10-11 . Possibility to check this effect with a precision 25 times better than all previous tests Another possible application : determination of the “geoid”, surface where the gravitational potential has a given value

  27. Optical clocks Combs Relative accuracy Redefinition of the second Cs Clocks Atomic fountains Year

  28. Recent results obtained by the NIST-Boulder group Single ion optical clocks with Al+ and Hg+ Tests of a possible variation of fundamental constants Science, 319, 1808 (2008)

  29. FROM ULTRACOLD ATOMSTO MORE COMPLEX SYSTEMS Bose Einstein condensates Phase transitions involving bosonic atoms or molecules- Superfluid Mott-insulator transition - BEC – BCS crossover. From a molecular BEC to a BCS superfluid of Cooper type pairs of fermionic atoms - Berezinski-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition for a two-dimensional Bose gas Fermionic atoms in an optical lattice - “Metal” Mott-insulator transition - Towards antiferromagnetic structures Ultracold atoms as “quantum simulators”

  30. Bose Einstein condensates When T decreases, the de Broglie wavelength increases and the size of the atomic wave packets increases When they overlap all atoms condense in the ground state of the trap which contains themThey form a macroscopic matter wave All atoms are in the same quantum state and evolve in phase like soldiers marching in loskstep These gaseous condensates, discovered in 1995, are macroscopic quantum systems having properties (superfluidity, coherence) which make them similar to other systems only found up to now in dense systems (liquid helium , superconductors)

  31. Experimental observation MIT 23Na 1995 JILA 87Rb 1995 Many others atoms have been condensed7Li, 1H, 4He*, 41K, 133Cs, 174Yb, 52Cr…

  32. Interferencesbetween 2 condensates Coherent beam of atomic de Broglie waves extracted from a condensate MIT Munich Examples of quantum propertiesof macroscopic matter waves of bosonic atoms Coherence Atom lasers Superfluidity ENS MIT Lattice of quantized vortices in a superconductor Lattice of quantized vortices in a condensate

  33. a b a BEC in a periodic optical potential Superfluid – Mott insulator transition a b a – Small depth of the wells. Delocalized matter waves. Superfluid phase b - Large depth of the wells. Localized waves. Insulator phase I. Bloch groupin MunichNature,415, 39 (2002) Realization of the Bose Hubbard Hamiltonian

  34. a<0 a= a>0 BEC-BCS crossover observed with ultracold fermions By varying the magnetic field around a Feshbach resonance,one can explore 3 regions - Region a>0 (strong interactions). There is a bound state in the interaction potential where 2 fermions with different spin states can form molecules which can condense in a molecular BEC - Region a<0 (weak interactions). No molecular state, but long range attractive interactions giving rise to weakly bound Cooper pairs which can condense in a BCS superfluid phase - Region a= (Very strong interactions) Strongly correlated systems with universal properties. Recent observation at MIT(W. Ketterle et al) of quantizedvortices in all these 3 zonesdemonstrating the superfluidcharacter of the 3 phasesScience, 435, 1047 (2005)

  35. 0 0 0 BKT crossover in a trapped 2D atomic gas J. Dalibard group, ENS, Paris, Nature, 441,1053 (2006) How to prepare the 2D gas How to detect phase coherence Interference fringes changing at high T (lower contrast, waviness)Quasi-long-range order (vortex-antivortex pairs) lost at high T Detection of the appearance of free vortices Onset of sharp dislocations in the interference pattern coinciding with the loss of long-range order Conclusion : the BKT crossover is due to the unbinding ofvortex-antivortex pairs with the appearance of free vortices

  36. - Mixture in equal proportions of fermionic atoms in 2 different states in an optical lattice Spin down: Spin up: Fermionic Mott insulator - Adding an external harmonic confinement pushing the atoms towards the center of the lattice - How are the atoms moving in the lattice when their interactions, the lattice depth, the external confinement are varied • Competition between■ Pauli exclusion priciple preventing 2 atoms in the same spin state to occupy the same lattice site ■ Interactions between atoms in different spin states. If they are repulsive, the 2 atoms don’t like to be in the same site ■ External confinement Realization of the Fermi Hubbard Hamiltonian Two recent experiments : Zurich (ETH) Nature 455, 204 (2008) Mainz Science 322, 1520 (2008)

  37. Compression Band insulator Compression Compressible “metal” Mott insulator Cloud size(compressibility) MI BI w2N 2/3 Non interacting fermions (single band model) Compressible “metal” Repulsive interactions

  38. Realizing an interaction or ? Antiferromagnetic order in a square lattice Triangular lattice Towards antiferromagnetic structures - Atoms with a large magnetic dipole (Cr)- Heteropolar molecules in the ground state- Super-exchange (Pauli principle + on site interactions) Need of a very low temperature (kBT « a) Frustration

  39. ConclusionUsing ultracold atoms as quantum simulators Quantum simulator: experimental system whose behavior reproduces as close as possible a certain class of model Hamiltonians. Feynman’s idea Requirements for a “quantum simulator” • Tailoring the potential in which particles are moving • Controlling the interactions between particles • Controlling the temperature, the density • Ability to measure various properties of the system Possibilities offered by ultracold atomic gases • Very flexible optical potentials, with all dimensionalities, with all possible shapes (periodic, single well,…) • Tuning the interactions with Feshbach resonances • Various cooling schemes and measurement methods Hope to answer in this way questions unreachable for classicalcomputers because of memory, speed and size limitations

  40. 41

  41. 42

More Related