1 / 21

New Zealand HRD practitioner competencies: application of the ASTD competency model

New Zealand HRD practitioner competencies: application of the ASTD competency model. 人力資源發展研討 (1) , 3/7 Model vs. practice. APA style. 遵守你的指導教授要求的格式寫 reference. 遵守要投稿的期刊規定 APA style, AMJ style

cree
Download Presentation

New Zealand HRD practitioner competencies: application of the ASTD competency model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. New Zealand HRD practitioner competencies: application of the ASTD competency model 人力資源發展研討 (1),3/7 Model vs. practice

  2. APA style • 遵守你的指導教授要求的格式寫reference. • 遵守要投稿的期刊規定 • APA style, AMJ style • Gray, L. (1999). New Zealand HRD practitioner competencies: application of the ASTD competency model. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(6), 1046-1059.(SSCI)

  3. Introduction • Problems in New Zealand’s HRD professionals: • the competence of HRD practitioners has been a concern. • Establish standard • Shortage of professional

  4. Introduction • Established certification programs by 2 institutions • IPMNZ- Institute of Personnel Management New Zealand • NZATD- New Zealand Association for Training and Development • No national recognition • For example- the IPD (Institue of Personnel and Development) in UK established standards and qulailty check.

  5. Definition • After reviewing 337 citations, the competence was defined as: • Page and Wilson(1994) • “the skills, abilities, and personal characteristics required by an effective or good manager”. • 將職能定義為「一個好的經理人所要求的技能、能力及個人特質。」

  6. Definition • Boyatizs(1982) • An underlying characteristic of a person which results in effective and/or superior performance in a job. • 認為「職能是指一個人所具備的潛在特質,而這些潛在特質是導致及影響個人在工作上能有傑出表現的原因。」 • An underlying characteristic • Include a motive, trait, skill, an aspect of one’s self image or social role, or a body of knowledge. • 動機、特性、自我概念、知識及技能。

  7. Definition • 延續Boyatizs, Spencer及Spencer(1993)defined competence as : “underlying characteristic of an individual that is causally related to criterion referenced effective and/or superior performance ina job or situation”. • 強調 competence 與 performance 要相關,如此才使是practical implications for HRM. • Eg. Motive: strong desire for money, not necessary related to job success.

  8. Definition • Seligman’s example of selecting for key personal competencies (1991) • Superior insurance sales vs. poor sales • Personal characteristic of optimism. • 易將挫折合理化 • 傳統選才基於專業保險知識 • Metropolitan Life (美商大都會人壽) 有 50% turnover. • 改用 competence 選才,turnover降到 20% • (min. require for industry-knowledge)

  9. Definition • Moy (1991) examined 10 HRD competency studies (1976-1989) • 8 studies focused on what HRD actually do; McLagan (1983, 1989) prescribe current and future practice. • Boam and Sparrow’s (1992) review managerial competency • 以上研究都較著重interpersonal/personal competencies, 呼應了Spencer & Spencer的理論。

  10. AIM 目的 • To examine the relevance of the model to New Zealand HRD practice • To see exactly what types of competencies employers were seeking from HRD practitioners. • Model used: ASTD 1987 model. • 記得補充 ASTD 發展回顧 • 選用求職廣告中雇主刊登之職能來檢驗文獻中之發現。

  11. Method Data collection: • HRM job advertisements from 3 newspapers (Wednesday and Saturday in 1996). • Source: secondary data: microfilms from library • Coding: 用Moy (1991) and McLagan (1989) 發展之HRD categories • 587 HRM job advertisements • (Moy (1991) and McLagan (1989) 的文獻為本文作者主要之 theoretical frameworks)

  12. Results • 200 HRD jobs (34%) from 587 HRM jobs. • Indicated 在NZ, HRD佔不少比例 • 1113 comp. (平均每個工作needs 6 comp.) 分屬於5個職能群 (see Table 8) • Technical, business, interpersonal, intellectual and personal

  13. Results-technical skills • Table 2可看出HRD 求才廣告仍主訴technical competency (36%) • technical competency中最常需要的comp.為 • SME • Needs analysis • Presentation skills

  14. Results-Interpersonal skills • 對Interpersonal skills 之需求佔第二 (26%) • 其中training adminisrators所需Interpersonal skills 比 HRD manager 高 • Team-player (17%)未出現在McLagan的文獻中,但出現在MOY的文獻中。 • Relationship building (19%) • (檢視自己的Data有無interesting, controversial之結果報告並解釋之)

  15. Results-personal competencies • McLagan’s (1989) model omits personal competencies. • Similar to Redman and Mathews (1997)’s study

  16. Results-business skills • Business competencies have management, economics, and administration base. • 5 out of 9 comp. in McLagan’s were identified. • Project management

  17. Results-Intellectual skills • The least demanded in job ad. • The job ad is not seen as an appropriate place to request such competencies.

  18. Conclusions and implications • ASTD model should be the important tool for HRD practitioners to develop themselves, but it failed to provide one important comp.=>personal • Employer job ad must be viewed with some caution => no thorough analysis • Job ad with personal com. Is more effective than traditional ad. • Selecting for personal com. is much simpler than trying to develop them.

  19. Conclusions and implications • The ASTD model neglects personal competencies that employers and the literature suggest are crucial to success as a practitioner • The prevalence of technical skills in job advertisements is logical given their ability to discriminate quickly between possible applicants • There is a need to investigate whether competencies in general, and personal competencies in particular, are related to any thorough competency analysis of the job in question. • Given the significance of personal competencies, employers need to be aware that selecting for personal competencies is more important than trying to develop them in practitioners. 結論是否從發現中衍生出?

  20. Comments • 用很簡單的方法探討有意涵的問題研究,結果對學術界實務界皆有意義,值得學習。 • 為何選擇 ASTD 1987 Model? • 美國model 在NZ代表性(外部效度)? • Data collection來源太單一 • See Table 1: 沒有entry level position (eg.: assistant) • 宜增加哪些資料收集管道? • Method未解釋清楚 • 何謂 HRM job • 多少人做coding? 如何避免coder bias?

  21. Selection for Knowledge-based competences or Personal competences What are the pros or cons?

More Related