1 / 23

Status and future perspectives on V cs and V cd

This talk focuses on the unitary test on the second row and measurements of Vcs and Vcd using experimental methods and theoretical tools like Lattice QCD and QCD Sum Rules.

cshryock
Download Presentation

Status and future perspectives on V cs and V cd

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status and future perspectives on Vcs and Vcd Marina Artuso Syracuse University Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  2. Motivation: unitarity constraints    weak VCKM mass Wolfenstein eigenstates eigenstates parameterization To l3 in real part & l5 in im. part • CKM unitary  described by 4 parameters (3 real, 1 imaginary: e.g. A,l,r,h), but each quark mixing is in principle measurable  highly constrained system • This talk focuses on unitary test on the second row Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  3. Received a lot of attention in recent years because of developments in lattice QCD (see R. Van de Water presentation) Pseudoscalar hadronic final states preferred because they are stable to strong decay  e+ W+ Vcs and Vcd from charm semileptonic decays In D rest frame Squared 4-momentum transfer Vcq K,p D • We measure: Theory input Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  4. Two approaches • Assuming Vcs and Vcd known (Stone’s talk) • DK(K*)ln , Dpln determine form factor shapes & distinguish among models + test lattice QCD predictions (see S. Stone talk, WG2/3 joint session) • Note that lattice checks comparing semileptonic ff & fD can be done independently of knowledge of CKM parameters • Assuming lattice predictions OK (this talk) • measurements of Vcd & Vcs Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  5. Experimental methods • DD production at threshold: used by Mark III, and more recently by CLEO-c and BES-II. • Unique event properties • Only DD not DDx produced • Large cross sections: s(DoDo) = 3.720.09 nb s(D+D-) = 2.820.09 nb • Ease of B measurements using "double tags“ • B-factories (e+e-) + fixed target & collider experiments at hadron machines • D displaced vertex • D*+ p+D0 tag World Ave Continuum ~14.5 nb p K (ps) D0 e+ e- Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  6. Theoretical Tools • Lattice QCD • Theory (unquenched QCD), still has moderate systematic errors; however theoretical accuracy can be improved in a controlled fashion. • QCD Sum Rules • Equating phenomenological and theoretical spectral functions; • Determination of theoretical spectral functions by calculating two or three-point correlators in perturbative QCD, including corrections from the OPE Many parameters, difficult to improve their accuracy in a systematic fashion. • Phenomenological models • Important contributions to our understanding of charm decays • No way to improve these predictions in any systematic way Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  7. Lattice results for DK(p) e ne semileptonic decays • two form factors are needed to describe the vector current matrix element <P|Vm|D> : f+(q2) and f0(q2), (only f+(q2) needed if ml negligible) • Lattice QCD calculates both f+ and f0, since they can be fit simultaneously imposing the constraint f+(0)= f0(0) • Fermilab-MILC-HPQCD reported results using 2+1 flavors of improved staggered quark to implement non-quenched f.f. calculation • Dominant systematic error from heavy quark discretization (7% of the overall 10% uncertainty) Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  8. A snapshot of theoretical predictions • Other predictions are available from quenched lattice QCD calculations, QCD sum rules and form factor models Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  9. K- K+ - e+ CLEO-c results – tagged analysis 281 pb-1310K D+ 160K D0 Signal events: U = Emiss– |Pmiss| = 0 Tag allows to determine signal D0 momentum Signal semileptonic decay Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  10. CLEO-c results untagged analysis • Unspecified other side D decay, collect other showers and tracks • Use neutrino reconstruction like Bp/rln • Higher statistical accuracy, worse systematic error • Samples overlap Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  11. D K, pen Branching Fractions D → K e+ ν D → π e+ ν FNAL-MILC-HPQCD FNAL-MILC-HPQCD preliminary preliminary preliminary preliminary FNAL-MILC-HPQCD precision lags experiment. Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  12. Hill & Becher, Phys. Lett. B 633, 61 (2006) Form-Factor Parameterizations • In general • Modified Pole • Series Expansion Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  13. Form factor data and FNAL-MILC-HPQCD predictions CLEO-c preliminary-tagged • FNAL-MILC-HPQCD calculation uses modified pole model to fit for form factor from “measured”points [PRL 94, 011601 (2005)] • FF predictions: • DKen f+(0)=0.73±0.03±0.07 • a=0.50±0.04±0.07 • Dpen f+(0)=0.64±0.03±0.06 • a=0.44±0.04±0.07 Fnal-MILC-HPQCD Fnal-MILC-HPQCD Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  14. BELLE: PRL 97, 061804 (2006) [hep-ex/0604049]BaBar: hep-ex/0607077FOCUS: PLB607, 233 (2005) [hep-ex/0410037] Belle,BaBar,FOCUS D  K,pℓn form factorsdata Belle, 282fb-1, fully reconstructed events, excellent q2 resolution Aubin et al., PRL94, 011601 (2005)Abada et al., NuclPhys B619, 565 (2001) Unquenched LQCDQuenched LQCDSimple pole model Belle + FOCUS published Kℓn ~2.5k signal events Kℓn Belle FOCUS: ~13k events 75fb-1 FNAL MILC HPQCD: Aubin et al., PRL94, 011601(2005) pℓn 232 signal events q2 (GeV2) Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  15. Belle . . Belle Summary of lattice-experiment comparison D0 K-e+ne Assuming Vcs=0.9745 D0 p-e+ne Assuming Vcd=0.2238 FNAL.MILC-HPQCD FNAL.MILC-HPQCD Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  16. Using semileptonic width and form factors • Using the preliminary CLEO-c semileptonic widths G(DKene) =(8.70.16) x10-2 ps-1 and G(Dpene)= (0.76 0.03)x10-2 ps-1 and FNAL-MILC-HRQCD G(DKene)/|Vcs|2 and G(Dpene)/|Vcd|2 • Vcs=0.966 ± 0.008 [exp] ± 0.093 [th] • Vcd=0.225 ± 0.004 [exp] ± 0.022 [th] • Relies on correct shape and normalization of the form factors Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  17. CLEO-c untagged form factor analysis Combine measured |Vcx|f+ (0) with FNAL-MILC-HPQCD value for f+(0)PRL 94, 011601 (2005) Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  18. A check on the theory CLEO-c results based on 281 pb-1 (tagged) BR(D mn)=(4.40.70.1)10-4 BR(D  en) <2.410-5 BR(D  tn) <3.110-3 (more details on Stone’s talk) 50 signal candidates, 2.8 bgd Ratio D+→m+n does not depend upon Vcd Missing mass2 = (Ebeam-Emu)2-(pD-pm)2 (GeV)2 Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  19. . Comparison with FNAL-MILC-HPQCD predictions Data and theory are consistent within error Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  20. W branching ratios and Vcs • LEP-2 performed measurements sensitive to |Vcs| from on-shell W± decays: • Using: |Vud|2+|Vus|2+|Vub|2+|Vcd|2+ |Vcb|2=1.0476 ±0.0074 |Vcs| =0.976 ±0.014 • Error includes contributions from uncertainties on as and other CKM parameters, but is dominated by ±0.013 from the measurements of the W branching fractions • DELPHI tagged W+ cs analysis |Vcs| =0.94 ±0.014 +0.32-0.26 Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  21. Neutrino/anti-neutrino interactions and Vcd • Method: n+dc+m  |Vcd|2Bm [average semileptonic branching ratio of charm] <|Vcd|2Bm>=(0.4630.034)x10-2 [pdg 2006] n - Bm= 0.0873 0.0052 |Vcd|2 c d |Vcd|=0.230  0.011 (5% accuracy) Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  22. Summary • Best Vcs direct determination, using Gexp(Ken) and lattice form factors: • Best Vcd direct determination from n,n interactions • With these inputs and |Vcb|=(41.60.6)x10-3 [pdg 2006] unitarity constraint on the 2nd row gives: Tagged fit Untagged fit Error dominated by theoretical uncertainty in |Vcs| Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

  23. Future prospects • CLEO-c expects to accumulate 750 pb-1 at the y(3770)increased statistics will allow to pin down shape of form factors and constrain theoretical calculations • Further refinements of lattice calculations (now dominating errors) are under way • Goal to determine |Vcs| and |Vcd| down to a few % accuracy Marina Artuso WG1 CKM 2006

More Related