1 / 23

Validation Study of Two Rapeseed Oil Body Extraction Methods

Validation Study of Two Rapeseed Oil Body Extraction Methods. Stephanie BLASER Marc ANTON, Eisabeth DAVID-BRIAND, Thibault LOISELEUX INRA 18/07/2014. Introduction. Rapeseed Brassica napus Common uses Bulk oil - canola oil High protein a nimal feed Biodiesel. Introduction.

dane-gordon
Download Presentation

Validation Study of Two Rapeseed Oil Body Extraction Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Validation Study of TwoRapeseedOil Body Extraction Methods Stephanie BLASER Marc ANTON, Eisabeth DAVID-BRIAND, Thibault LOISELEUX INRA 18/07/2014

  2. Introduction • Rapeseed • Brassicanapus • Common uses • Bulkoil - canola oil • High proteinanimal feed • Biodiesel

  3. Introduction • Oil bodies • Energystorage structures in plant seeds • 0.5- 2.5 µm diameter • Components • Triaclyglycerolcore • Outer phospholipidmonolayer • Charged surface proteins - oleosins • Structure givesphysical and chemicalstability

  4. Introduction • Potential applications in the humanfood system • Deliver stable, preemulsifedoilintoappropriatefoodsystems • Create a poorly-digestedemulsion, through high pressure processing, for the increasing obese population • Have an oil source extractedwithoutsolvents • Objective • Find the methodthatextracts the highestquantity of oil bodies with the highestpurity

  5. Materials and Methods • Extraction Method 3

  6. Materials and Methods • Extraction Method 5

  7. Materials and Methods • Extraction 3 and 5 treatments • Regular - freshcream in phosphate buffer (100 mg/ml) • Freeze-driedcream in phosphate buffer • Freeze-driedcream in water • Analyses • Dry Matter • Size • Microscope • Granulometer • Nanosizer • Protein quantification • BSA • Lipid quantification • Isopropanol/hexane extraction

  8. Results

  9. CreamWeights

  10. Light Microscope Method 3 Method 5 63x 63x

  11. Confocal Microscope Method 3

  12. Granulometer

  13. Nanosizer – Method 3 Regular Freeze-dried

  14. Nanosizer – Method 5 Regular Freeze-dried

  15. Lipid Quantification

  16. Protein Quantification

  17. Dry Matter

  18. Discussion • Cream Collection Weights • No major differencebetween Method 3 and 5 • Size • Method 3 vs 5 • Bothdisplayedsimilarpresence of floculation and particle sizes- granulometer, nanosize, and light microscope • Regular vs. Freeze-dried • Light microscope • No major visualdifferences • Granulometer • More floculation present in samplesfreeze-driedwithbuffer • Nanosizer • Freeze-driedsamplesshoweda wider range of particle sizes • Differences in freeze-driedsamplespotentiallydue to destruction of oil bodies duringharshtreatment

  19. Discussion • Lipid Quantification • Slightlyhigher collection from Method 3 • Protein Quantification • Slighlylower concentration from Method 3 • Dry Matter • Slightlyhigher Percent Dry Matterfrom Method 3

  20. Discussion • Challenges • Cream collection • Cream can stick to cap of centrifuge tube • Cream in Method 3 is, in general, not as firm and durable as Method 5 • Size measurement instrumentation • Granulometer and nanometer have size detectionlimitsthat are on bothsides of the oil bodies upper and lowerdiameter range • New equipmentarrivingnextmonth • Freeze-drying • Low volume of final product • Time consuming • Slightlylowerprotein content • With buffer • Powdery final product - easier to collect • Contained phosphate buffer salts • Room for errors in calculations • With water • Waxy final product - more difficult to collect

  21. Sustainability • Future options • Usingsustainabiliygrownseeds • 2010 Unilever Sustainable Agriculture Code • Put intoeffect in Germany under Cargill • Using the valueableprotein for a humanfood source and not just for animal meal • Hurdles: glucosinolates, phenolics, phytates, and high amount of fiber • Benefits: balanced amino acid profile, functional properties (emulsifying, foaming, and gelling), and new alternative to feed increasing population • Creatingindustrialscale extraction methodswithout the use of dangeroussolvents

  22. Conclusion • Method 3 • More consistent • Less time consuming • Lessprotein contamination • Method 5 • Easier handling of cream • Long soakstep • More protein contamination • Freeze-drying • Time consuming • Few addedbenefits • Nextstep • Compare againstThibault’s data • Increase collection volume to largerbenchscale

  23. Thank You Stephanie Jung, PhD Marc Anton, PhD Elisabeth David-Briand Thibault Loiseleux

More Related