190 likes | 275 Views
Vaivads A. and Cluster Auroral Team. A uroral field-aligned acceleration Cluster results.
E N D
Vaivads A. and Cluster Auroral Team Auroral field-aligned accelerationCluster results André M., Backrud M., BuchertS., Olsson A.,Kistler L. M., Mouikis C., Quinn J. M., BosquedJ.-M., Cornilleau-Wehrlin N., Fazakerly A.,Marklund G., NewellP., Janhunen P., Rauch J.-L., Kadokura A., Taguchi M.
Outline • Cluster orbit • 28 April 2001 DMSP/Cluster conjunction • Aurora vs Magnetopause • Conclusions
Generator E.j<0? particle flux? Orbit in March Orbit in September Cluster on auroral field lines after Parks(1991) Generator Auroral acceleration Energy transportTemporal evolutionEquipotential line closure
Cluster Cluster FAST Polar Janhunen et al., 2001 How does equipotential lines close? DMSP Mozer 2001
Cluster/DMSP conjunction ovt s/c1 2001-04-28 1900-1940 Syowa S hemisphereMLT ~20Geomagnetically quiet3kV aurora~200W/m ~15km Plasma sheet boundary layerLow latitude boundary layer
s/c1 2001-04-28 1915:30 UT -70 s/c 1 s/c 2,3 +2.5 min Auroral arc GMlat s/c 4 +3.5 min DMSP F14 +3.5min -80 85 GMlong 92 Ground mapping
Region I DMSP F14 observations
DMSP F14 observations • Arc width ~10-15 km in ionosphere • Inetgrated energy flux ~200 W/m. (max 20mW/m2) • Acceleration potential ~3kV.
s/c 1..4, small scale (2 min, ~100km) E E E E Vps
sc1..4, small scale II Vps F SII SSII BCS
Other energy sources Ions as energy source ? H+ [eV] 40 W/m Efl[mW/m2] Waves ? (1-10Hz) 1.5 W/m SSII[mWs/m2]
zoom Aurora vs Magnetopause densityB
Aurora E B S|| F
zoom Aurora vs Magnetopause densityB
Magnetopause E B S|| F
Aurora vs Magnetopause • Can we infer E|| from measurements of Eperp • OUTstanding small scales vs BIG scales
Conclusions • Cluster/DMSP conjunction energy flux balance DMSP ~220W/m / Cluster ~70-200W/m agreement with U-potential DMSP ~3kV / Cluster ~2-5kV top of the auroral cavity ions or waves cannot power aurora (in this case) • Aurora vs Magnetopause infer E|| from Eperp